Den store flugt
During the
Christmas holiday I have, by coincidence rather than design, been watching John
Sturges “The Great Escape”, a movie I thought I remembered from ages ago (turned
out I was confusing it with another movie) and had been looking forward to see
again. An adventurous movie in color with quality actors. The right medicine to
overcome the torment that was “Flaming Creatures”.
Going into
a movie with high expectations is problematic and true enough, 10 minutes in I
started to become disappointed. It did not last, though, and by the time it
finished I was happy enough about this movie. I know the bar is not that high
in 63, but I think it would have been a good movie in any year.
“The Great
Escape” is the story about a group of Commonwealth (+ a few American, for the
audience) war prisoners, who are brought to a high security POW camp due to
their history of attempting escape. True to form, they have hardly arrived
before they start planning their next escape. While a few of the them, Hilts
(Steve McQueen) and Ives (Angus Lennie) in particular want to do it on their
own, the majority joins a large-scale effort to free a very large number of prisoners.
This effort
is led by Roger Bartlett (Richard Attenborough), who is considered an escape genius,
and is joined by capacities such as Hendley (James Garner), the master scrounger,
Velinsky (Charles Bronson), a master tunneller, Sedgwick (James Coburn), maker
of all things, and many others including
Blythe (Donald Pleasence), the forger, who actually spent a long time in a POW
camp during the war.
The plan,
which takes up the major part of the movie, consists of digging three tunnels
(Tom, Dick and Harry), under the fence and into the surrounding woods. The
tunnels are however just part of the plan. They also must arrange papers,
cloths, backstories and scout out the terrain around the camp. The whole plan
is close to collapse when one of the tunnels is discovered and when the second
turn out to be 20 feet short it is nearly fatal.
The last
part is the story follows those who do get out and how most of them get rounded
up by the Germans. I suppose that is a spoiler, but since it is a movie that
claims to tell a true story, there are limits to the freedoms it can take and
this is something that can be looked up.
My initial
disappointment came from the very obvious Hollywood makeover this story got.
Everything looks just a tad or two too pretty, glorious and heroic. I know this
was a camp for western officers, the top-rung of prisoners, but having watched
and read so many stories of prison camps in Germany during the war, I have come
to expect a grimy and miserable camp full of starving and worn out prisoners.
This is 1944 and nobody in Germany, except for the top echelon is getting
enough to eat, yet these people look like they are in a summer camp. Their
hunger to escape is not because of any physical want, but a combination of wanting
to get home and to go back to join the fight. At the same time we see none of
the German brutality that was so notorious in the camps.
An hour
into the movie however I had overcome this suspension of disbelief (too many
musicals have trained me in that skill) and I started to enjoy it for the boyish
adventure it is. The tunnel is really amazing and the logistics they set up is
impressive and slowly the characters start to flesh out. There are so many
stars here that there is never enough time with any of them, but this kind of two-dimensional
story does not require that much depth.
The story
also turns outright exciting and tense as the escape draws close and is executed
and the last hour of this very long movie rushed by in a flash.
For a movie
that takes as many freedoms with the true story as this one does, the ending
may come as a surprise. I had in my mind pictured this escape as a great
success with all these heroic characters finding their way back home. When
reality catches up with the fairy tale, it is brutal and laconic. How much
patience would Nazi-Germany have for enemy officers on the run?
I think the
ending saves the movie to a large extent. It gives it more weight and goes a
long way to tone down the fluff. I come out of the movie feeling very
entertained and with a sufficiently somber feeling in the gut. Definitely a
highlight of 63 and recommended.
See what I told you? I said you've got some great movies ahead in 1963, and this is one of the ones I was thinking of.
ReplyDeleteThere's a lot to like in it, not the least of which is the tremendous cast and the boy's-own adventure feel of it. And it's a great reminder that Steve McQueen was too cool for this world.
Yes, this is the sort of movie that helps me throuogh the sixties.
DeleteThe cast is half this movie. Normally I see a large all-star cast as a problem, but here it works fine.
I saw this in the theater as a kid and believed from the word go. It has always been a favorite. I'm looking forward to another rewatch pretty soon.
ReplyDeleteIt is true adventure and it certainly appealed to the little boy within me.
DeleteI think you would still like it and I will look out for your review.