Guldkareten
After a
long absence on the List Jean Renoir is finally back and this time in
Technicolor.
I am sure
Renoir was not idle in Hollywood, but apparently his golden age was the
thirties while he was still in France. Maybe he just had to get back to Europe
to find himself again. With “Le Carosse d’or” (or “The Goden Coach”) he is
truly back in Europe. It is a French-Italian coproduction filmed in Cinecitta
in Rome where the actors are supposed to speak Spanish, but actually speak English.
Essentially how movies work in Europe today…
“Le Carosse
d’or” is a bit of an oddity. At least I have some difficulty categorizing it. I
finally decided it is a comedy, mostly based on a number of farcical scenes and
a light mood in many of the scenes. But there is also something else, a gravity
that is strangely at odds with the farce elements. So far I have not yet
decided if that is good or bad but it does leave me with an uneasy feeling.
The story
takes place in some South American town, most likely Peru, in the eighteenth
century. An Italian acting troupe has made the journey to the new world, obviously
on some false pretense that this would be a super-rich place only to find
themselves stranded in a backwater with a pigsty for a theater.
The troupe
is an odd mix of actors, singers, musicians and acrobats and comes with a horde
of children. The most prominent character in the troupe is Camilla (Anna
Magnani) who is a bit of everything and a magnet for the attention of their
audience, the men in town and for us, the viewers. It is not because Magnani is
classic eye-candy, she is no Ava Gardner or Grace Kelly, but she has a presence
like few others. Anna Magnani owns the screen. She is funny, loud, direct,
tender and we are soon as much in love with her as all her suitors. Anna Magnani
is the primary reason to watch this movie. Last time I saw her was in “Roma,
Citta Aperta” and that was a very different kind of movie. Now instead we see
her as comedian and that fits her so well.
The troupe
soon becomes a big success in town and among the fans are three men who all
court Camilla. The first one is Felipe (Paul Campbell), who was arriving in
town together with the troupe as some kind of companion. He obviously consider
Camilla his girlfriend, but she clearly is not on the same page as he is. Oh,
she likes him, but she does not really consider them a thing.
Secondly
there is Ramon, the bull fighter (Riccardo Rioli). He is the macho-man who
expects everybody to tremble before him and is quite the local celebrity. He
wants Camilla as if she was one of the bulls he fights. Since this is mostly a
comedy Ramon comes off as a self-indulgent bozo, who is always there at the
wrong time being insanely jealous. But in the deeper moments he represents
masculinity where Felipe represents love.
The last and
most interesting of Camilla’s suitors is the Viceroy himself, played by Duncan
Lamont. He goes by the name Ferdinand, but nobody seems to call him anything
but the Viceroy. He is a bit of a dandy with his foppish court, which seems to
do its utmost to keep up with the standards of the European higher nobility. The
Viceroy seems to be all over the place. Sneaking out among commoners in
disguise, spending a fortune on an imported golden coach, offhand with his girlfriends
and nonchalant toward the courtiers. For him falling in love with Camilla seems
to be just another one of those things that happen. For an impulsive type his
huge advantage is that he has the power and wealth to act on it and soon he has
outmaneuvered the other suitors through simple bribery. Some expensive jewelry,
a nice apartment and access to the court and Camilla is all in. To top it off
the Viceroy even gives her the golden coach. The Viceroy represents wealth.
Camilla,
who is used to scramble for every bit of coin is not one who says no to all
these gifts. All those things are actual wealth, not to be dismissed. She also
has no sympathy to the troubles of the rich. How can the rich have any
problems?
But soon things
gets serious for Camilla. The Viceroy may be losing his seat because the
nobility is fed up with his squandering their money and bringing in lowborns to
the court. He is willing to give it all up for Camilla, but now she knows the
ugly games of the wealthy. Ramon is back with none of the softness of the
nobility, but offering her a real man. The love of this man however is a prison
where she is reserved only for him. Finally Felipe is back from some soldiering
in the wilderness. He offers a love none of the others can match, but the price
is giving up everything she has. Nothing can she bring with her to the jungle.
What is a
girl to do? She refuses them all and in one of the stranger scenes steps out of
the film and on to a stage. I am not sure what it all means, but my guess is that
she decides that she is first of all an actress and her family is the troupe.
She cannot leave that.
I may be
wrong in the interpretation. The end was rather confusing to me and although
this is supposed to be the deeper part of the movie it also feels like the
weakest.
The
strongest on the other hand is the bizarre council meeting where the viceroy is
storming through the room like a pendulum trying to placate two fuming girlfriends
and every time he thinks things are back under control Camilla will play some
guitar and throw him into a new fit. This is truly funny to watch and even
better with flying wigs and dandy costumes.
“Le carosse
d’or” is funny when it wants to be and it is very much borne by a strong
performance from Anna Magnani. But it is also a movie that wants to be more
than just a comedy and that part feels messy. I enjoyed the movie more than I
thought I would, but as for mixing comedy and social critique, a Renoir specialty,
he was way better in the thirties with “La Règle du jeu”, “Grand Illusion” and “La
Marseillaise”.
I saw the opening and closing scenes as framing devices of making this a stage play within a movie - an early example of being "meta", if you will.
ReplyDeleteI liked this movie, but I prefer other Renoir films more.
Yes, I think you are right about that. They frame the story. Renoir did something like that in his early movies too. I am just wondering if it is supposed to mean something else as well.
DeleteI haven't seen this for years and remember very little about it other than the setting. Not a particularly good sign. I'm always up for even mediocre Renoir though. I think the best film from his later years is The River (1951), which was made in India. Naturally that didn't make the List.
ReplyDeleteMediocre Renoir is better than most movies and this is not a bad one. I just expect more from him.
DeleteThe river sounds like a movie I should seek out.
I think you should! I don't know if you've seen any of Sayajit Ray's film's yet (his Apu Trilogy is coming up on the list) but The River is also interesting in that both he and his cinematographer got their starts there.
ReplyDelete