Pandora og Den Flyvende Hollænder
Merry
Christmas to all of you.
In between
eating solid Christmas fare and playing with my son and all his new toys I have
found time to watch “Pandora and the Flying Dutchman”. This movie was replaced
in the Danish edition of the List by the Swedish movie “Hon Dansade en Sommar”
and so apparently the editors ranked this movies the least important of the
original 1951 picks. I cannot say that I entirely disagree.
Let me
start with what is good about this movie: It features Ava Gardner and James
Mason.
There is no
way around it, Ava Gardner has to be one of the prettiest and most alluring
actresses of the era and in this movie everything was done to emphasize all her
becoming attributes. That is an understatement really. She is ultra hot. The
colors emphasize her luscious lips and makes her flawless face… well flawless.
Having her enter the yacht (of the Flying Dutchman) wrapped only in sail canvas
is a promise of sex as the ever was one and her manners and acting all the way
through the movie backs up this impression. Her role is to drive men crazy and
while I often have a problem with female leads supposed to have, but ultimately
lacking, this ability, this is one case where it works. The only problem here
is that sometimes you can really see how much the director/ cinematographer/
costume department worked to emphasize this point. She always seems to wear
dresses that serves her delectable bosom to the men around her and no matter
what she does she appears to have just left the cosmetics shop prior to
shooting. Yet, I forgive them when the result is so gorgeous.
The selling
feature of James Mason is his voice. It is one of those British voices I can
listen to for hours and in this movie he gets amply opportunity to exercise it.
Frankly, he could read the phone directory and I would be mesmerized. Couple
that with his brooding gaze and you have a very compelling man with a very dark
secret.
Sounds great,
does it not?
Unfortunately
this is where greatness ends for this movie. I disliked practically everything
else about it.
Part of it
of course is the poor state of the print itself. I found it as a Spanish import
in bad need of restoration. This is how movies look and sound before the magic
restoration process. Grainy picture, faded colors, rusty sound and almost
random cutting clearly indicating that somebody has already cut away the worst
parts, but not cared overly much exactly where they placed the cut. It is a
shame really when you have a master like Jack Cardiff on board that the colors
come out so poorly.
But
technical state besides those are not the real problems this movie has to
struggle with.
The premise
of the story is ludicrous to begin with. That a 300 year old ghost of a sea
captain shows up on the beachfront as a dashing hunk, his salt spattered
merchantman turned into a luxury yacht, on a quest to find his lost love. Match
this with the larger than life man-eating femme fatale who in-between munching
up men gets ensnared with the captain. Their love, doomed, fatal, but oh, so
romantic is given from the start. Frankly this stuff belong on the pink pages
of women’s magazines as cheap novellas and not in a big movie production. It is
just revulsive.
Add to this
that practically all dialogue is framed as declarations or recitations of
poetry and we are far beyond fairy tales and long into pretentious bull shit.
It is a failed attempt at being high-brow and instead aims at the lowest
instincts. Sort of the plebeian impression of what high art must look like.
Sticky, nauseating and, yes, stupid.
The central
statement is that love can be measured by what you will give up for it. So,
Steven (Nigel Patrick) offers his beloved racing car for Pandora (Ava Gardner),
Demerest (Marius Goring) kills himself and Montalvo (Mario Cabre) commits
murder for Pandora. Pandora herself must give up her life to be with the
Captain while the Captain must give up… no wait, he is not giving up anything.
He needs Pandora in order to break the curse on him. If anything he much snatch
the blossom, but in the shape of Ava Gardner I think that is a price that most
men could live with.
My claim
here is that this central statement is another round of romantic bull shit.
Hey, everybody wants to be loved and it is kind of flattering that somebody
prefers you to something otherwise dear to them, but really, if you loved
somebody and not just yourself, would you really want to force that choice? To
make them select, to make them loose something precious? Is that not the ultimate
cruelty? If you love somebody, you love the package and you love that your sweetheart
cares for other things as well, otherwise you are just a succubus, eating you
partner dry.
I may be
overreacting a bit here. Romanticism loves this premise and audiences at all
times have cried themselves senseless over this very issue, but to me it is
most infuriating and when a movie is as devoted to this idea as this one is it
just makes me mad.
The funny
thing is that I actually like that the movie dares to play with the fantastic. Today
every second movie has a fantastic element, but in the early fifties this was a
rarity. Of course Hollywood in particular excelled in putting up unrealistic
scenarios, but they were generally confined to the real world. Fantastic
elements have the ability, like science fiction, to extrapolate ideas so we can
consider them in a different and unusual light and in addition, provides some
much needed escapism. In that light it just saddens me when the topic under
consideration is as silly as this one. It belongs in women’s weeklies in the
hairdresser parlour.
Ultimately
I ended up disconnecting from the story and resigned myself to watch and listen
to Gardner and Mason. They almost make it worth watching this movie and I
wonder what it would be like watching these two in a better movie.
As it happens, I was mildly fond of this movie, almost despite Ava Gardner, who I tend to not care for. James Mason is a big reason. I agree that it doesn't belong on The List, though. There's not enough here, and while the fantasy elements are interesting, there are better romances out there.
ReplyDeleteYes, it is curious how beauty (and presence) is in the eye of the beholder. So far I have had no reason to be disappointed with Gardner, but that is just my personal opinion. Mason is a rising star in my mind and I have come to look forward to movies featuring him and his voice. Unfortunately at the end of the day the story itself is what matters to me and that just did not cut it in this case.
DeleteI also liked this one to a certain extent. The legend of the Flying Dutchman is an old one, but not one I have seen very much (if at all) in a movie. This meant that aspect of it was fresh for me.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Gardner is very pretty and I felt that the best Kate Beckinsale has looked onscreen was when she was playing Gardner in the film The Aviator.
Well, it seems I am in minority here.
DeleteI do not think I am really objecting to the Flying Dutchman tale per se, but something with the presentation here makes it get stuck in my throat.
Gardner (as a character) was in The Aviator? I think I must see that movie again.
She was one of Hughes' girlfriends. She didn't have as much screen time as Cate Blanchett playing Katherine Hepburn. Beckinsale put on some weight to realistically look like how actresses did back then and I felt she looked great because her bones weren't sticking out everywhere and she actually had some curves.
DeleteI really do not remember much else from this movie than the despondency of DiCaprio's character. Definitely a rewatch
Delete