Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed
”The
Adventures of Prince Achmed”, or ”Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed” as is the
original title, is a stunning animated feature created more than a decade
before Disney’s “Snowwhite and the Seven Dwarfs”. “Prince Achmed” is a
silhouette puppet show as they are known particularly in the Far East but also
in Europe in the 19th century before the cinema made this kind of
projected shows old-fashioned. Except the characters here are not puppets
controlled by a puppeteer with strings and sticks, but frame by frame animated
silhouettes on a backlit and tinted surface. The effect is beautiful and quite
stunning as these literal outlines take on a life of their own.
In simpler
silhouette animation each character would just be a single cut-out being moved
around on the background, but in “Prince Achmed” there are so many moving
parts, even the individual fingers, that the artificial element, which of
course is quite obvious given that we are taking black silhouettes, fades away
and we have a true animated world.
The woman
behind “Prince Achmed” was called Lotte Reiniger. She was a pioneer in this
style of animation and with her team she worked 3 years to make this film. I am
still wondering how she did it. The details are so many, the outlines on each
silhouette so full of fine and delicate element that it must have been an
insane job to cut them. The skirt of the princess and the cape of the prince
both consist of latticework of minute detail. I can understand how you would do
this on a computer but in the mid-twenties it was just you and a knife and a
camera on a glowbox. The achievement is also highlighted by comparison with the
later works of Lotte Reiniger also included on the DVD I got. None of them
measures up to “Prince Achmed” in technical excellence.
The story
of the film will inevitably take backseat to the technical achievement. Without
knowing the background in full detail it seems to me that it is a medley of
stories from “1001 night” combined into an adventurous journey. Our hero, the
prince, inadvertently flies away from Bagdad on a magic flying horse belonging
to a wicked sorcerer. Achmed gets the horse under control and finds a nice girl
who unfortunately is guarded by some jealous demons in the wonderfully named
country of Wak-Wak. They manage to get away only to be caught by the Emperor of
China. Everything turns sour for Achmed who finds himself up against an
emperor, a sorcerer and a bunch of demons. Fortunately he finds some allies
namely a badass witch and a fellow called Aladdin who used to have a lamp of
the more useful kind. The witch and Achmed help Aladdin get the lamp back and
together they take on the sorcerer and free the girl and as a nice bonus
Aladdin gets a magic castle and the princess, Achmed’s sister.
The
adventure surely has all the elements of an exciting fairytale, but somewhere
between the very two-dimensional world and the over the top fantastic elements
the story itself loses its grip on me. I was not overly interested in this
story. I was much more interested in the technical aspects and just kept wondering
how on Earth she did it.
The
original was lost in Berlin in 1945 as another casualty of a conflict that had
nothing to do with the film, but fractions survived abroad and were pieced
together in the reconstruction. The film came with an original score by
composer Wolfgang Zeller, years before sound film, and that was added to the
restored version. There is also a narrated version in English which I did not
see. I felt that the version with the score would be closer to the original
experience and it certainly fits very well.
“The
Adventures of Prince Achmed” should first of all be seen for the technical and
artistic achievement it is and that is really reason enough. I believe it
deserves its newly acquired spot on The List.
I agree. This is a really special film, and in retrospect, it's one of the ones I'm the happiest was added. Honestly, it should've been there from the first.
ReplyDeleteYes indeed. I read that it is the oldest animated feature length film to survive. If nothing else, that should be reason enough.
DeleteI also liked this quite a bit. Like you I marvelled over how intricate some of the cutouts were.
ReplyDeleteThey are absolutely amazing. I still cannot understand how she did it.
DeleteIt definitely deserves the spot. I agree that the technical achievements are the big draw, but it's also pretty interesting on the narrative side too for the time period. Still, the main attention for me was on the style.
ReplyDeleteCertainly, no doubt about that. I hardly need a story for something this beautiful.
ReplyDelete