Saturday, 13 April 2013

Casablanca (1942)



Casablanca
This is one I have been looking forward to. “Casablanca” is as legendary and classic as movies get and my expectations were sky high. It has been so many years since I saw it last time and that does strange things to the memory of good things.

Let me say right away that I was not disappointed. To use a phrase from my favorite TV-show “My Kitchen Rules”, it was cooked to perfection.

The setting is Casablanca, Morocco during WWII making this a contemporary film (already there it gets a plus in my book), an almost neutral place controlled by the French Vichy government, officially a vassal of Germany, but in reality fending for itself. Casablanca has at this time become a waypoint for refugees escaping the German occupation on their way to the safe haven of America. Wealthy or important refugees it seems because there is a certain style and class over the international crowd in Casablanca. Unfortunately it is difficult to move on from Casablanca. The next leg is a flight to Lisbon and this requires the highly coveted exit visa. These are notoriously difficult to get. Simple ones can be bought on the black market, but for anybody with a name the only way to get one is through the local police Chief Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains). That is, until two super-visa mysteriously appear (coincidentally with two dead German agents…).

The crowd waiting for an exit visa or stopped by the lack of means to get one flock around the local, classy waterhole: Rick’s Café Americain. The first half hour establishes this environment and atmosphere in Casablanca and particularly in Rick’s Café. People from all of war torn Europe are whispering, plotting, despairing or trying to have a desperate good time in every corner. This is so expertly done that you can feel the tension and danger, but also style and class. This is the romantic, old school version of Chalmuns’ Cantina in Mos Eisley (Star Wars). Above this island rules Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart) a disillusioned, cynical American who keeps a strictly neutral business-only demeanor. That is probably the reason this café works so well in the first place.

 The atmosphere is slowly built up and unless you have seen the movie tons of times or just recently you do not realize exactly when the principal story emerge from the background buzz. When Ugarte (Peter Lorre), a greasy and suspect character approaches Rick to entrust him with two super visa it feels so much in line with everything else happening in Rick’s Café Americain.

A number of things happen now that throws Rick into the eye of the storm. A famous Czech dissident Victor Lazlo (Paul Henreid) shows up as one more refugee trying to get to America. The Germans want him badly and have sent Major Strasser (Conrad Veidt, the somnambulist guy from “Das Cabinet Des Dr. Caligari”!) to make sure he does not leave Casablanca. This makes for some fencing between Major Strasser, Captain Renault and Lazlo, most of which takes place in Rick’s café. We are supposedly on neutral ground, but the threats are thinly veiled. This is an explosive, highly potent situation in which murder and betrayal is not to be ruled out. Lazlo is an idealist and though kept in high esteem by the resistance movements all over Europe he seems to be too naïve and noble for the underhand ways of Casablanca. It is however the company he keeps that makes the eyes pop: Ingrid Bergman as Ilsa Lund! Not only does she make a striking figure, she also has a history with Rick, one that explains why he is in Casablanca and why he has become the person he is. He thought he had forgotten her but “Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine”.

This sets off the great romantic story of Casablanca. We hear Sam (Dooley Wilson) play “As time goes by”, learn how Rick and Ilsa were a couple in Paris and how she never showed up at the train station leaving him broken. The dialogue between the two of them is legendary. Do they still have a thing for each other and why is she now with Victor Lazlo? I will not spoil this too much, just say that this is the stuff legends are made of and seeing them together, hearing “As time goes by”, sends shivers down my spine.

Rick is in a crucial position because he holds the two magic exit visa. Somebody will get off this island, but who will it be? Rumor has it not even the cast or director (Michael Curtiz) knew until the last days of shooting  as the script was changed on a daily basis and some of the magic uncertainty in the expressions of the characters are supposed to come from real uncertainty. The twists the plot takes also take the viewer by surprise, well the virgin viewer, and a lot of heartbreak.

Every second line in Casablanca is a classic line today: “Round up the usual suspects”, “Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship”, “Play it, Sam” and so on. In fact, watching Casablanca you realize how many also lesser known Hollywood tropes originate from this film, making it not only a master piece in itself, but also hugely influential on cinema basically ever since. Take a movie like Raiders of the Lost Ark”. Its description of (pre)war North Africa is straight out of Casablanca. And yet Casablanca feels very different from other films of its time. It is romantic, but less melodrama. It is more open ended in its conclusion and leaves a number of questions unanswered.

