Amadeus
The first movie of 1984 is “Amadeus”. It was
also the big winner of 1984 with eight Academy Awards, including Best Picture,
Best Director and Best Actor, so 1984 starts on a high.
In 1823, Antonia Salieri (F. Murray
Abraham) is a patient in a hospital. He is visited by a priest to whom he tells
the tale of how he killed Mozart. Yes, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, the great composer.
His story takes us back to Vienna in the 1770’ies.
At this time Salieri is a court composer at
the court of Emperor Joseph II (Jeffrey Jones), a sovereign very much
interested in music but lacking any talent for it. At this time Mozart (Tom
Hulce) arrives in Vienna. He already has a reputation as a prodigy, but he is
also an infantile playboy. In an age of wigs, face powder and effeminate men,
it takes something to stand out as an obscene playboy.
Salieri immediately recognizes the massive
talent of Mozart and is perceptive enough to realize he is himself just an
amateur by comparison. Add to this the ease with which Mozart produces his art
and the libertine silliness of the man, Salieri is struck by deep envy and
anger with God for bestowing such gifts on an undeserving person. Salieri makes
it his life mission to bring Mozart down.
Mozart and Salieri are real, historic
characters, but the story presented here is entirely fiction. Mozart died young
from a mysterious ailment and already in the early nineteenth century, the conspiracy
theory were flourishing that Salieri and Mozart were rivals and that it was Salieri
who killed Mozart. In reality they were more like colleagues, and it was Mozart
who had a thing for conspiracies.
So, if this movie is not about a historic
event, what is it then? My understanding is that this is a tale of envy. Of mediocracy
and conformity trying to stifle the extraordinary and the beautiful. What
better example of talent than the greatest composer ever and the myth of
Salieri’s rivalry with him. Director Milos Forman was Czech and had a history
of subversive movies challenging the communist regimes in Eastern Europe and it
is not a big jump to see Salieri as the communist party supressing the arts in
the East.
As a drama, “Amadeus” works, but at a very
slow pace. Considering Salieri “just” has to bring Mozart down, he is awfully
slow at it, this is a lengthy movie, and it is more about the grief Salieri
suffers at his more or less failed attempts at discrediting and marginalizing
Mozart. Mozart suffers immensely, but he does not make it easy for himself
either. He is a reckless playboy, convinced of his magnificence and spending
far too much for his measly income.
The real assets of “Amadeus” are the music
and the sets. Oh, Lord! Almost every time there is music, it is Mozart. The
volume goes up, it is full orchestra, and it is a Mozart Greatest Hits show. We
hear parts of “The Marriage of Figaro”, “Don Giovani”, “The Magic Flute” and
many of his famous symphonies. I am not very knowledgeable on classical music,
but even a heathen like me gets blown away by this music and the arrangement of
it does it full honour. This is a movie to listen to in a cinema with a good
sound system.
The set is just as magnificent. The
illusion of the eighteenth century is perfect, not just on the costumes and the
wigs, but using Prague as location was a strike of genius. Some of the scenes
were shot in the very theatre where Don Giovanni premiered originally. It has
been far too long since my last visit to Prague, but I do remember that eighteenth
century vibe. I also did bring home a Don Giovanni puppet on my last visit...
What works less well is the choice of using
American English as the spoken language. I know this is not an unusual thing
and even Ridley Scott’s recent “Napoleon” did it, but I kept expecting to hear
German. This gets really bad with Mozart’s wife Constanze Mozart (Elizabeth
Berridge), who otherwise delivers an excellent performance, but her accent is
so thick... According to Wikipedia, Mark Hamill was considered as Mozart. That
could have been fun.
This is not a bad movie at all, even if it
seems to creep along at a slow pace. There is so much to look at and listen to
that I do not mind. My only regret is that I never saw it in a cinema.
This is my favorite Best Picture winner from the 1980s. I know that it's completely inaccurate historically and I genuinely don't care because the movie is so damned good.
ReplyDeleteIt is a good movie, and more than that, it is a unique movie that does not follow a standard template and get away with it.
DeleteStill, to mind, the thing I take with me from the movie is the music and the sets. I cannot think of any movie i can compare that to.