Mød mig i St. Louis
No doubt
this is one of the CLASSIC film musicals. The fact that I had not seen it before
must be ascribed to my general ignorance and my only recent affinity for
musicals. Probably everybody else on the planet has seen “Meet me in St. Louis”
before.
As with
most musicals its asset is the music and in that respect “Meet me in St. Louis”
is quite overwhelming. The catchy tunes and evergreens are stacked very high
and even the lesser known songs still rummage in the back of my head. “The
Trolley Song”, “Meet me in st. Louis, Louis”, “Skip to M y Lou” and of course,
the biggest of them all, “Wish You a Very Merry Christmas” and that is just an
extract. It is not just that these songs are catchy; they are performed with an
exuberance of emotion (usually happiness) which is absolutely contagious. You
are happy with the happy songs and sad with the sad songs and always
emotionally involved.
The assets
extents to the cast and the set. A film with Judy Garland and Mary Astor (Hail
Mary!) is already a film I must see. Garland is as iconic to this film as she was
to “The Wizard of Oz”, though Astor is a bit more anonymous as the mother of
the family. It is however the youngest of the daughters of the family that I
will remember when all else has faded from memory. Margaret O’Brien as little
Tootsie is a gem. She is a firecracker, a disaster zone, a bandit and the
cutest little girl you can imagine. She reminds me of Calvin of the “Calvin and
Hobbs” cartoons. In a film where everybody are tied to their type and role she
is the maverick who really says what she thinks, does what she want and express
her emotions in an entirely unpretentious manner. Not surprisingly she got a
special Oscar for that achievement. I want to adopt her right there.
The set is
another highlight. This is a reconstruction of 1903 St. Louis filtered with cozy-cozy
filters. There are so many details from cloth to furniture to buildings that I
never tire of looking at all the stuff there. “Meet me in St. Louis” is in
Technicolor and it is so elegantly done that all these many details stand out,
not glaringly like in the Wizard or Robin Hood, but smoothly and friendly like
a painting. It is a pleasure to look at.
Unfortunately
this is also more or less where my endorsement ends.
“Meet Me in
St. Louis” is a girl’s movie in my book. That is not meant as some evil stamp
or disqualifying quality, but simply mean that I do not understand it. I feel
it is not aimed at me and often it fails to generate the feelings or sympathies
it is fishing for while I believe that women in general and the nostalgic
minded in particular would be far more receptive to it.
Let me try
to explain. This is a family of five children. The only boy is quickly shipped
off to college only to return near the end, leaving us with four girls. While
the two youngest are too young it seems that the lives of everyone else
including mother, maid and grandfather revolves around prospective husbands.
That is all there is really. The women all wear these grand costumes, which
only get slightly more practical when working in the kitchen, their single
diversion from finding, evaluating, luring and dreaming of men. Truly these are
princesses and they live on their beautiful castle, their house is no less than
that. They speak and act like princesses and, it seems to me, live in a bubble disconnected
to the real world. The anchor to reality is their father (Leon Ames), the working
husband who has to pay for the menagerie. He is the “king”, yet the women,
obviously thinking that his earthly ways is an interruption, frequently keep
him out of the loop in the family. He is accepted but ignored. Symptomatic his
news of his promotion, added wealth and opportunity for the family is met with
rejection and hostility. He should not touch their world and the fact that he
is the one that makes it all possible is flatly ignored. The movie itself has
chosen side here. We are with the women and supposed to feel that moving away,
indeed any change from this paradise on earth is a grave mistake and disaster,
which makes this the crisis of the film. I know this is a feel-good musical,
but a crisis that I do not even consider a crisis, but an opportunity, is
hardly enough to cause drama.
This is a
movie that celebrates the home, the old ways, the rosy dreams of marriage and
family in an age where everything was better and less confusing, much like
modern films use the fifties as the ideal time to have a family. That is all
very nice, but it tends to get a little too sweet at times and outside of
Christmas season I am not sure I could stomach this again.
The
backdrop of “Meet me in St. Louis is the Second World War. This is 1944 and the
war is raging all over the world. Women are working in factories. Men are
overseas. The future is very uncertain and whatever else it will definitely be
different. No wonder in such an environment it is wonderful to bury yourself in
the fantasy of a better, simpler and more beautiful age. That I can surely
understand
If I could
just get the music, the scenery and little Tootsie I would be just fine. That I
do not mind at all. Tootsie rules.
This will come as no shock: I hated this film. I'll grant that the music, the production value, and the angelic voice of Judy Garland all work as positives for this film. That said, I found the characters to be relentlessly awful.
ReplyDeleteI do not know if they are as bad as that, but the tone of the movie supports this very reactionary worldview that the characters represent. It is like a support argument for anti-suffragettes.
DeleteFor what it's worth, I never saw this film until I watched it for the list.
ReplyDeleteI think you hit the nail on the head in that it was definitely going for nostalgia of simpler times because of what was going on in the world when it was made.
Like everyone else I liked the songs in the film. Like you, I was irritated by the reaction to the father's job change, said job being the thing keeping them in their fancy dresses.
Thank you! Yeah, isn't that so? Their reaction is in line with the mission of the film, but it bothers me so. They seem rather spoiled.
DeleteHowever you see this attitude even today, albeit watered down a bit. Resistance to change has alway made successful movies.
Great and understandable review!
ReplyDeleteI have a huge soft spot for this movie. The last time I watched it was the day some idiot in Helsinki where I was living at the time shot a bunch of random people in a shopping mall. I started sobbing in the movie where the father says they don't have to go to New York. New York = harsh reality, in this case. The film must have been similarly cathartic for people living with the worry and hardship of WWII.
Then again, I am a girl.
Thank you.
DeleteThat I can imaging. Helsinki is such a peaceful place and then suddenly people go absolutely banana. Meet me in St. Louis is like a deep blanket to hide under and it serves/served its purpose I suppose.
I am sorry you had to experience that.