The Purple Rose of Cairo
My personal opinion that the best Woody
Allen movies are those without Woody Allen just got another confirmation. While
“The Purple Rose of Cairo” is undisputably a Woody Allen movie, he is himself
absent from the movie and the movie totally works.
We are in New Jersey during the Great
Depression where Cecilia (Mia Farrow) is a not very successful waitress, living
in a not very successful relationship with the abusive and lazy Monk (Danny
Aiello). Cecilia spends her time dreaming of something better and nowhere more
so than in the cinema.
Her current favourite movie is a romantic
flick called “The Purple Rose of Cairo” and she watches it as often as she can
get away with it. One fateful evening something weird happens. The character
Tom Baxter (Jeff Daniels), an archaeologist who in the movie will fall in love
with a cabaret singer, suddenly turns around and addresses Cecilia directly. He
has noticed that she is always there and looking at him and he want to know
her. Tom steps out of the movie and leave the cinema with Cecilia.
Unsurprisingly, this gets both very strange
and really messy. The movie cannot go on without Tom, leaving the other
characters in confusion, the cinema owner does not know if he dares stop the
movie and calls the studio in a panic. The studio is at a loss on what to do
since this is spreading to other towns and sends the actor behind the Tom
Baxter character, Gil Shepherd, to New Jersey to convince Tom to rejoin the
movie. Meanwhile, Cecilia and Tom have a most strange affair with Tom realizing
that the real world is a lot more complicated than his movie world and Cecilia
trying to balance everything going on. This is not getting easier when Gil
shows up and seduces her. Now Cecilia has to chose between a fantasy character
or a real-life man.
It is very easy to recognize this as a Woody
Allen movie. He has projected a lot of his own characters into the Cecilia
character, making her a female version of himself. Woody Allen also has a thing
for the period between the wars and in many ways “The Purple Rose of Cairo” is
a parallel to his later movie “Midnight in Paris”, which incidentally is my favourite
Woody Allen movie. While Owen Wilson’s character is being transported back to
the 1920’ies, Cecilia is being transported into the world of her movies (in the
thirties) and this daydream or surreal experience helps them find out something
about themselves and get out of a rut they are stuck in.
The idea of getting in and out of a movie
harks back to at least Buster Keaton’s “Sherlock Jr.” and this is an obvious
inspiration. A decade or so after “The Purple Rose of Cairo”, this theme was
explored again in “The Last Action Hero” with a lot of the same points. This is
both a very outlandish theme and one that most people cannot help to have had,
watching movies, “what if I could join the movie or maybe these people would
show up in real life?”. It takes some juggling to make us suspend our
disbelief, but I think Allen is quite successful here, mainly by making it a
comedy. By using it for comedic effect, we can laugh off the elements that
makes no sense and the craziness becomes part of the fun.
This is where I think “The Purple Rose of
Cairo” gets successful, it is genuinely funny. Not in the slapstick manner of “Sherlock
Jr.”, but in the messy way an Allen movie gets funny with the critical element
that we are spared Allen himself. Mia Farrow and Jeff Daniels are fully able to
lift this kind of comedy, and I was having a great time watching this.
I honestly expected this to be a movie I
just had to get over with and then it turned out to be one of the best movies
so far of 1985. Highly recommended.
For me, it's all about the ending. It's about why she makes the choice that she does, even if she's not entirely aware of why she does.
ReplyDeleteThat is a good point. The ending feels like a downer, but she has actually moved a long way by making her choice.
Delete