The Breakfast Club
It is a new year for me, 1985, and the
first entry is “The Breakfast Club”.
In my youth, there was no way around “The
Breakfast Club”. This was a movie everybody had watched, and everybody were referring
too. In social circles, but also in media and in countless tv-series and movies.
Of course I watched it too, but it took me a bit longer to recognize the
significance of it than most. I guess I was not much of a rebellious youth at
the time.
“The Breakfast Club” takes place in the
course of a single Saturday and except for a few bookending scenes, takes place
entirely inside a high school with only seven characters appearing. Five of
these characters are high school students there for detention, each
representing a different type in the school. There is the “Princess”, Claire
(Molly Ringwald), the “Basket case”, Allison (Ally Sheedy), the “Athlete”, Andrew
(Emilio Estevez), the “Brain”, Brian (Anthony Michael Hall) and the “Criminal”,
John (Judd Nelson).
The entire movie is about the interactions
of these five teenagers during detention. It plays out as a “kammerspiel”
(sorry could not find an English translation, look it up) in the Strindberg
tradition, not unlike “12 Angry Men”. To begin with each character is their type,
provoking each other by playing on their stereotypes. John manages to throw the
discipline teacher, Richard Vernon (Paul Gleason) into a frenzy, he picks a
fight with Andrew and is extremely provocative towards Claire, whom he seems to
find a sadistic glee in getting flustered. Allison is plain weird and generally
ignored and Brian, the geek, is simply discounted by the others.
Something happens over the course of the
movie. While their assignment of the day is to write an essay about how they
see themselves, they actually learn things about each other that shatters their
preconceptions. Each have their crosses to carry that seem invisible to others
and each of them are a lot more than their stereotype. It is a process, but not
a guided process. They fight, they shout, tease, mock, but they actually also
listens, and that is the exciting thing. They all experience that when you
start learning something about other people, it is very difficult to reduce
them back to stereotypes.
Each character has a depth that we are unaware
of going in and learning this depth, we the audience, are also listening and
learning and getting an unexpected understanding of these young people. In
hindsight we may think that their problems are predictable, but so what? To these
children, they are deadly serious problems. It is why they are in detention, and
they are uniquely able to mirror themselves in the issues the others are struggling
with. They also realize that they can bond in unexpected ways. Their dance-off
or their roaming through the school are good examples.
The question of whether this understanding
and bonding is confined to this room or can be extended to the “real” outside
world is popped by Brian: “What happens on Monday?”, but instead of the rose-hued,
yes, we will all be friends, the five of them have no illusions. This doubt can
be construed as depressing defeatism, but I see it as refreshing clarity. They
are changed by this experience, maybe even profoundly, but on their own terms
and without obligations.
I had a discussion with my wife on whether
the movie has aged well. My point was (and is) that these issues are universal
and change hair and cloth fashion, this movie could be made today, that it has
aged very well indeed. Her argument was that this movie would be wasted on
youth today. That the depth and pace and sentiment of the movie would be too deep,
to slow and too profound for the tik-tok generation. She may be right and that
saddens me greatly. In the compartmentalized world today of echo chambers, the
central message of going beyond type and actually listen, is sorely needed. “The
Breakfast Club” is an excellent exponent of it and I would encourage any teenager
(anybody, really) to watch it.
The five actors became known as the
brat-pack and “The Breakfast Club” springboarded them into excellent Hollywood
careers. Checking their filmographies you get lists great movies and tv-series
over the past forty years. And John Hughes? Well, he was the king of the teenage
movie, a status he still holds, fifteen years after his death.
If you have not watched “The Breakfast Club”,
you need to fix that gap immediately.
I think this is a "you need to see this at the right time" movie.
ReplyDeleteIt came out during my final year of high school. I saw it at the right time.
I suppose it works very in high school, but there are universal qualities here that should work at any age. I was younger when I watched it first time, and while I only fully appreciated it later, I do remember liking it a lot.
DeleteBeing in my 40s right now, this film has a mixed legacy for me. I can appreciate for what John Hughes wanted to say intimately and break away from the high school stereotypes. On the other hand, it feels like a product of its time and it has this feel like this is the go-to high school film for kids to watch. I went to high school in the mid-90s and I wasn't like any of those kids. I was an outsider that really didn't fit in as I couldn't relate to that film at all.
ReplyDeleteYears later, people say it's a classic but it never resonated with me at all. Plus, I hated that Ally Sheedy's character got a makeover as I preferred the way she looked early on. I'm not sure if I would want my niece and nephew to see this when they become teens. I hate the TikTok generation as I think your wife's assessment is spot-on. It is sad that kids today don't have the patience to watch something that can last longer than 10 seconds a shot.
I think most of us who review movies as a hobby were outsiders in high school.
ReplyDeleteI follow you in the sense that these are specific types and may not catch us all. But I also think that the point is that nobody can be reduced to stereotypes and that includes types not represented here.
I agre on Ally's makeover. I liked here old look better. And she should be accepted for what she is , not how she looks. I like to think the makeover is Claire's way of accepting her.