Romantik om bord
I actually like a good romantic comedy. A
funny and intelligent romantic comedy is a guilty pleasure and working my way
through the list I have watched a lot of good ones through the thirties and the
first half of the forties. The classic screwball comedy is rom-com at its peak.
Sadly “An Affair to remember” is not such a
movie.
Instead it presses all the wrong buttons
for me and in the end I do not know whether to laugh or to cry. According to
the Book it has won such accolades as being named the most romantic movie ever.
This baffles me and I suppose say a bit about such a jury. You want “most
romantic movie”? Try “Brief Encounter”.
Where to start…
Nicolò (Nickie) Ferrante (Cary Grant) and Terry
McKay (Deborah Kerr) meet on a cruise ship crossing the Atlantic and fall in
love. Nickie is a playboy with no job or profession and Terry is… well later we
find out she is a famous singer, but initially we know very little of her. This
is first time my eyebrows go up, we know practically nothing of these two
people but that they seem to be good at fooling around. It gradually occurs to
me that they must be rather young. Based on Nickie’s grandmother I would place
him mid-thirties and Terry a bit less, maybe late twenties. Yet Cary Grant was 53
at the time and looked closer to sixty and Kerr albeit “only” 36 looks and acts
as if she was in her mid-forties. This is rather confusing. Are these people
middle aged acting silly or are they young people with very conservative
tastes? A half explanation is that this is 1957 and the world looked like this,
but I am not buying it.
Anyway, the first half of the movie takes
place on this cruise ship where they are having an affair, but eagerly trying
to hide it. Nickie is supposed to get married and Terry has some dude waiting
for her (but is not married, heaven forbid). This is mildly funny because the
entire ship knows of the affair. A wealthy and chubby fan gets constantly
snubbed by Nickie and Terry and those incidents are (sadly) the second funniest
elements of the movie. There is a lot of banter between the two, but it never
reaches the heights that we know Leo McCarey and Cary Grant are capable of.
Finally, before disembarking they promise each other to sort things out and
meet on top of Empire State Building in six months.
Six month later Nickie is waiting on the
top floor, Terry is running to meet her appointment… and is run down by a car
and hurts her legs. Obviously she cannot make her appointment, but she also
refuses to meet or even leave a message for Nickie until she can walk again.
Nickie is understandably disappointed, not just by being burned, but by being
dumped altogether. He has given up his lifestyle and become a poor painter,
though I do not entirely understand how he suddenly loses his wealth, and goes
through a lot of pain.
Finally Nickie finds Terry in her apartment
and in a roundabout way tries to find out what on Earth happened. Even at this
point Terry refuses to tell Nickie that she cannot walk. Apparently she prefers
the pain she is inflicting both of them. When he finally finds out what is
bugging her Nickie asks the question I have been dying to ask for the past half
hour “Why did you not let me know?”. The crucial question of the entire movie.
But before she can answer he follows up with the bland and irrelevant question
“why did it happen to us?” and thereby cheats me for the answer.
The entire premise of the drama is so
incredibly stupid that I almost gave up on watching it. Did she really think
that he would take it bad that she had an accident? And what kind of person
prefers to inflict so much pain and uncertainty to save her pride. It just
makes no sense at all.
Add to this the sappy sentimentality that
clings to everything in this movie like sticky molasses, such as the children
choir or the final line: “If you can paint, I can walk; anything can happen,
don't you think?". Ugh.
The one element I really liked was Nickie’s
grandmother, (Cathleen Nesbitt). She was a witty and feisty old lady with a
sparkle in her eyes. She made me crack up, but the bliss was unfortunately
short-lived.
I doubt this is a movie I will be watching
again. There are too many better rom-coms around. Think of watching it? Do
yourself a favor and pick “The Awful Truth” instead.
Yes, this failed to raise any feelings other than annoyance. As much as I love Cary Grant, this did nothing for me, and like you just kept wondering 'why not tell him?'.
ReplyDeleteWhile it does have some comedy, I don't think of this as a rom-com, which I prefer overall to straight romantic dramas.
I think the tried to make it a rom-com. A lot of the banter in the first half seems to be there mainly if not solely for comedic effect. The problem of course is that it does not really work, but the intent is there.
DeleteI much prefer the 1939 original, simply called "Love Affair", with Irene Dunne and Charles Boyer. It's still a melodrama but Dunne lightens things up considerably. I was never a big fan of this version.
ReplyDeleteI have not seen that one. Dunne would be a plus. But for me the most important change would have to be the premise. No matter how good the actors that premise is impossible to work with.
DeleteI felt this was just okay. It's definitely not a romantic comedy. Like everyone else, I was irritated by the device of her simply not telling him (and for no good reason).
ReplyDeleteNot romantic or not comedy? In my opinion it is neither, at least as effect. The device is so infuriating that I felt like slapping her, then thought better of it and decided to blame the writer of the screenplay.
DeleteThis one hits pretty hard on the sap content. It's a movie I really want to like a hell of a lot more than I end up liking it. I like the cast, but it wants really hard to be weepy and comes off as just sort of strange. It's not one I'll likely watch again.
ReplyDeleteMarie's call out to Love Affair is a good one--I ended up rating both of these the same on Letterboxd. There's no real reason to watch one if you've seen the other.
Yeah, it turns out rather strange, almost surrealist as if this is happening in a parallel world with different and far more sappy rules. Weird.
Delete