Off-List: Trading Places
The first Off-List movie of 1983 is
“Trading Places”, a big childhood favourite of mine. I cannot tell how many
times I have watched this over the years and while it may not hold up as well
today as it did back then, it never fails to amuse me. This time I watched it
with my wife and son and based on his reaction to it, this was his first
viewing, it still works.
Randolph (Ralph Bellamy) and Mortimer (Don
Ameche) Duke are wealthy commodity brokers (Duke & Duke). Stingy,
prejudiced and arrogant, they have the kind of money where it does not matter
what people think of them. In between their never ceasing pursuit of making
money, they have an ongoing discussion on heritage vs. environment. Eventually
they decide to conduct an experiment: They will send their star executive into
the gutter, while picking a desperate type from the gutter and make him their
executive. The value of the bet: 1$.
The star executive is Louis Winthorpe III
(Dan Aykroyd), as arrogant and prejudiced as the Dukes and of “good breeding”. The
gutter type is Billy Ray Valentine (Eddie Murphy), presently employed begging
money pretending to be a crippled Vietnam veteran.
Louis takes really badly to having
everything taken away from him. Without his status and his money, he is nothing
and only with the help of the hooker Ophelia (Jamie Lee Curtis) does he stay
afloat, sort of. Billy on the other hand eases into the role of commodity
broker very easily. With the help of the butler, Coleman (Denholm Elliott), he
is soon unrecognizable from the street thug he used to be. This lasts until he
learns the truth about the bet (and that there is no-way the Dukes will have a
black man leading their business). Now Billy, Louis, Ophelia and Coleman are on
the warpath to take down the Dukes.
A modern take on The Prince and the Pauper
tale, this is not a novel story, but in my poor opinion the best rendering of
it ever done. It plays as a comedy, but except for some scenes on a train, it
stays well inside the probable and makes us invested in the story. We are
amazed with Billy, and although it is difficult not to feel a bit schadenfreude
with Louis, we do feel with him as well. He is just so utterly helpless. Maybe
Billy is a little too good a commodity broker for somebody picked up from the
street, but explanation would be that street smarts is transferable into the
commodity market.
The comedy is mostly slightly underplayed,
with hints and asides and of course Murphy doing some of his idiosyncratic
shenanigans. By today’s standard the comedy is way-underplayed, but my claim is
that this is exactly why it works. The afore mentioned train sequence is the
exception. Here we venture deep into silly comedy and according to the extra
material the studio wanted to ditch this part. Thankfully, they did not. Silly
as it is, it is also hilariously funny and comes at exactly the right point of
the movie. Amazingly, after this intermezzo, the movie is able to jump straight
back into probable land to provide us with a very satisfying and believable
finale. That it is not free fantasy is reflected by the fact that today there
is a law against insider trading known as “The Eddie Murphy rule”, based on
“Trading Places”.
John Landis had a good streak at the time and
“Trading Places” is definitely Landis classic. It is a good example of his type
of movies. For Aykroyd, Murphy and Curtis, “Trading Places” was a huge boost to
their careers, it is likely they would not have gone where they did without
this movie and at least for me, this is the movie I associate all three of them
with. I also love how the movie showcases Elliot, whom I mostly know from the Indiana
Jone franchise, Ameche and Bellamy. All three belong to the old guard and they
bring a lot to the movie. Don Ameche had not acted in a feature for a decade,
but went on a roll after this one. I loved his role in Cocoon.
Yet, for all this, the greatest impact of “Trading
Places” is the personal one it had for me. I loved it throughout the eighties
and nineties, and it was one I always could take out if I wanted a good time
and it still is.
Seriously, why was this movie not included
on the List?
My monthly movie group watched this for January. It holds up really well.
ReplyDeleteThat's not the case of a lot of contemporary comedies. Stripes isn't that funny and Revenge of the Nerds is deeply misogynistic, as is Porky's.
It is really sad when comedies I used to love lose their zang. So much happier am I when they still work.
DeleteThe other way is true as well. I have almost given up on modern comedies. If it is less than five years old, chances are it will be stupid and not fun at all. Interestingly, this coincidences with advent of AI. There is a tempting conclusion there.