Giganten
Everything
is bigger in Texas. THE movie about Texas would have to be a giant among movies
and that is exactly what it is. At three hours and fourteen minutes it is a
monster to get through (add to that an entire disk of extra material), but also
the scope, the lavishness and the all-star cast is just bigger than most other
pictures.
“Giant” is
in many ways for Texas what “Gone with the Wind” was for Georgia, a portrait of
an iconic, if fictional, family on the backdrop of a time and events that
changed the land. For “GwtW” it was a plantation through the civil war and the
restoration, in “Giant” it is a ranch during the transition from agrarian
cowboy land to cosmopolitan oil money. In both cases a transition from conservatism
to modernity and I am sure something that was part of forming the American
narrative. Yeah, big words from an outsider, but this is not really rocket
science.
Epic tales
are usually problematic in movies because the medium does not really lend
itself well to that sort of story. You need a television series or a book
format. In a movie the story is truncated by how long you can keep people in
the cinema and usually end up mutilated through abbreviation. I would say
George Stevens, the director, did a decent job here, but that abbreviation is
still the weakness of the film.
We follow
Bick Benedict (Rock Hudson), third generation owner of the enormous Reata ranch
in Texas and Leslie Benedict (Elizabeth Taylor) of green and verdant Maryland
from their brief courtship in their youth to their middle age thirty years
later. They represent two very different points of view, ultra conservative
Bick and progressive and liberated Leslie, and they could hardly be more
different. In fact if you ever needed an argument against quick and spontaneous
weddings this would be it. They practically come from different planets and had
they known each other a little better I doubt they would ever have married.
The
conflict between them is very much the fuel of the movie. As they approach each
challenge from their own end of the spectrum we get an issue out of practically
everything. It is tempting to see Bick’s conservatism as little more than the
right to be an asshole and Leslie as the one bringing some common sense to this
backward place, but it is not the entire story. Particularly in the beginning
we see Leslie losing the sense of the situation in her eagerness to bring on
modernity. Yes, it is terribly old fashioned to exclude women from politics,
but sometimes men just like to have their own thing and we still do.
As Bick and
Leslie grow older they converge as a symbol of modern Texas I suppose. Leslie
gets to like the Texas freedom and Bick embraces modernity, both of them
swallowing a few camels on the way. I think we are supposed to like both of
them from the beginning, but maybe I am just not attuned to the Texas way of
doing things. In the name of his conservative heritage Bick is being a dick
again and again. Whether it is against the Latinos, women, his children or Jett
Rink, Bick is a bigot. It earned him a hearty dislike from me that was only
reluctantly lifted near the end. I think the final compromise is still fairly to
the right of my preferences.
What saves
the film from being tedious family drama is the character of Jett Rink (James
Dean). Jett is the personification of outside pressure on the family. From
start to end he is the one poking at the family through his crush on Leslie,
his carving out a piece of Reata land and by bringing in oil millions and a
possible end to the old way of life. Jett is progress in the fast lane, the
energy the tears up old bond, but he is no less a bigot than Bick. However without
scruples and conscience he is also the more dangerous of the two. In a sense he
is Texas without restraint. The manner in which the Benedicts deal with Jett
Rink is a reflection of their own development.
For me the
single most interesting element of “Giant” is the treatment of racism. That is
done in a very modern way, especially when you consider this is 1956 and as far
as I understand it years before the civil rights movement. The movie highlights
the conditions the Mexicans, or Hispanics are living under and especially the
offhand way they are treated by whites. They are very literally second class
people and even talking to them as normal people is frowned upon. Of course
when Leslie’s and Benedicts son, Jordy (Dennis Hopper) marries a Latino that
really set the issue on the edge. Seeing Bick smiling at his white grandson and
frowning at his mixed-blood grandson was infuriating. My own son is in a sense
a mix and seventy-five years ago I would have been Jordy.
This is
definitely a movie with an excellent cast and an interesting use of it as well.
Instead of making old actors look young, the principal actors here are all
young and made to look older as the story progress, something I think works
better than the other way around. Hudson, Taylor and Dean all pull that off
beautifully. This was the last movie James Dean did, he died before shooting
was over, and it is by far the most tempered performance of his. The mannerism
that tended to annoy me in his two other movies is not gone, but toned down and
that suits him. Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor still had many movies to come
and they both deliver very mature performances here.
When it
comes to “Giant” whether I like it or not feels irrelevant. This is a big movie
and very impressive at that and actually quite interesting beyond all the
dazzle.
I haven't seen this one yet. It doesn't exactly sound like my cup of tea but I am curious to see.
ReplyDeleteIt is big enough that the shear size makes it interesting and I think it is worth watching even if you are not too sympathetic to the characters.
DeleteThere's some good stuff in Giant. I think it's longer than it needs to be, but there's some value in it.
ReplyDeleteIndeed. I found the racism theme surprisingly prominent for a movie from the fifties and that is certainly a good thing.
DeleteI'm with Steve in that I would have preferred it to be shorter, but it is what it is. Personally, I thought Texas came off pretty badly through much of this film, which surprised me. It made me wonder if attitudes had changed that much since the movie was made, or if the Hollywood filmmakers were taking shots at Texas.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the extra material the Texans were quite upset with the novel, but equally happy with the movie. Either they feared a lot worse or they actually like the way they are portrayed here.
DeleteI enjoyed Giant and I think the story holds up well. Particularly the themes of the American dream, wealth, and (as you rightly said)racism.
ReplyDeleteYeah, there are many modern elements in this movie and the general quality is good.
DeleteGiant was a lot better than I had expected, and so was James Dean. as a comment on "race relations", Giant was pretty far ahead of its time.
ReplyDeleteIt was indeed and it surprised me. I would expect this from a movie in the seventies but not one from fifty-six.
DeletePretty much agree with you. There are parts that are good, and the story has more complexity than you would expect, but other parts are dated even more than they were at the time.
ReplyDeleteI would have given Taylor an Oscar nomination for her performance in this: I really liked her Leslie, and she handled the aging of her character well, giving her a quiet maturity.
I think she deserved a nomination as well. She did outstandingly here.
DeleteI have this feeling that the parts I did not like or that felt dated had more to do with me not being attuned to the Texas way of thinking. Somehow I would not be surprised if a Texan watching this movie today would feel right at home. Maybe I am just prejudiced.