The Palm Beach Story
Preston
Sturges was apparently quite a hit back in the early forties. The List contains
an entire swath of his movies and to me he seems to be a 1940’ies version of
the Farrelly Brothers. He was a crafty comedy director who through craftsmanship
knew how to get something fun out of even mediocre scripts, but like his modern
day equivalent the quality of his production varies and some of his films are
certainly better than others.
“The Palm
Beach Story” is I believe not one of the highlights. It feels somewhat
stretched and forced and not up to say “The Lady Eve” standard.
Many of the
plot elements are taken right out of Leo McCarey’s “The Awful Truth”. A
bantering couple split up, but cannot let go of each other and in the end must
accept that they belong together. There are also the new relations with money
and charm and the couple even have to play brother and sister so the new
relations do not realize that are in fact a couple. I love “The Awful Truth”
and a movie could do worse that borrowing from that one, but while Claudette
Colbert is funny and witty Joel McCrea just is not Cary Grant. In fact McCrea
as the husband Tom Jeffers in altogether too heavy and grumpy for his character
to work. Instead of witty he appear bitter and angry so much that I feel I
understand the real reason why Colbert’s Geraldine Jeffers want to divorce him
and try something new and certainly it does not seem obvious why she would want
to come back to him.
This may
seem trivial but that character flaw almost blew the movie for me. This is a
shame because it does have a lot of things going for it at least potentially.
Geraldine
is an odd character. She appears distraught and confused, at least in the first
half of the film, and yet resourceful which throws her into some odd
situations. She is fed up with just getting by and has realized that she is a trophy
wife with no practical skills so she wants a divorce so she can find some rich
guy to marry. Her explanation that it is actually to help her husband Tom is
really far out and yet that is actually what she accomplishes. I can kind of
understand why he thinks that that is the most absurd idea, but she is so
determined to go through with it that her leaving is more like a prison break
escape. A comedic highlight of the film. I loved that she tried to fasten her
goodbye note to him with a needle to his body.
Half way
through the film however she seems to be losing momentum. When her husband
shows up at the Hackensacker yacht she becomes more drama and less comedy and in
fact the comedic focus instead is transferred to Princess Centimillia (Mary
Astor).
Another
very amusing element is The Ale and Quail Club. They have absolutely nothing to
do with the storyline, but were quite hilarious on their own. A bunch of
hunting enthusiasts who act like a gang of boys when they get something to
drink resulting in, well, chaos. At first they offer to bring Geraldine on
board the train without a ticket and later in the midst of chaos she escapes
their company.
The
Hackensackers are another potentially funny element. John D. Hackensacker( Rudy
Vallée) is a nerdy billionaire, a dope ripe for picking and his sister Princess
Centimillia is a frivolous idle rich complete with a history of failed or insincere
marriages and a foreign admirer in tow (greetings!). Those are two outrageous
characters and that is also their problem. They are just too much. I do not
really buy their characters. The princess takes too easy to Tom and John D. too
easily falls for the damsel in distress. Such two characters did not become
billionaires by being idiots.
The resolution
is a story on its own. When the Jeffers decide that they should stay together
after all instead of a life in luxury the Hackensackers do not seem too upset
that their new loves turn out to be frauds. Instead they happily jump their
twins, whom they have never met.
In fact the
resolution ties up to the beginning where we see a wedding involving tied up
bride and fainting maids. I understood absolutely nothing of that and only
while doing research on the film (no more Rosebud incidents!) did I understand
that it was in fact their twins who should have been married, but Tom and Geraldine
both stole their twins place and so ended up getting married, but not to the
one they wanted to marry. That should explain why a few years later Geraldine
want to flee the marriage, but not to my mind why their twins would then be
ready to marry the Hackensackers.
All in all a
film with many potentially fun and interesting elements, but also a lot in the
execution that just do not work so well. Rapid dialogue and fast pace tries to
make up for it, but there are just too many holes in the logic. Still some
solid laughs and that is after all the purpose of a comedy.
Yeah, this one bothered me a lot. The ending ranks as one of the stupidest I've ever encountered.
ReplyDeleteSeems to me Preston Sturges had a problem with ending. So far, even in his better movies, the resolution comes out of nowhere.
DeleteThe whole "we have to get divorced" thing was built on such a flimsy plotline that from that point on I just treated this film as an amusing piece of fluff, not a "serious" comedy. I didn't have a problem with the ending, or at least no more problem than I did earlier similarly silly plot points.
ReplyDeleteThat is a way to look at it and also the way I usually consider comedies. However there is a certain internal logic that must be intact. It is a contract with the audience. Preston Sturges have a tendency to break that contract and compromise the internal logic and that annoys me, even in a comedy.
Delete