Ved vejs ende
The next
movie is also an Ingmar Bergman movie. I brought it with me when I went home to
Denmark for my sister’s wedding this weekend and in all the stress and
commotion this may have been the wrong movie to bring. This is a slow movie to watch
when you are perfectly relaxed and able to focus, not casual viewing to rest
the brain. As a result it has taken me a few days to digest it and I cannot say
that I am entirely there yet, but alas, it is time for the review.
There is
something David Lynch about this movie, the movie that comes to mind is “The
Straight Story” in the way the movie moves between reality and weird,
surrealistic dream sequences and even in the “real” parts very odd things
sometimes happen with very little explanation. That all means that the first
impression is something like deadpan confusion. However now that I have been
thinking a bit about it I think I understand at least parts of it. I can be
quite dense.
The movie
is in one way a day in the life of Professor Isak Borg (Victor Sjöström), an elderly
gentleman who has to make the journey from his home in Stockholm down to Lund
in Skåne to receive an honorary title. He decides, much to the chagrin of his
housekeeper Agda (Jullan Kindahl), to make the journey by car rather than
flying. To those unfamiliar with Swedish geography that this is not a trivial
distance to drive in an old car. Isak’s daughter in-law, Marianne (Ingrid
Thulin) who is currently staying with him is joining him for the ride as her
husband Evald also lives in Skåne.
What
follows is an eventful and very emotional journey. It is in a second way a
journey through Isak Borg’s life, highlighting people and events that made him
a cold and lonely old man, starting with a dream he had the morning before
going watching his own dead corpse reach out for him. He has discussions with
Marianne that are pleasant and frank, but actually cruelly honest. As people
fighting politely and smiling. Surreal, but also liberating. They pick up three youthful hitchhikers
reminding him of his youth, especially the girl, Sara (Bibi Andersson), who
carry a striking similarity to his life’s true love (same actress). This leads
to a number of daydreams back to his youth, to a place of happiness where wild
strawberries grew. Smultronstället literally means the place of wild
strawberries and carry just about the same meaning as “Rosebud” in “Citizen
Kane”. This was also where he lost his girl to his brother Sigfrid, who much
better connected with her.
Isak and
Marianne also pick up a really weird couple who do nothing but humiliate each
other. Soon they are summarily dumped. A visit to Isak’s old mother also
triggers some odd emotions.
The short
of it is that by the time Isak and Marianne arrive in Lund Isak is mentally
transformed. He is humbled, but he is also happier and more tolerant towards
other people including his son and his housekeeper.
It seems a
common enough artistic concept to pack a lifetime into a single day and it is
something that fits very well to the movie media, but Bergman does it very
elegantly, and therefore this is one of the best versions I can think of.
Again, “The Straight Story” and “Citizen Kane” are similar movies that come to
mind, but what they have in technique and novelty, “Smultronstället” has in
humanity. We are getting awfully close to Isak Borg and that is a character who
all his life has prevented even his closest family to get close to him, but
here we are so close that I am almost blushing.
A lot has
to do with Victor Sjöström’s brilliant performance. He is terribly important to
the film and it is such a standout effort that it should have been considered
by the Academy. Victor Sjöström I have actually encountered once before. He
directed and performed in the notorious silent movie “Körkarlen” and was
apparently the greatest Swedish director until Bergman came along.
I think
under the right conditions I would have loved this movie and the fact that I
have been thinking a lot about it since I saw it is definitely a good sign. At
the time it was just the wrong movie to pick and that is not the movie’s fault.
I will take it out some day, sit back and really enjoy it.
This was the second Bergman film I ever saw many years ago and it didn't do much for me. As a whole I tend to not like many of his films anyway, so I can't say that my reaction was simply because I had seen so little of his work.
ReplyDeleteI have a feeling that Bergman is an aquired taste. My immediate reaction to this one was not so different from yours, but the more I think about it the better it gets.
DeleteIsn't it interesting that wild strawberries are such important symbols in both The Seventh Seal and here? And I think they symbolize the same thing - life, youth, and hope. I don't rank this one quite up with The Seventh Seal. I think it's kind of distancing even if you have plenty of time. But you could probably watch it many times and pick up new meaning each time.
ReplyDeleteIf you ever get a chance, you should watch Sjöström's The Wind (1928). It's an excellent movie and one of Gish's greatest performances in a career filled with greats.
I second marie_dressler's recommendation for The Wind.
DeleteI thought of that already while watching The Seventh Seal. It is a powerful symbol and I wonder if it is a special Swedish thing. It is also difficult not to think of "Rosebud" from Citizen Kane.
DeleteThe Wind sounds interesting. I will put it on my list.
I think in a lot of ways this might be one of Bergman's greatest films, but it suffers from not being that accessible. I'd rather watch a lot of his other films. I can't say I enjoyed it, or even fully understood it.
ReplyDeleteYes, it definitely has a problem with accessibility. I do not mind that you have to work a bit to find out what is going on, but some of the elements here is just confusing or maybe ambigious.
Delete