A Nightmare on Elm Street
In 1984, I was eleven years old. Horror
movies were way to scary for me and even “Ghostbusters” crossed that line.
Needless to say, a movie like “A Nightmare on Elm Street” was way outside what
I was going to watch at the time. It was, however, a movie that was impossible
to avoid and the posters as well as the street-talk was enough to freak me out.
For this reason, I watched it later than most people, which is likely a good
thing but today I consider it a true classic, not only for its impact on
popular culture but for its inherent qualities.
The high school students Tina (Amanda
Wyss), Nancy (Heather Langenkamp), Glen (Johnny Depp) and Rod (Nick Corri) have
scary dreams of a creepy man with a burnt face and knives on his fingers,
chasing them. Tina is so scared of this she is asking her friends over at
night, including her boyfriend, Rod. During the night her dream gets really bad
when the creepy guy catches her and cuts her up. While it is happening in her
dream, the effect is very real as she is tossed and turned around the bedroom
with blood spraying everywhere and Rod starring in shock as his girlfriend is
getting torn apart.
Obviously, Rod is being charged with the
murder, but Nancy, daughter of the police chief, is convinced it was not Rod,
but the creepy guy because he is trying to do the same thing to her. Every time
she doses off, he is there, and she only barely avoids getting chopped up
herself. It is all she can do to stay awake, and it does not help that nobody
believes her. Not her mother, nor the police or even Glen although he appears
to have similar dreams.
Eventually we learn that the creepy guy is
a Freddy Krueger (Robert Englund), a serial child murderer whom the parents had
trapped and burned to cinders. Now he is back in supernatural form to take his
revenge on their children.
The scenario of teenagers chased by demons
is old like in really really old and both “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” and “Halloween”
has walked this ground. Yet, it feels as if many of the tropes of this genre
either originates or were perfected by “A Nightmare on Elm Street”. What they
are up against is evil with demonic powers, nobody, certainly not the adults
believe them and only by facing the fear (i.e. to grow up) can they overcome
the danger.
Freddy Krueger is the stuff of legends, both
from his gruesome appearance and through his omnipotency. Residing in the
dreamworld, there is no physical laws restricting him, but what makes him
really scary is that he transcends the dreamworld into reality. We all have had
scary dreams and what is it we tell ourselves when we wake up? Phew, this was
only a dream. But what if it is not only a dream? What if the terror can reach
us also when we are awake or can harm our real world? That is truly scary.
My son, who never watched the movie before,
knows exactly who Freddy Krueger is. “He looks like me”, he says, “I kind of
like him”. My son suffers greatly from atopic eczema and while I do not agree
there, it does say something about how the character has achieved a life of its
own that goes far beyond the movie itself. Freddy Krueger is the boogieman.
“A Nightmare of Elm Street” was made on a
shoestring budget. In fact, a lot of it is either made for free or paid with
the participant own money, yet it is difficult to see from the results. It is a
movie heavy on special effect and with a few near misses they mostly work
amazingly well. Somethings do not have to be terribly advanced to be scarry,
but with Krueger himself, the prosthetics and the effect are worthy of a far
more expensive movie. This is from an age before CGI and yet they pulled off
some amazing stuff there. The murder of Glenn is one of the most spectacular I
have witnessed in a long time. The budget way kept low by relying on unknown
actors but a lot of those have had impressive career after this movie and I
think the acting performance is generally a lot better than should be expected.
Sometimes it takes a very low budget to
trigger the creativity that makes a great movie and “A Nightmare on Elm Street”
became a huge success both as a movie and a franchise and is today recognized
as a classic.
In 2010 a remake was made with a very
different budget, but, frankly, I prefer the original. I much prefer the
horrific ambience to cheap jump-scares.
While horror movies are still not my territory,
I do not hesitate recommending “A Nightmare on Elm Street”. This is definitely
a movie you must see... before your dreams kill you, wuhahaha...
This series is up and down--the second movie is mid-level at best and the last few are absolute trash. Nightmare 3 is a high point and worth seeing.
ReplyDeleteIf you can't get enough Freddy, track down Wes Craven's New Nightmare. It does the series proud and is almost as good as this original.
The only other Elm Street movie I have watched is the 2010 remake and that one was okay. I just happen to like the creativity that compensates a small budget. Big budgets tends towards conformity while movies on a small budget tend to dare to go new ways.
Delete