Farligt Møde
I know
Hitchcock is a bit of a one-trick pony and that if you try long enough
eventually you will get it right, but there is just no way around it, ”Strangers
on a Train” is the most effective suspense thriller on the List so far. No exaggerations
are needed in describing this movie, it is literally a film that finds me at
the edge of my seat, a film that forces me to look away when the suspense is
peaking, a film that is daring me to continue. This is a film from a Hitchcock
in top shape.
Farley
Granger, the accomplish with second thoughts in “Rope”, is back as a professional
tennis player, Guy Haines, who again is faced with a lunatic dreaming of
perfect murders. This time it is not a facistoid student with ideas of superior
beings but a true and very entertaining nutcase, Bruno Anthony in the shape of
Robert Walker. Guy is riding on a train when he is approached by Bruno. Bruno
seems to know all about his private life and the particular predicament he is
in. Guy is having a not so secret relationship with Anne Morton (Ruth Roman), a
senator’s daughter while being unhappily married to the promiscuous Miriam
Haines (Laura Elliott). Bruno is presenting him with a fantastic plan where he
kill Miriam in return for which Guy will kill Bruno’s father. Guy is laughing
it off as a (tasteless) joke and thinks no further of it until Miriam is found
dead and Bruno seeks him out to fulfill his part of the deal.
Bruno
Walker is a great character. Imagine Bill Murray transplanted back to 1951
being his usual underplayed crazy self. Something like “What about Bob?”.
Robert Walker is so similar to Bill Murray that I would not be surprised if
somebody told me they were somehow related. And Bill Murray is my favorite
actor ever. End. Bruno Anthony is clearly a mental case, but with rich parents
he is also privileged and does more or less what he feels like. He is charming
and fun and very clever but also a total psychopath. In a scene we see his loving
mother deriding him for his funny ideas like blowing up the White House, so we
know he has a history of mad stuff before this round. When Guy does not follow
through with his end of Bruno’s brilliant plan he first decides to remind him a
bit and when that is not enough he starts pestering him and keeps showing up at
the most inconvenient moments.
From Guy
Haines end this is a nightmare. Yes, he hated his wife, but he would never have
killed her. Or would he? That is what people around him are starting to think.
And the fact that he did have that conversation with Bruno. Does that not make
him an accomplish? That is what Bruno is trying to impress on him and he half
think it himself. With one hand he is a public figure about to be married into
an even more public family and with public aspirations in politics. On the
other hand he is being stalked by this mad person who is trying to drag him
into some crazy murder scheme. Suddenly he is very much alone.
Hitchcock
has created a very clever movie where he balances the very morbid suspense
theme with a very dark comedic theme. He has certainly done this before,
numerous times, so often in fact that you could blame him for making the same
movie over and over and with some right. In the case of “Strangers on a Train”
he just manages to get that balance exactly right so that we feel the nightmare
of Guy Haines and still can be amused of that lunatic Bruno Anthony. This could
so easily have gone over the top and become an outright comedy. Not just
because of Robert Walker’s character, but also because of the crazy stunts this
forces the Anne Morton and her sister Barbara (Patricia Hitchcock, Alfred’s
daughter) into. In a less expert hand it probably would, but Hitchcock manages
to maintain the balance, even in the final and almost ridiculous showdown on
the carousel. That is no simple feat.
At first I
was a bit disappointed that Hitchcock had gone back to black and white
considering how well he made the colors work in “Rope”, but in fact “Strangers
on a Train” has so many noir elements going that this movie just had to be made
with lots of dark shadows. Guy Haines has to feel that Bruno is some sort of
dark alter ego, a crazy child within himself that is haunting him. That just
would not work half as well in color.
My DVD
comes with a British release version that should make Bruno even more of a
lunatic and one of these days I will try that version. Certainly this is a movie
that can handle a re-watch.
There's a part of me that thinks Strangers on a Train is a iittle overrated. There are times when Hitchcock attempts to create tension by just drawing out a scene. It's really good for what it is, but Hitch got better in the following years. It might make my Top-10 Hitchcock films, but if it does, it does so just barely.
ReplyDeleteThat may well be. My reference however is his previous work and compared to them this is top notch. It is too long ago I saw his later movies and my recollection is too rusty. I think this movie was really awesome and I would like to see him top this.
DeleteThis is definitely in my top 5 Hitchcock. Robert Walker steals the film. It's even more remarkable after seeing him in all the young soldier/sailor roles I've watched him in lately. I just love that tennis sequence. And Pat Hitchcock. My first clue that the movie would be great was the shots of the two mens' shoes.
ReplyDeleteThis is Robert Walker's film, totally. The similarity to Bill Marray is just uncanny and that is a plus in my book. The tennis game was a bit stretched out to my liking but as soon as it was done the movie picked up pace again.
DeleteI loved the bit where he's trying to complete the tennis match and it goes into a third set. You can feel his anxiousness. I like other Hitchcock movies more than this, though. You'll get to them later in the list.
ReplyDeleteI am sure that, but I also think that he is closing in the right formula with this one.
DeleteAt that stage of the tennis game I think I was ready to move on.It is a bit drawn out.