The Man with the Golden Arm
A fitting
subtitle for this movie could be “Trainspotting in 1955”.
In the
Danish edition of the List that I follow two 1955 movies are missing. Whether they were removed to make room for the
special Danish entries or additions from the grand 10th edition
revision I have not yet worked out, but suffice to say that they were not
deemed worthy for the edition I hold. I have arrived at the first of these, “The
Man with the Golden Arm” (the other is “Oklahoma!”).
The obvious
first question is if there is a reason this should be a leftover movie. Well,
both yes and no (ambiguous is my middle name…), this movie has strengths and
qualities that warrant the inclusion, but it is also a terribly difficult movie
to watch and not something I would like to see again.
The thing
about “The Man with the Golden Arm” is that it is a substance abuse movie and
they are by definition difficult. I am not a fan of those and I do think it
takes a measure of masochism to enjoy them that I do not possess. That is not
to say that they have no value, not at all. I suppose they are important and
that people should know of the problems with substance abuse, but they feel
like torment to me and I take little pleasure in them.
This time
the substance in question is heroin, or something very similar (for some reason
the drug is never named, but the description fits all too well on heroin) and I
believe that is a first. That makes “The Man with the Golden Arm” to heroin
what “Lost Weekend” was to alcohol.
Frank
Sinatra (yes, the one and only) is Frankie “Dealer” Machine. At the opening of
the movie he is returning from a rehab prison where he has been cured of heroin
addiction and learned to be a drummer. Things are looking up for Frankie who is
ready for a fresh start on life.
However
everybody and their mother is hell bent on sabotaging things for Frankie and
drag him into the gutter. With friends like these Frankie need no enemies.
There are almost too many to list.
His friend
Sparrow (Arnold Stang) is a hustler who is quick to get him in trouble for
wearing a stolen suit. Zero Schwiefka (Robert Strauss) runs a gambling racket
and want his best dealer, Frankie, back on the job. “Nifty Louie” is a heroin
dealer constantly tempting Frankie with a fix and worst of all is Frankie’s
wife Zosh (Eleanor Parker).
Zosh is
almost (but probably) psychotic in her need to keep Frankie on a leash. She is
faking paralysis, for which Frankie married her out of guilt for having caused
it, in order to keep him around and she is strongly opposed to him becoming a
drummer. Instead she want him back dealing cards so he can take care of her and
will not go anywhere. She is insanely jealous and see herself victimized in all
things with no sympathy left for Frankie. Truly a one-way marriage.
Faced with
pressure from all sides Frankie eventually crumples. He is back dealing cards
and taking drugs and when he finally gets a drum audition he is in no shape to
perform.
It is a
painful deroute. The pressure Frankie is under is immense and unfair so there
is some sympathy for his desperation. Still, we know going back on drugs is the
wrong solution and watching him succumb is just terrible. Frankie has one
person willing to support him, Molly (Kim Novak), an old flame, but when he
finally gives in it becomes too much for her and she walks out on him. That is
the absolute low point of the movie.
There is
redemption in the end though. Frankie seeks help from Molly and together they
face up to the addiction. Frankie is locked up in a room taking a cold turkey
in a scene that was essentially copied in “Trainspotting”. In addition we get a
little murder mystery that propels the resolution, and freed of all ties
Frankie makes the obvious decision to start all over in a new place with new
people, something he should have done to begin with.
It was so
hard watching this one that I had to chop it up in small pieces to get through
it and still there were times when I just did not feel like watching anymore.
Drug addiction is just such a horrible theme and this movie goes a long way to
show how powerless its victims are in fighting it. We now Frankie has to get
knocked down before the resolution and that premise almost kills the movie. I
would have supposed a 1955 movie would have been gentler with its audience, but
Preminger pulls no punches. Frankie (and us, the audience) gets it right in the
face every time.
It is odd
to watch Frank Sinatra as a junkie. There is no singing or dancing, only misery
and desperation and it is true reminder that Sinatra was more than a crooner,
that he was in fact a talented actor. He is likable and that is part of the
frustration. Why cannot he see that all these so-called friends will him no
good?
The jazzy
Bernstein score is highlighted as an asset of the movie. That is possible. I
almost did not hear it. That may be a good thing, blending in so seamlessly
with the movie that it supports it, but does not stand out. I feel a bit
cheated though. I really like jazz.
A well-done
drug addiction movie featuring Frank Sinatra is probably a must-see. For me it
is a been there – done that – don’t want to go back.
I haven't seen this and now I'm not anxious to do so. We have another thing in common I see. I'm not a fan of drug addiction movies either. Requiem of a Dream was one of my worst movie experiences ever. It's like the filmmakers want to rub our noses in misery. Yuck.
ReplyDeleteWell, there are positives, but they are overwhelmed by the subject matter.
DeleteYes, we do have that in common and I am pretty sure we are not alone. It is just not fun to watch people in that sort of misery. I never saw Requiem for a Dream for that very reason.