Illusionernes By
The first
thing I noticed about ”The Bad and the Beautiful” was the cast. Kirk Douglas,
Lana Turner, Dick Powell and Gloria Graham. Those names alone was enough to
make me very interested. Each one has starred in excellent films and indeed
made them excellent, so setting them up together can only be interesting… with
a considerable chance of too many chefs…
The next
thing I noticed was that this was an inside film on Hollywood. I cannot say
that made me as excited. The theme du jour of the early fifties seems to have
been inside Hollywood films. Although I am not complaining, the films so far
have been outstanding, I do think this theme is starting to get a bit old on
me. There was therefore a cause for concern here. Was this starting to be like
the introspect musicals about setting up a musical from the early thirties?
No need to
worry though. This may be an inside story and it may help if you know something
of the background of notorious Hollywood celebrities, but even coming in blank
this is a most entertaining movie carried not just by strong acting
performances, but also by an interesting and in many respects novel story. The
closest thing I can think of is “Citizen Kane”. If you do know a bit about the
personalities in Hollywood you will recognize the types portrayed in this
movie.
Like “Citizen
Kane” The Bad and the Beautiful” is a portrait of a notorious person through
the testimony of those who know him and like Kane they all detest him, but also
respect him and if they had to be entirely honest with themselves they would
probably have to admit that they also care for him.
The man is
Johnathan Shields (Kirk Douglas). His trademarks is to burn with passion for
his projects, to always get what he wants and a charming personality that moves
people to do what he wants. He is manipulative and entirely without scruples,
and if he has to sacrifice somebody on the way so be it. It is not money he
wants, but something bigger, to create greatness on film. It is easy to name a
number of Hollywood producers that fits the bill and David O. Selznick’s name
keeps popping up the same way as William Hearst did for “Citizen Kane”.
Certainly there are some bloated egos to choose from.
The story
of Johnathan Shields is told by three characters he burned on the way. The have
all been called in to a meeting with Harry Pebbel (Walter Pidgeon) who
represents Johnathan and wants them to answer a long distance phone call from
him. Each of the three in turn tell how they got backstabbed by Johnathan and
why they would never ever consider working for him again.
First is
Fred Amiel (Barry Sullivan), the director. He met Johnathan when he was entirely
blank at Johnathan’s father’s funeral. The father was an extremely unpopular
head of a film studio who managed to ruin it. Johnathan takes up the gauntlet
and wows to create his own name as producer. Together Fred and Johnathan learn
the trade making shorts and B-movies on non-existing budgets, but when time
comes for the big break Johnathan take Fred’s screenplay and not only takes
credit for it but also hand it over to another, established director. Fred is
understandably bitter and leaves Johnathan to become an Oscar winning director
in his own right.
Next is the
actress Georgia Lorrison (Lana Turner). She is the wrecked daughter of a dead movie
star. Although she is dabbling herself in acting, her lack of confidence and
considerable alcohol abuse is preventing her from taking it anywhere. The
shadow of her father is simply too big. Johnathan changes that. He sees star
quality in her and insist on making her his star. The angle he chooses is to
seduce her. With his overwhelming charm he has no problem convincing her that
they are in love and this carries her through and makes her deliver top
performance. But on the eve of the premiere he burns her and tells her it was
all a scam when she finds him with another (cheap) bimbo. Georgia wows to never
work for him again but moves on to become one of the greatest of Hollywood’s
stars.
Last is the
screenwriter James Lee Bartlow (Dick Powell). He started out as a college
professor in Virginia where he was discovered by Johnathan. Johnathan lures him
to Hollywood where he grudgingly accepts a job as screenwriter for Johnathan.
James has a pigeon brained, but sweet wife, Rosemary (Gloria Graham) who keeps interrupting
his work and Johnathan realizes that he has to get her out of James hair if he
wants any work out of him. He charges his Latin lover star Ribera (Gilbert
Roland) with the job to entertain her and this works brilliantly. Finally James
Lee becomes the screenwriter Johnathan knew he would be. Unfortunately Ribera
also outperformed himself and ran away with Rosemary only to crash in a plane
on the way to Mexico. When James find out Johnathan is behind this he leaves him
for good and becomes in turn one of the highest paid of Hollywood’s
screenwriters and a Pulitzer Prize winner.
Each of the
stories are told with a great deal of bitterness, but there is no denying that
Johnathan created them. When Johnathan who crashed big time after trying his
own hand at directing asks his three creations to help him start a new project
the answer is an immediate no. Yet hardly are they out of the door before they
eagerly have to hear Johnathan describe this new project.
The
greatness of this movie is the complexity of the portrait of Johnathan Shields.
It is both condemning and glorifying him and the amalgamation is a person of
both black and white. Johnathan Shields is a devil and a hero, an genius and a
self-obsessed bozo, but most of all a man with a burning passion for making
film, what we in Danish call an “ildsjæl” (fire-soul). This movie could easily
have landed on each site of the road and have created a monster or a saint, but
it manages to stay on the road throughout, in fact better than “Citizen Kane”
did, and gives us a whole, but exceptional person.
This is by
far the best movie I have seen so far by Vincente Minnelli. In my mind he is
synonymous with pretty, but ultimately mediocre musicals and this movie is so
far from that comfort zone that I had to look twice. He did pretty well with
this one and I should not write him off so early.
The cast as
I mentioned in the opening is outstanding and I am especially pleased to see
Dick Powell again. “Murder my Sweet” was a rebirth for him and I enjoy what he
became in this part of his career. Because the story is told in three separate acts
all these stars avoid being in each other’s way, but are allowed to shine in
their own right.
I think
this movie is more a character study than a portrait of an industry and that is
why it should be seen. Johnathan Shields is an interesting character type.
Insufferable yes, but interesting, and certainly big enough to warrant a movie.
Thumbs up
from me.
Thumbs up from me too. Another Vincente Minnelli movie you might like that has some of the harder edge of this one is Some Came Running. I don't know off hand if it is on The List.
ReplyDeleteThat sounds like a movie worth seeking out. Otherwise I have not been overly impressed by him.
ReplyDeleteYou liked this a little more than I did, I think, but I did like it. I included it among the films I reviewed for my Gloria Graham category. I agree they balance off the main man, but it seemed clear that we were ultimately supposed to root for him.
ReplyDeleteI will check out your review, Chip. I had forgotten you did that Graham theme.
DeleteI do not know if we are supposed to root for Johnathan. The rooting business is mostly for his three victims. Johnathan is a force of nature and therefore interesting. You do not really have to like him.
You can find it here:
Deletehttp://tipsfromchip.blogspot.com/2013/12/movie-bad-and-beautiful-1952.html
I liked this film a great deal too. Definitely ahead of its time and your comparison to Citizen Kane is pretty accurate. I do like Vincent Minnelli more than you, but I do agree that this was indeed a change of pace for him.
ReplyDelete