Guld
The movie ”Greed”
has two claims to fame:
a.
It
being the first feature to be entirely shot on location
b.
It’s
insane original running time of nine hours.
While it is
kind of cool to have made a movie of nine hours, it is also incredibly self-destructive
considering that the story can barely carry a two hour running time. The
version I found was supposed to be a recreation of von Stroheim’s (Yes, he is
the guy) own reluctant cut of some four hours. The difference between the studios’s
cut of 140 minutes and von Stroheim’s has been inserted as stills and inter-titles.
Well, if you want to kill a movie experience that is the way to do it. I found
nothing in those stills that justified the longer running time and even without
them it is pretty dragged out.
The fact
that it is shot on location is a nice detail I suppose but does not really
justify its exalted status. Its moral story maybe, though it is mostly a story
of grief and decline and futility.
In many
ways this is a parallel to “La Roue”. The obvious reason being the mammoth
running time. But also in choice of theme. John McTeague is an unfortunate
character, who first beats the odds working himself up from nothing to be a
respected dentist and get the girl of his dreams to then fall into a bottomless
abyss of ruin, drink and more ruin. It does not seem to matter what he does, he
is doomed. A hopelessness that match Sisif of “La Roue” very well. McTeague is
also living a lie. He was never a “real” dentist; he just learned the craft and
figured that was enough. But when that collapses it is just one of the legs
being kicked away from under him.
McTeagues
enemies are, like in La Roue, the ones closest to him. His best friend Marcus
and his wife Trina.
Originally
Marcus was a rival for Trina, but backs off when McTeague falls in love with
her.
But then
Trina wins the lottery!
Trina
becomes a greedy bitch who will rather see her husband fall to pieces than
spend any of her precious fortune (in some eerie scenes you can almost hear her
say “My Precious!”) and Marcus changes his mind and arrange the downfall of
McTeague to get Trina and the money.
From then
on it is just downhill until the final shootout in the desert.
I don’t
really like watching people meet misfortune in movies. Of course I know it is
part of setting up the drama. Things have to go bad for them to get well again.
But here this is a painful and artificially prolonged process that gets deeper
than you imagine possible. You need to have a number of masochistic traits to
enjoy this movie. Trina in particular is a character I came to despise
thoroughly, though I suspect that was intended, but also McTeague show some
less than pleasant sides and in the end I am just hoping that they will all
shoot each other and end the misery, for themselves and for me.
Anything
good then? I waited (looong) for the shootout in the desert and that part was decent.
I just don’t think it was worth waiting for.
I have
mentioned it before: Stroheim as a director is a disaster. Why his movies are
celebrated is beyond me.
I remember feeling very disappointed in this film. It's touted as being so fantastic. Like you said, the desert sequence is good, and while I didn't find the movie *bad,* per se, it certainly didn't blow me away.
ReplyDeleteAnd it's looooooooooooooooooooooooooooong.
The hype was probably one of the reasons for my disapointment. But then I did not really like the story either.
DeletePluses: seeing old San Francisco on film and Trinia's obsession with her money.
ReplyDeleteNegatives: the run time and the run time.
Yup, that is it.
Delete