Lys i mørket
There is
something very intense about Bergman’s movies in general. Characters are
fighting internal battles with themselves, with their Gods or demons or, well
whatever else that troubles them. When you get that inner struggle his movies
are great. When you don’t, well, then you are in for a hard time. That is why
Bergman is hit or miss.
This is
particularly true for Winter Light (odd English title for what translates as
“participants in the communion”) as there is little else in this movie than
those internal battles.
I may
understand the worries the characters in “Winter Light” have on an intellectual
level, but they also feel alien enough that I have to strain to comprehend
them. That makes “Winter Light” a difficult movie.
Central to
“ Winter Light” is the priest Tomas Ericsson (Gunnar Björnstrand). He is the
gloomy and serious looking priest of two small congregations in the Swedish
outback. Behind the façade however, Tomas is a troubled man. He feels left by
God and is rather bitter about it. For a priest that is pretty bad and Tomas
does take it badly.
Since his
wife died four years earlier he has struggled to find a meaning with his
existence and he has found none. God is not helping him at all and God’s
silence is making Tomas bitter. In fact his internal struggle dominates
everything he says or does. He seems blind to the people who seek his help, and
instead of assistance or understanding he lashes out in bitterness. His eye is
turned inward instead of outward. In the movie this is exemplified by Jonas
Persson (Max von Sydow in an uncharacteristic minor role), who is terribly
afraid that the Chinese will nuke Sweden, and by Märta Lundberg (Ingrid
Thulin), who genuinely cares for him and wants a bit of attention in return.
In the case
of Jonas, Tomas should have been listening and supporting Jonas. Instead he is
telling him that life is pointless and without hope, based on his own misery.
Jonas subsequently shoots himself, thank you for nothing. For Märta Tomas has
no room in his life. Märta’s attention is unwanted and oppressive to him. If
his mind is 100% filled with himself, how can she demand a piece of his
attention and care as well? How can she demand that he should receive and
return her love?
Frankly the
egomanic Tomas is not very sympathetic and it is frustrating to see that the
meaning he is looking for, the divine element is right before him, yet his egomaniac
obsession prevents him from recognizing it. I felt like screaming at him, but
it would have been to no avail. No amount of imploring could have opened his
mind. He was too far gone in his self-pity.
Near the
end Tomas has a conversation with Algot Frövik (Allan Edwall), a sexton, which
I suspect is key to the movie. Algot says that Jesus greatest suffering was
that he though God had left him, there on the cross. This, I suppose, would
compare Tomas suffering to that of Jesus’ and in Christianity it just does not
get bigger than that. Exactly what effect that has on Tomas is not clear to me.
He simply proceeds to give service to an empty church. It makes the story feel
unresolved, but I am probably missing something as usual.
Those heavy
stone churches, grave priests and empty churches are very familiar to me.
Except for the snow this could have been in Denmark. I was surprised to note
that this was already the case in 1963. It could easily have played out in 2017
and I guess that makes the story relevant today. It just does not feel that
relevant to me, but that has more to do with me not being religious. The
neurotic worries of religious people are always difficult for me to grasp. For
somebody more religiously connected I can imagine this movie will resonate
quite well.
Still, I do
like the idea of cutting this deep, to the bare bones in a story. It gives
movies a focus rather than distractions and Bergman was a master of that exercise.
I do not recall watching a movie as naked as this one, though. The black and
white photography helps a lot, but this is really all about communicating
internal turmoil, which in turn means acting and direction.
This is a
movie I admire more than I enjoyed. I did not connect sufficiently with the
subject matter and it feels unresolved, but I would still recommend it. It is
very much Bergman.
You are really flying through 1963! Haven't seen this one yet so just barely skimmed your review.
ReplyDeleteNo, problem. I will wait till you have seen it.
DeleteIt is going fast right now, but that is coincidental. Actually I am not too happy with 63 so for. The movies are very bleak.
I found this to be a powerful film, and one that expressed something that I had trouble (until recently) actually putting in words.
ReplyDeleteDo yourself a favor--look up Divine Hiddenness. It explains a great deal.
I will look it up, it sounds interesting.
DeleteThis is certainly a movie that requires you to think.