Z
A central
element in most conspiracy theories is that “The Government” is on to something
sinister, keeping it secret for the public and going out of its way to cover up
for itself. Most conspiracy theories are laughable but then there are those
countries where these things are very much reality and sometimes so blatantly that,
at least for an outsider, those in power seem act with impunity.
Apparently,
Greece was such a place in the sixties and the movie “Z” is about some of the
shenanigans of the “deep state” in Greece.
In 1963,
the leader of a left leaning pacifist party in Greese, Grigoris Lambrakis, got
murdered during a rally in Thessaloniki by an extreme right-wing group acting under
the instruction of the army and the police. In the following procedure led by
the investigator Christos Sartzetakis, it was revealed how far this conspiracy
went into the high ranks of power where a conservative elite wanted to cling to
power at all costs. Yet, although exposed, they managed to forgive themselves
and hit back at the prosecutors for embarrassing them.
“Z” is in French
and appears to be taking place in France, but that is a very thin disguise. In
every other aspect it is referring to this case in Greece to the extent that
the opening titles state that any resemblance to real characters and events is
intentional.
Yves
Montand is “The Deputy” (meaning Grigoris Lambrakis) who is visiting “a
northern town” for a rally. His team is having difficulty finding a proper
venue, clearly the proprietors have been “discouraged” by somebody, but finally
they are assigned a lousy locale. The team has been warned that The Deputy may
be targeted but the police is treating it indifferently. At the rally the
police are present in force and so are a number civilian anti-communist protesters
(despite the pacifists are not communists). Already arriving at the venue, The Deputy
is his in the head without the police doing anything and when he leaves the
venue they finish the job, exactly as the real hit.
When the Examining
Magistrate (Jean-Louis Trintignant as the Christos Sartzetakis character)
arrives, the case is presented as an accident where a three-wheeled mini-lorry
swerved into The Deputy, causing him to fall and hurt his head. The second half
of the movie is now the investigation where gradually the official story
proposed by the police and army brass falls apart and their, sometimes clumsy,
attempts at silencing witnesses are exposed. The Magistrate is not political,
he is just doing his job a little too well, but he soon finds himself the target
of the deep state who accuses him of being a communist. Yet he prevails. Sort
of. As a news report shows at the end, the top brass may have been charged, but
they generally went free while the witnesses and indeed all the leading members
of the pacifist party either died in unfortunate accidents or disappeared.
“Z”
presents itself as a political movie, but I think today we would call it a criminal
thriller. What political position condones criminal behavior or blatant suppression
of the population? Oh, I am sorry, my mistake, plenty of political systems believe
this sort of behavior is defensible and convenient, even today. Then let me rephrase
myself: “Z” makes the fighting of a corrupt political system a criminal investigation,
treating the brass as what they really are, criminals. The movie does have sympathy
for the left, but it is not a leftist movie any more than “All the President’s
Men” was. It is simply indignant at what a corrupt regime managed to get away
with.
Technically
it is a well-made movie. It does not go too far in what could easily have
become shrill accusations, but instead when things become grotesque resort to
ridicule. In this way the generals and colonels become involuntarily comical in
their insistence on protecting the realm.
The Book writes
that the suspense is unbearable, but I would not go that far. It is interesting
though, and manages well to keep my interest. Definitely a movie to recommend
but one you should probably be careful watching in a number of countries even today.
This movie blew me away when I saw it several years ago. Looking forward to seeing how it holds up.
ReplyDeleteI don't think you will be disappointed. It is quite intelligent.
DeleteThis is such a great movie, and probably more relevant now than 50 years ago.
ReplyDeleteIt probably is. It is almost as if we are not even outraged anymore and certainly not surprised and that is sad indeed.
DeleteI struggled to connect to the characters. Perhaps I’m too stupid to follow the politics. I had no idea what all these French officials were talking about. At least the music was good, and there were a couple of okay chase scenes. Sounds like you got more out of it than I did.
ReplyDeleteI think it is important to realize that this is not supposed to take place in France but in Greece. Using France is simply a very thin cover. Most of the characters do not even have names so they will easier be related to an actual person in Greece.
DeleteAnyway, if you thought Z was confusing then you should see the next movie I am going to review, The Conformist. It take non-linear storyline to the next level.