Han kom fra Laramie
Through the
first half of the fifties director Anthony Mann made a number of westerns with
James Stewart. I have already reviewed “Winchester 73” and “The Naked Spur” and
with “The Man from Laramie” I have completed this particular series, at least
as far at the List is concerned. The movies are each independent from each
other telling different stories and yet there are some elements running through
all of them. Of course I cannot speak for those other movies in the series I have
not seen, but I have a gut feeling they touch on similar issues.
The obvious
similarity is James Stewart himself, but it goes deeper than just using him as
the star of the movies. Jimmy Stewart was known for playing the Mr. Everybody
type, the guy anybody could relate to and who would represent the common sense
regular guy. Mann changed that. In his movies Stewart became a bundle of raw
nerves, angry, vengeful and traumatized. Oh, he would still be our hero and he
would end up doing the right thing but his motivations were not as kosher as we
would expect from Jimmy.
In “The Man
from Laramie” James Stewart’s Will Lockhart is on the hunt for the people who
sold advanced rifles to the Apache and enabled them to kill his brother while
on an army patrol. That is fair enough but this hunt is more an obsession than
an investigation. Lockhart is a terrier, persistent and stubborn far into the
ridiculous in his insistence of digging up the killers. There is a whining,
almost shrill note to this search which is completely at odds with the
character’s otherwise easy down to Earth attitude and it tells something of the
pain raging within him.
Being a
western there are of course only so many plotlines for a movie and on the
outside this is no exception. A stranger rides into town (In this case
Coronado, New Mexico) and unravels a rottenness permeating the town. The stranger,
Lockhart, is not the cause of the rot, but the trigger that release the tension
into an explosion. Dig a little though and the story gets more interesting.
In the case
of Coronado the problem is the Barb ranch and the Waggoman clan. Alec Waggoman
(Donald Crisp) owns most of everything and acts as the king of Coronado and
surroundings. His rule, ruthless but not without prosperity, is about to expire
and the next generation take over. The crown prince is an insane idiot (Dave,
played by Alex Nicol) completely unfit to run anything including himself. The king
while not entirely blind to his failings still dotes on him and let him get
away with his madness. As the third wheel the minister, or foreman Vic Hansbro
(Arthur Kennedy) is the one actually running the kingdom. He feels he deserve
to be the heir, but despite his filial dedication he will never be Alec’s son.
Instead he is charged with reining in Dave and be forever just the useful
servant.
Vic is
bitter and Dave is psychotic and suspicious of Vic. It is obvious that without
Alec these two will be at each other’s throat and Lockhart’s arrival is simply
the trigger that sets them off. They are of course the ones who sell guns to
the Apache and part of their hostility is directed at Lockhart who threatens
their secret, but it is also a mere tool in their struggle against each other.
A fight that has nothing to do with Lockhart. Dave longs to be the big and
powerful ruler and needs every outlet to be that and Vic is condensed
frustration at watching Dave tearing everything apart that he should rightly
have inherited.
Being the
butt end of Dave’s psychotic anger is no fun. Lockhart has his caravan burned,
his mules shot, his hand maimed and is accused of several murders. Apparently
for no other reason than being at the wrong place at the wrong time, but
particularly for not going away. As he hovers around the Waggoman clan he is a
symbol of threat to each of them. Is he the man from Alec’s dream? For Dave he
his defiance of his power and therefore making him impotent and for Vic
Lockhart may be the person he wished he was and therefore a provocation.
Of course
the whole thing plays out in a much less highbrow manner than the above
indicates. There is a solid amount of horse riding, gunfight and straight talk
to make this a western with a very easy appeal. It is easy to like Lockhart
despite his obsessive nature if nothing else then because of his un-corruptible
attitude. Of course being Jimmy Stewart we would expect that.
Also the
pace is really good. I was never really bored watching the movie and that is
always a plus. Add to that that the movie is beautiful to look at in
cinemascope colors and you are in for a treat.
If there is
anything negative then it would be that Lockhart’s quest is almost a MacGuffin.
Those guns and particularly the Apache are hardly of even secondary importance
compared to the role of the Waggoman implosion. I do not know if there is much
closure in this for Lockhart. Or maybe there is, but for the movie the aim had
nothing to do with the gun, but to clean the air on the Barb ranch.
Of the
three Mann/Stewart movies on the list I liked this one the best. For the
overall impression and entertainment value, but even more so for the depth of
the story. It is not often you get to say that about a western.