Detour
”Detour” is
proof that you can make a see worthy and interesting film on a miniscule budget
if you focus on story, dialogue and style. On the face of it “Detour” is very
simple. There are no fast chases, no gun fights, a minimum of sets and all of
those obscure and the actors are reduced to a handful, none of them very
glamorous. Instead there are monologues, dialogues and lots and lots of driving
in front of rear projections.
This is a
grimy story about a broke piano player, Al (Tom Neal) trying to get from New York
to L.A. to be reunited with his girlfriend, Sue (Claudia Drake), a hopeful
actress trying out Hollywood. His journey gets seriously sidetracked though a
number of incredible coincidences of the kind no police would accept. Instead
things just gets worse and worse for Al until we find him washed up at a dinner
in the opening of the film, because like most film noir this story is told in
flashback.
“Detour”
hardly brings anything new to the table. In 1945 the noir format was already
well established and the ingredients had already been introduced through movies
like “The Maltese Falcon”, Double Indemnity” and a ton of other like-minded
films. What “Detour” does is giving the whole thing a notch extra. This is
lower, grimier and more desperate than its contemporaries and the cheap
production quality actually supports this expression.
Like all
film noir “Detour” has its femme fatale. Except this is no ice queen or
alluring, yet dangerous, blonde. Nope, Vera (Ann Savage) is as badass and
bitchy as they come. A horrible horrible woman. Base and cunning and cruel to
boot, Vera is a true lowlife and thus a good representative for this film.
Al is
hitchhiking and gets picked by a jovial Charles Haskell (Edmund MacDonald), who
seems like an okay guy. He buys him meals and tries to befriend him and
everything is just dandy until Charles dies sleeping in the passenger seat
while Al is taking a turn at the wheel. Though it may be that he dies when Al
opens the door and Charles falls out, I am not sure. This is not entirely clear
in the film. In any case Al is not to blame but now he is stuck at the side of
the road with a stiff and a car. Al is probably not entirely wrong when he
assumes that the police will have some difficulty buying the real story, so he
shuffles the body behind a bush and assumes Charles identity until he can get
to Los Angeles and lose the car.
Soon after
Al picks up what appears to be a pretty, lonely hitchhiker. Boy, was that a
mistake! This is no other than Vera, the she-devil incarnate, and what is
worse, she knows Charles Haskell and that Al is not him. She assumes Al has
killed and robbed Charles and now she uses that to put a leash on him. He better
do what she tell him to do or she will turn him in.
For a while
it is not really clear what she intends to do except to get to L.A., but being
with her is punishment enough for Al. She is awful. Ann Savage shows some skill
at presenting such a base character. She even tries to be alluring and
manipulate Al in that way, but at least he is not falling for that. No matter,
she quickly returns to what works: shouting and threatening him.
That is a
major part of the film, watching first Al and Charles driving around and then
Al and Vera driving, sitting in the sofa in a rented apartment, playing card
and drinking solid in said apartment and driving some more. All the way
talking, shouting, ranting, pleading. And all through with a running commentary
through the narration of Al at the diner.
Things come
to a head when Vera finds out that Charles Haskell stands to inherit a large
sum of money and she gets the idea that Al should show up and claim that money
now that he is Charles. The resulting debacle ends in another incredible
accident, even more insane than the first one and Al now finds himself a double
murderer.
The message
“Detour” wants us to read is that Al, an ordinary, innocent and even talented
guy gets ruined through these coincidences. He has no intention of violence,
yet people die around him and he is snared into a world where he does not
belong and do not want to be. So when we find him at the diner we are looking
at a broken, finished man just waiting to be picked up by the police.
Here is the
problem though. Charles dies from an accident and Vera had it coming. Besides,
her demise was an unforeseen accident as well and actually left him free of
that disaster on two legs. Apparently the police even thought it was Charles,
not Al, who had killed her, so essentially Al was free. A terrible experience
richer, but free. He should be relieved, not broken, and hurry up to find his
girlfriend, not bumming it at the diner. Therefore the ending seems a bit
forced to me. The guy needs a shower, a bed and a shrink and then he should be
okay. Instead he is just waiting for the inevitable retribution from the law.
Except for
that last bit I liked “Detour”. It is seedy and grimy and poor of technical
quality, but it is has great entertainment value. It is clear how many later
movies were inspired by this one. I bet Tarantino has seen and loved it.
Ah, there are no happy endings in film noir ... I love the narration in this one. "Fate, or some mysterious force, can put the finger on you or me for no good reason at all."
ReplyDeleteThe narration as well as the dialogue are the strong sides of this film.
DeleteI had a different take on the presentation of this film and it is the reason I liked this quite a bit. What if the narrator is not being honest with us? What if he's practicing the story he's going to tell everyone?
ReplyDeleteStop to think about it - what are the odds that two such unlikely deaths would occur like that, let alone occur near the same person? And notice how horrible the woman is presented, almost as a parody of evil. Perhaps it is so that people hearing the story will sympathize with him. Notice it's her and not him that wants to claim the money. The list of things goes on and on.
That was my interpretation. People were used to the narrator telling us "what really happened", but I think this might be the first noir film where what we are seeing from the narrator may not be the real truth. (It's also one of the things I really liked about The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.)
that is a really interesting interpretation of the story. I had not thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. That would also help expain the ending with a patrol car picking him up. Thanks Chip.
ReplyDeleteI'll buck the trend here. I didn't love Detour. The massive bad luck coincidences were a strike against it. The fact that if our main character did a single thing differently (and more intelligently) we'd have no film is what killed it. Some solid noir dialogue, but nothing to write home about otherwise.
ReplyDeleteTrue, I agree. It seems almost forced the way he is detined for disaster, but if you apply Chip's interpretation it actually makes perfect sense. Then it is not as much stupid choices, but Al's attempt at cooking up an improbable story to explain his transgressions.
DeleteGreat observation about the simplicity of the film. I enjoyed it for the noir, especially the voiceover, but yes, the ending did feel forced. Parts of it reminded me of Patricia Highsmith's The Talented Mr Ripley, and I had hoped for a similar ending.
ReplyDeleteThank you. It is some ago that I saw Detour and I miss this sort of grimy noir. By the mid-fifties the style is much more polished and the rawness is often gone.
ReplyDelete