Freaks
I am far
too young to remember the circus sideshows of olden times. They were appendices
to the main circus where the audience could gawk at human oddities they would
never see in their normal life. I did see an American sideshow ensemble perform
at the Roskilde festival back in the nineties and I found myself gawking at
these performers who had done weird things to their bodies.
Yet, in our
small world where anything you can imagine is available at your fingertips on
the internet or in the television we are so used to see deformities and strange
sights that only the most extreme really catches our attention and usually we
see these people with pity and compassion and not as entertainment. The
sideshow has outlived itself.
Wrong!
The
sideshows lives, breathes and functions better than ever. There are tons of
shows on television trying to show us the weirdest oddities in the world and
thrive on it. I saw a show some time ago about the smallest woman in the world
and I was deeply fascinated. What are gossip magazines but modern sideshows?
Freaks is a
film taking place in the sideshow environment. With the largest ensemble of
deformed people ever assembled for a film you would think this is a movie about
sideshows or at least be a sideshow in itself for the movie audience. Well, I
suppose it is, at least the latter. It certainly still carries its original
impact on the viewer as we stare at all these impossible people. There are a
man without legs, a woman without arms, Siamese twins, a half-man-half-woman, a
bearded women, pinheads and lots of dwarfs and frankly I am fascinated by all
these oddities. Especially the living torso (a man with neither legs nor arms)
engaged me. That is just mind-blowing.
But here is
the really weird thing: I was not feeling sorry for any of these people. In
fact I did not even consider them particularly unfortunate.
The reason
is that our viewpoint is being distorted. In this film the deformed “freaks”
are the normal people. They are true humans. Compassionate, social being that
lives a perfectly normal life. They have worries and sorrows but also joys and
moments of pure happiness and never because of their handicap. The Siamese twins
are engaged to two different men and are really happy. Their men are having
issues with them that may be slightly different from normal relationship, but
still perfectly natural (One man complains about his sister in law because she
want to stay up late to read. A problem because she is attached to his
girlfriend). The human torso and a dwarf are discussing their act while the
torso lights a cigarette. Perfectly normal, except that he lights the cigarette
with his mouth (I love that guy).
Even the
two “normal” people, Phroso (Wallace Ford), the clown and Venus (Leila Hyams)
are hinted at that they carried or carry some sort of deformity themselves.
The real freaks are the normal, un-handicapped
people. Their freakishness is in their minds as intolerance, prejudice and
immorality. They are the hateful people that we should feel sorry for and who
have real issues.
Personally
I love this film. In many ways this is the most sympathetic film I have since
portraying handicapped people, doing it exactly by not portraying them as
handicapped but the heroes I want to root for.
The story
is fairly simply. Hans (Harry Earles), the (rich) dwarf is madly in love with
the “normal” trapeze artist Cleopatra or Cleo (Olga Baclanova), a vicious woman
who only wants to exploit Hans for his money and so plays along. In fact she is
together with the strong man of the circus, Hercules (Henry Victor), an equally
vicious “normal” character. Together they have only scorn for their deformed circus
colleagues and set up a scam to get Hans’ money. Cleo marries Hans and then
kills him with poison and gets his money. Except that they have not counted on
the brotherhood of the “freaks”. They are not letting Hans go down and so save
him from poisoning and take a terrible revenge on the villains. Cleo is somehow
turned into a human chicken to frighten people. She becomes exactly what she
despised the most.
The most
memorable scene of the film is the wedding. This is where we see how tightly
knit a group the ”freaks” are, how they accept each other for better and worse
and offer to accept Cleo into their group. The initiation ritual where
everybody drinks of the same oversized cup and chant “we accept her – one of us”
is strong stuff. And by refusing the cup Cleo reveals her true nature and as
she shouts her curses I actually feel sorry for her because she does not see
the honor which is bestowed upon her. Poor ignorant woman.
We also get
the poignant romance between Hans and Frieda (Daisy Earles, Harry Earles’ real
life sister). They were engaged, but Hans shuts her out when Cleo accepts his favors.
Frieda is mourning this. Not for her own sake, but for Hans because he is
entering a world where he is not seen as a person but a freak to be ridiculed.
It is true
that the acting skills of the handicapped cast are not up to standard, but I
entirely ignore that. To me this film is a gem and a humanistic master piece.
It is food for thought that just a year later Hitler came into power on a
program to eradicate exactly this kind of people.
The genius of this film--as you've rightly noted here--is that it's a story of human oddities that puts "human" first and "oddity" second. We're encouraged to view these people as people and sympathize with them rather than be frightened of or repelled by them, or even to pity them.
ReplyDeleteI love the part where the Human Torso is crawling with a knife in his mouth. I mean, I get why that's a great visual, but what's he going to do with a knife?
I totally love that scene as well. It is absurd, scary and actually very human. He is as filled with anger as anybody else and doing his part. He is my favorite "freak".
DeleteI completely agree that "freak shows" are still all around us. The endless parade of "reality shows" in the U.S. are just one example of this. They exist to get people to watch in horrified fascination at people acting so much worse than themselves.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, and I really do not see the big difference between the traditional sideshow and those tv shows where we are encouraged to laugh at or mock the participants.
DeleteDefinitely agree. To me, the major theme of this film was "love," as you've pointed out as well. Just how much love these "freaks" have in their lives is heart warming. I had forgotten that about this movie (remembering only the ending in the rain, which is also equally iconic but frightening) until I watched it again.
ReplyDeleteI like your analogy to reality television, very apt. Nice review!
Thank you. Because the general theme is love I have been struggling a bit with the ending in the rain, but I have settled on "righteous indignation" as the explanation. It works even though it is tough. Don't mess with the little guys.
Delete