Snylteren
”The Servant”
is a movie I very much want to like, but somehow it does note quite make it.
Tony (James
Fox), a somewhat foppish upper-class bachelor, has just acquired a London townhouse
and hires Hugo Barrett (Dirk Bogarde) as his manservant. They seem to get along
quite nicely. Barrett takes care of Tony’s every need at home and is every bit
the deferential servant. Tony’s girlfriend Susan (Wendy Craig), however, takes
an instant dislike to Barrett. She wants him out of the way and does not see
the need for a servant to take care of everything in the house.
This seems
unnecessarily cruel and while the idea of a manservant may well seem exaggerated
there is no need to take it out on the poor servant. Little do we know at this
time that Susan is more right than even she could guess. See, Barrett has a
cunning plan to make Tony his obedient slave…
Over the
next part Barrett continues to be the attentive servant, while behind the scene
he is plotting the downfall of his master. He hires his sister Vera (Sarah
Miles) as maid in the house. Only, Vera is apparently (perhaps) Barrett’s fiancé
and an instrument in his plan. Vera’s task is to insinuate herself on Tony,
which should not be too hard, Vera is very attractive. The plan succeeds, and
Tony gets so infatuated with Vera that he stops paying attention to Susan.
Eventually
Tony and Susan discover that Vera is in fact not Barrett’s sister and he fires
the both of them. Susan sees how besotted Tony is with Vera and walks out on
him an Tony is all alone. Now that Tony sorely misses Barrett he takes him back,
but now Barrett is on top and Tony is a broken man.
The acting
here is very interesting as is the cinematography. It is a mixture of
ultra-realism and weirded out surrealism. This is in particular the case in the
very intense scenes such as when Tony is captured by Vera or the wandering
camera on the restaurant. The end sequence most of all has the feel of an acid
trip, worthy of Trainspotting.
Yet I cannot
come to terms with this movie. I do not understand the motivation of Hugo
Barrett. Of course he may have a deep hatred for the upper class, but his
transformation from servile waiter to manipulating mastermind seems so
unmotivated. I seriously doubt that Susan’s dislike for him has anything to do
with it. Secondly, what motivates Tony to sink so deep? It is true that Tony
has very little content in his life. Except for some rambling about a project
in the jungle we never see him do actual work. We also never see him in contact
with anybody but Susan. Still he seems too willing to be manipulated and too
weak to separate himself from Barrett. It is this complete lack of self-respect
that I find difficult to understand.
Therefore the
scheming of Barrett and the decent of Tony feel, to me, oddly contrived and
unreal and that is preventing me from entirely buying into the story. I would
love to get just a hint of motivation for either of them, but it is strangely absent.
The closest thing is Barrett’s arrogance towards some incredibly annoying women
at a phone booth and that anger was quite understandable.
Still, I
did enjoy the movie even if I did not quite understand it. It does ensnare the
viewer with its captivating cinematography and interesting camera angles. That
I suppose is good enough.
Sorry this was a near miss for you. You are really speeding through those 1963 films!
ReplyDeleteIn hindsight it was probably better than I gave it credit for. It just bothered me a great deal that I did not understand the motivation.
DeleteOne movie left to go then I am also done with 63.
I like this one quite a bit because of just how dark and twisted it gets. Then again, I seem to like dark and twisted.
ReplyDeleteIt is dark and twisted and I do like those elements. Especially the cinematography. It just feels a bit... weird at times.
Delete