Mrs. Miniver
With ”Mrs.
Miniver” I have finally caught up. This is the last of the new additions up to
the point where I am on this chronological journey through 1001 movies I
apparently have to see before I die. Some additions were good and some were
less good. “Mrs. Miniver” is a big hmmmm.
In a sense
I am being a bit unfair to this film. I am just coming off the excellent “Brief
Encounter”, a realistic and honest film about some ordinary British people
experiencing something extraordinary. “Mrs. Miniver” is also about some
supposedly ordinary British people going through something extraordinary, but
with an entirely different result. In almost every way “Mrs. Miniver” is the
opposite of “Brief Encounter” and that is not really a good thing.
Of course
it is all about context. “Mrs. Miniver” is essentially a propaganda film made
in the US in 1942 for the American public. Its aim was to show how likable the
British were and how heroically they were fighting the war and that was the
right film at the right time as evidenced by the pile of Oscar statuettes
coming its way at the 1943 awards.
If you want
somebody to be likable you have to portrait them in your own image and that is
exactly what “Mrs. Miniver” does. This is essentially an American story about
an American family living a life and fighting a war that would be recognizable
to the American public. Ah, there is a sprinkling of British elements, but they
are of the stereotypical sort, the kind of postcard British that the locals
would merely scuff at. In fact I doubt a Britton in 1942 would find much he
recognized in this film. The result is a Disneyland version of England that
screams phony.
At the
outset of the film everybody are so happy and live their beautiful perfect
lives, so careless that you almost smirk at the thought that war is almost upon
them. The Minivers are supposedly a middle class family in a Kentish village,
but that must be some architect salary! Their palace of a house, their maid and
cook and the idle wife fits more into the classical American family ideal, a
Stepford Wife’ish ideal rather British country life. Their problems are limited
to conspicuous consumption and a son who has got some leftish ideals while at
Oxford. The later seems played more for fun than drama. It is understood that
his ideas are rather ridiculous and may just serve to tell the innocent
American viewer that, oh, in England they have nobility and they still have
some silly privileges. Harmless ones though, but fun too, you know, real
nobility!
Even the
dialogue is borderline annoying and my recent brief encounter just aggravates that
impression. The only relief in that entire first half is Dame May Whitty as the
old Lady Beldon who is able to stuff enough English vitriol into that old hag
to make her interesting.
The second
half is better. As reality of war hits like a hammer the impact is so much
bigger because it hits this Garden of Eden. There is drama in the bomb shelter
and the ride home during an air raid and that saves some of the film. This part
gets sufficiently tense and coupled with a surprise ending I did manage to get
moved. That is of course engineered and the design is almost overdone. The
pathos is thick as mud and played for every cent. The annoying thing here is
that although events are starting to get “interesting” the characters remain
essentially the same. There is little in the sense of character development. In
“Gone With The Wind” Scarlett is forced to evolve in the face of adversity but
the Minivers are still their happy careless selves. They are just a bit sad
somebody close died and that the Jerries ruined their house. Everybody are so
damned busy being heroic that they forget being human.
It was as I
said the right film at the right time. A few years later it would not have been
even close to an Oscar. William Wyler, the famous director of this film, won
the award for Best Director for “Mrs. Miniver”. He would later go on to win it
again for “The Best Years of Our Lives”. The differences between these two
films are glaring. “The Best Years of Our Lives” is still a great film today,
but who remembers “Mrs. Miniver”?
This was a
movie that did little for me. It was not on the original list and I did not
miss it, but I suppose 6 Academy Awards requires some sort of recognition. So,
seen it, check, on to the next one.
As it happens, I watched Mrs. Miniver during a time when I was reading a book about Americans in London during the blitz. For that reason, I found it really interesting. It's also really inaccurate--lives were so much worse in reality than they are depicted here.
ReplyDeleteIf you look at this as a piece of propaganda, as a way to motivate the U.S. into entering the war, it does a hell of a job. I like it and I think it's an essential, but I can see disagreeing with that.
Well, as propaganda it is effective and very well made, no doubt about that. It just does not hold up very well when out of this context. At least not for me. As propaganda films go there are a number of films on the list from this period that holds up far better. "Fires were Started" is my favorite in that category.
DeleteI also liked this more than you did, and because I saw it at a particular time. It is definitely propaganda, but I feel it applies to any war, not just WWII, so in that sense I see it as still relevant. And fair or not, as a Best Picture winner it is probably known by more non-movie people than Brief Encounter.
ReplyDeleteWell, certainly it figures in all the lists and statistics. That is a sort of immortality. I realize opinions are divided on this one and my problem might also be one of context. From my perspective having just experienced what the film media can do in terms of making a film relevant for me, Mrs. Miniver fall far off the mark.
DeleteI must admit that I was too busy crying to notice some of the flaws you found. Maybe it's a Greer Garson thing ...
ReplyDeleteWell, I am starting to realize I am in minority on this film, so it may just be me. And I also cried in the end.
Delete