Maskernes nat
I am not a
fan of the slasher genre, so while I am aware that Halloween is an entire
franchise with new movies still coming out today, it is something I have never
sought out or watched. That may have been a mistake because, as I have just
found out, the original Halloween from 1978 is a masterpiece.
Six -year-old
Michael Myers stabs his sister to death in cold blood and is locked away for 15
years, until he escapes. His doctor, Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasence) fears he has
gone back to Haddonsfield to kill some more. That is exactly what Michael (Nick
Castle and Tony Moran) has in mind, in as far as anything is going on in that
mind of his.
Near his
old house he spots Laurie (Jamie Lee Curtis) whom he starts to follow. Laurie
meets her two friends Annie (Nancy Loomis) and Lynda (P.J. Soles), which makes
for three targets. It is Halloween evening and Annie and Laurie are both babysitting
in houses just across from each other. Michael, wearing his scary mask, is the
boogeyman become reality, and starts at Annie’s house…
The story
is really not complicated and that is as it should be. This is all about how it
is done.
The setting
is as normal and familiar as can be, small town /suburban, quite roads with
middle class homes. The girls are ordinary teenagers who do what teenagers do,
nothing special there. Into this comes the Boogeyman and on Halloween of all
nights. He is like a shadow, something you see out of the corner of the eye, immobile
and unfaced and gone the next time you look. He is the reflection of your fear,
and you are powerless against it.
We are
observers, very literally. Sometimes from the viewpoint of the boogeyman,
sometimes from the victims and sometimes we are that third entity who is there
but unable to interact, standing on the stairs or behind the bushes, but you
always, at least in the scenes with tension, have the feeling of being THERE.
As the Book
also says, this is very much like Hitchcock. Probably a bit gorier, but the
tension is not in the actual killing but the threatening presence, the looming
danger of something only half-seen. Like the pool scene in Tourneur’s “Cat People”.
It is this element that Carpenter here condenses to excellent effect.
It helps
that it is accompanied by an excellent score, which again is simple but very
effective. To my surprise I learned that the score is also Carpenter’s work. A
talented man.
I believe
this was Jamie Lee Curtis debut film, but she does not come about as an amateur.
On the contrary, she was very convincing and very curious to see this very
young Curtis with longer hair. Then again, she is out of an acting family and
her mother got stabbed pretty badly in “Psycho”, a movie not that different
from “Halloween”.
On
Wikipedia, there is an entire section devoted to an analysis of “Halloween”. I
did not read it, but I do understand the temptation to read some deeper motives
into the movie. This happening on Halloween, the apparent immortality of
Michael, the Boogeyman and the fact that Laurie as sole survivor is a virgin.
This layer seems unnecessary, but maybe it does help tickling our subconscious.
A small,
but amusing, detail: The movie the children are watching is “The Thing”, the
movie Carpenter would go ahead and make a remake of a few years later.
Halloween
is brilliant because it takes a simple idea and perfects it. Very little extra,
just this, the ultimate subliminal tension. Highly recommended.
This is such a great film for so many reasons. You can read a lot into it if you want to, but it's not necessary. The simplicity of the story is what really sells it. It's just--scary bad guy and survival. It's truly masterful filmmaking.
ReplyDeleteExactly. It is the focus and perfection of that single element that makes it a masterpiece.
DeleteI liked Halloween much better than I thought I would. Scary but not very bloody. Bea
ReplyDeleteYes, the focus is in the right place, on the tension of the build up, not on the actual murders. That is why it works for me.
Delete