Krudt, Kugler og Kærlighed
Television
here in Denmark rarely show silents, but when they do it is almost always
slapstick comedy. There is a good reason for it: They are still as funny today
as they were 90 years ago. One reason for that of course is that this sort of
physical comedy is not hampered by lack of dialogue. Another reason is that
they were really good at it back in the twenties. My personal favorite was
always Buster Keaton. He was easier to get than Charles Chaplin and Harold
Lloyd was, well, just not present. Knowing there would be quite a few Buster
Keaton movies on the list I bought box set with six disks (!) and went ahead
watching them all.
That is a
lot of Buster Keaton and I know that some would call it heresy but it is not
all of it brilliant. However the picks for the book are good and I could name a
few others that could easily replace some of the poorer choices in the book.
Yet Buster Keaton is with 5 titles much better represented than Harold Lloyd
(1) or Charles Chaplin (3), so I guess I got as much as I could ask for.
When Buster
Keaton made “Our Hospitality” he had already made movies, especially short
two-reelers. His technique was therefore fully developed and we see it here in
all its glory. Keaton has a very good sense of what looks funny. That is not
just a matter of comical stunts, though he excels at that as well. A good
example is the ridiculous big hat he is wearing or the primitive bike he is
driving with perfect sincerity despite the impracticality of it. The setup is
also comical in itself; diminutive Keaton as Willie McKay walking totally
unwittingly into a family feud with the Canfield clan represented by three big
and trigger-happy men. The odds are so uneven that it screams to heaven. You
can almost see Keaton saying: “eh, ups…”.
It actually
starts well enough for Willie McKay. He has inherited some property in the
south and on the way there he becomes acquainted with a pretty girl. Very well
acquainted indeed. Unfortunately she is Canfield, the mortal enemies of the
McKays (or rather the other way round) and Willie only finds out when he arrive
at their house as a guest. Luckily the Canfields are bound by southern honor to
offer hospitality and NOT kill their guest, hence the title, and so Willie is
safe as long as he stays in the house.
There are
basically two parts to the story; the train ride to the south and Keaton trying
to get out of the house without getting shot when he leaves. That sounds thin
and it probably is, but both settings are so funny and well made that it is
really enough. The train is supposed to be the earliest train in America which
is of course hopelessly primitive and hardly up to the task and thus a source
of much comedy.
Keatons
deadpan style is also perfectly fitting for this story. It is a trademark of
his that is expressed through his face and almost depending on the movie being
a silent. I think that had a lot to do with why he did not survive the change
to sound. Buster Keaton was the silent comedy.
I also enjoy Keaton more than Chaplin or Lloyd for exactly the reason you said - his deadpan face, his stoic acting work much better today than overacting mugging.
ReplyDeleteSame here regarding Keaton, and this one is tremendous. There are those great moments of Keaton dashing out of the house and back in just to mess with the brothers that are still great.
ReplyDeleteThere are four Chaplin films on The List, but only three silents. I wouldn't mind dropping one Keaton (say, Seven Chances) for another Lloyd (like Safety Last!) to even things up. But this one is fun from end to end.
Four Chaplin films? I counted only three: The Gold rush, City lights and Modern Times. Which one did I miss? I have been looking in vain for The Dictator, which ought to have been an obvious choice.
DeleteThe fourth Chaplin is Monsieur Verdoux from 1948.
DeleteI agree that there are some obvious choices from these three masters that AREN'T in the book - The Great Dictator and Safety Last!, like you said, being pretty huge examples of that. I would love to know the rationale for excluding films like that from the list.
You are right, I missed that one.
DeleteAs a child I found Chaplin too dificult. It takes an adult to really appreciate the deeper layers in his movies. Keaton is easier and I still enjoy his movies as an adult. Lloyd was entirely new to me and his films came as a revelation simply for that reason. If I should take a vote today I would call it a close race. I would have loved to add Safety last! to the list but not in exchange of any of Keatons.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this Keaton film quite a bit. The sight gag with the horse had me laughing.
ReplyDeleteI'd also like to mention Harold Lloyd's Safety Last. The one film of his they did include (The Kid Brother) is only okay. Lloyd did much better films than that and Safety Last is the best among them. This may be the biggest puzzler for me in regards to a film not being in the book. In addition to it being very entertaining, it is a classic, AND has one of movie history's iconic images of Lloyd hanging off the face of a clock.
Even though it's not in the book, I do recommend you try to see it sometime, if you have not already. The Freshman is another really good Lloyd movie that is not in the book.
In order to see The Kid Brother I got a 9 volume box set of Harold Lloyd stuff! I think that pretty covers his major and several minor features. I agree that The Kid Brother only ranks average among those. Safety Last! however easily compare with the best of Keaton.
DeleteI have a feeling it is an old, classic discussion Keaston vs. Lloyd. I am not the judge of that, I just point out the imbalance in the list.
I like early Keaton much better than early Chaplin--and like you, I'm not that into Lloyd. What I like about Our Hospitality is how funny it is, and that daring historical bike ride.
ReplyDeleteEarly Keaton is awesome. That bike ride is so ridiculous it could stand alone and still make a fun short.
ReplyDelete