Casablanca is also made with a dazzling cast who do theirs to make this movie so enjoyable. Bogey was never better although he is totally recognizable. He is just totally awesome. Bergman is striking and supremely good and her fame is well deserved. It is said that it was her who made Bogart a romantic hero and not just a tough guy and that is probably correct. I am gaining a lot of respect for Claude Rains who is so good as a French officer that I can hardly believe he is the same actor who played Dr. Jaquith in “Now Voyager”. He is very believable. Peter Lorre, always the suspect, almost perverted character. If you wonder why I seek out his films read my comments on “M”. I am less a fan of Paul Henreid, but I guess his aloof style fits the character of Victor Lazlo, yet I would have loved him to be a bit less wooden. He is after all the romantic rival of Bogey.

I am still humming “As time goes by” and watching a bunch of extra material on Casablanca and I feel this “Casablanca” buzz still going through me. Maybe I should see it again, soon. Play it, Sam.

11 comments:

  1. I've yet to review this for many reasons, but the biggest is the unadorned adoration so many classic film fans have for it. I like it a lot, but I don't think it is the greatest romantic adventure film, either. I love Ingrid Bergman, so that is a plus, but I have never been Bogey's biggest fan, so that takes away a little of the shine for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know the feeling. I sometimes see and write of movies that everybody seem to love and I just do not get the vibe and so I feel I have to excuse that I am just not so crazy about it. Well, your opinion is as good as anybody's so you are entitled to think differently.
      Bogart is at the heart of Casablanca so it stands and falls with him.

      Delete
  2. Films like this can be really difficult to write about. They're so revered, so overly analyzed, and so completely beloved.

    "Every second line in Casablanca is a classic line today"--Yeah. Nicely put. I also agree on your takes of the various actors here. Henreid is a bit wooden! And also, welcome to the unofficial Claude Rains fan club.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just read your review and see that we picked up much the same things, like the quotability of the dialogue. I totally love Casablanca and even the weaker elements are fine with me.

      Delete
  3. Great review and a great, great movie. It's one of those I can watch once a year and say "Wow!" every time. I love Claude Rains as well. Probaby my favorite performance of his is as Ingrid Bergman's erstwhile husband in Hitchcock's Notorious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will watch Claude Rains in anything, and I agree, Marie, I adore him in Notorious. Heck, I just adore Notorious.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Marie. It has been far too long since I saw it the last time, but I will promise to see it more often from now on. I have yet to see Notorious, but eventually I will get around to it.

      Delete
  4. "Romantic but less melodrama"

    Very well put, and a very apt description of this film.

    My thing with Casablanca is that this was the first "old film" I saw, as a very young girl, that engaged me. I must have been no older than 11, and my parents were watching it. I didn't intend to watch it, but I did - because it was so entertaining. And that speaks volumes about the film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe that is why it works so well for me. I easily get an overdose of the melodrama, people making a lot of fuss out of things that could easily be resolved. Here we got real issues and heartbreaking decisions and I love it.
      My history with Casablanca was a neighbor at campus who was a huge fan of the film. He had a poster on his door, would wear a trenchcoat and rattle off lines from Casablanca. Every so often he would put the film on and even though I was not into old movies at the time I would sit in on it from time to time.

      Delete
  5. Good review. I agree with pretty much everything you wrote.

    Like Siobhan, this was probably the first classic film I intentionally saw, although I was a young adult when I finally watched it. I knew it was my oldest sister's favorite movie; she had watched it many times when it was broadcast on TV (this was in the days before the home video market.)

    I've found that many of the 1950s and 1960s French, Italian, and Swedish films that supposedly revolutionized the cinema - the ones that get hyped just as much as films like Casablanca - almost always let me down. They never live up to the hype. Casablanca, on the other hand, completely lived up to the hype, as you said.

    I think the reason is simple: Casablanca has an actual storyline that people can identify with. Those later films are beloved by critics precisely because they do not tell stories in a way that engages the audience; some even intentionally alienate the audience. That's what made them revolutionary, but it's also what makes them not live up to the hype for me. Give me Casablanca anyday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is so rare that hyped films work out. I usually find that my expectations ruin the experience for me.
      In this case I had seen it before, I knew it would be good. I had just forgotten how good.

      I am not as negative towards critics as you, but I know what you mean. If I read a review from well-known critics and it get 5 out of 6 I know it is good. If it gets 6 out of 6 it is probably not somthing i am going to like.
      However in later years I have moved more in the direction of the critics and away from the popular votes, so I figure it is also an age thing. Hollywood generally cater to teenagers and they watch a lot of films in the cinema.

      Delete