Fotomodeller jages
Quite by
coincidence I am on to another psychopathic killer movie. “Peeping Tom” follows
right on the tail of “Psycho” last week and it is entirely fitting. Those two
would make an excellent double feature.
Where
“Psycho” was leading us to believe that the nice guy at the motel is actually a
nice guy and not a mad killer, “Peeping Tom” goes the completely opposite
way. Right from the opening we know that
Mark Lewis (Karlheinz Böhm) goes around killing people. Only then do we learn
that Mark is actually a nice and gentle boy who struggling with some personal
demons that makes him kill people. It sounds like an impossible task. How can
you make a crazy killer sympathetic? A man you would actually root for? But
Michael Powell, director and producer, actually accomplishes just that and that
is in my opinion what makes this movie special.
Gradually
through the movie we are let into Marks world, a truly strange and horrifying
place. We see how he was ruined as a child by a sadistic father who did fear
experiments on him and filmed it all. The result of that upbringing is an
obsession with filming anything, everything really, and hunt for that perfect
image of fear as people watch themselves die. It is clear that Mark get off on
those images. Even the thought of them makes him sexually aroused and the
murders seem to be orgastic release for him. This is seriously weird stuff, way
beyond dressing up as a dog or hanging out with plastic dolls and a perversion
far ahead of its time.
Personally
I have some problem following the logic of his particular affliction. It does
not really make sense and it gives me the nasty suspicion that his condition is
deliberately gory and extreme, but then, I am not a psychiatrist, I have no
idea if this sort of psychosis is a real thing. It bothers me because repelling
as it is we get to like Mark and I want to understand why gets suck a kick out
of filming people watching their own death.
Between
working on a film set and going around killing people for kicks Mark meets a nice
girl. Helen (Anna Massey) is a tenant is the big house Mark’s father left him
who is endeared by the shy and gently boy. She wants to get to know him, but
has clearly no idea what she is walking into. Mark falls in love with Anna
immediately in part because he is desperate to reach out for someone to help
him, yet, understandably, afraid what such a person would think of him. This
part is quite interesting, both because we learn a lot about Mark, but also
because I get strangely torn between hoping Anna can help him and urging her to
get out of his reach that he does not kill her too.
Mark is of
course a lost cause. The police is closing in on him and his relationship with
Anna can only end in disaster. His secret is not something you can just learn
to live with. The question is merely which disaster will happen first. However
Mark has planned that moment and know exactly how he wants to check out.
There are a
number of interesting elements to this movie. First of all why choose an actor
with a distinct German accent as Mark? It is never explained, but I think it is
with the war in mind, that at this time the British public would associate a
German accent with a sadistic nazi villain.
Another
element is the theme of voyeurism. Mark is not the only one who gets a kick out
of watching. There is a great scene in the newsagent shop with an older man
eager to buy pornography, but shy about it when a school girl enter the shop.
Maybe a way of saying that voyeurism is a common thing, though in my book there
is a big step up from porn to murder.
Then the
movie has a whole meta thing going with the film set Mark is working at. A film
about the process of making a film.
Powell has
sprinkled humoristic elements over the movie, particularly on the film set, but
also in scenes involving the police. I am not sure I like that levity. Mark’s
affliction deserves to be taken serious and the silliness attenuates some of
the bite. Normally I like that break in depressive movies, but here I find it
unfitting.
My favorite
character of the entire movie must be Anna’s mother, Mrs. Stephens (Maxine
Audley). She is blind and therefore cannot be a voyeur and perhaps therefore
she possesses more clarity than any other character. Also she is one sharp
woman with a dry wit.
All in all “Peeping
Tom” is a daring movie that does thing we are not (or were not) used to
watching. It is cleverly made and swings itself up to an impressive level of
suspense. It is impossible not to compare it to Psycho and in that comparison I
think “Peeping Tom” falls short. I understand intuitively what is happening to
Norman Bates and why he thinks as he does, but Mark is simply too far out. I
simply cannot relate to his sexual obsession. But then again, I would hate to
have another end sequence with a psychologist lecturing on his condition. Mark’s
spectacular demise must and should speak for itself.
They did, in fact, make a great double feature. The truth is that I only knew to do these on the same day because I'd already seen both of them. I watched Peeping Tom the first time because I made my school librarian buy a copy for our collection.
ReplyDeleteI like Peeping Tom a little more than Psycho because it's a lot more daring than Psycho. Psycho puts us in a position where we are more or less forced to sympathize with someone who is a psychotic killer. Peeping Tom tells us in the first 10 minutes who the killer is and still makes us sympathize with him.
I do agree that Powell goes further than Hitchcock and the achievement to make us like the murderer is more impressive, but there is also something slightly artificial about Mark where I completely buy Norman. Plus all the externals where Hitch is just that bit better than Powell. Except for that ridiculous inclusion of the doctor in the end. Powell wins on the ending.
DeleteWell, here's one we can agree on! It's hard for me to pick between Psycho and Peeping Tom. Probably will always depend on which I have seen last. Right now I can't forget Psycho's score and some of the bravura sequences.
ReplyDeleteIt is not an easy choice and not one we are forced to make. I can live with liking them both.
Delete