Berygtet
It was with
some anticipation that I went into ”Notorious”. Hitchcock is, well, Hitchcock
and as far as I can tell “Notorious” has a bit of a reputation. Besides the
acclaim, a movie that features Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman and Claude Rains
cannot help being subject to hype.
High
expectations are disadvantageous. This is not a bad movie, not at all, but I am
not entirely thrilled by it either.
T.R. Devlin
(Cary Grant) is an agent of sorts for the US government sent out to recruit the
estranged daughter, Alicia Hüberman (Ingrid Bergman), of a Nazi traitor for a
delicate job. Apparently the Hübermans is a German immigrant family in the
States who belonged to a subversive circle of German who in exile had decided
to follow Die Vaterland. I suppose most countries at war, cold or hot, are
obsessing about a fifth column enemy working from within. For a brief time
during and after the war those ghosts were Nazis. Later they were Commies.
In any case
Miss Hüberman loves her new country and has no sympathy for her father, but she
is intimately familiar with this circle of Nazis so Devlin’s agency can use her
as a mole.
Ingrid
Bergman is excellent as the careless, even nihilistic, party girl and it
actually took me a little while to recognize her. I never saw Bergman this
rowdy and flamboyant before and that was a revelation. Unfortunately she
deflates as she is recruited and the entire film seems a deroute for her. As
she and Devlin goes to Rio for the job she tries to replace her passion for
party with passion for Devlin, but Grant is strangely wooden. While I certainly
had no problem recognizing him, his profile is unmistakable, he seemed only a
shadow of himself. He is supposed to be a gentleman agent, a proto James Bond,
but he is sparse and dry in his charm, possibly to act up to the professional agent,
but it looks more like restraint than toughness. Almost as if he has been ordered
to tone Cary Grant way down. Hüberman seems to have agreed to the job out of
love for Devlin, but Devlin grows more and more distant and her passion dims as
well.
Along on
this mission is Captain Paul Prescott (Louis Calhern) a jolly optimist who is
in charge of the mission but looks more like he is on vacation in Brazil and
certainly seems ignorant to what is going on between Hüberman and Devlin. His
instructions are that Hüberman has to ingratiate herself on a certain Alexander
Sebastian (Claude Rains) who is a local nazi-in-exile notoriety. These Nazis
are up to something and if Hüberman can get a foot inside maybe they can find
out what it is.
It works.
Sebastian is flattered by Hüberman’s interest in him and immediately lets her
in. He even proposes to her despite advice from his evil mother and Hüberman
accepts.
Here is the
strange thing and the heart of my troubles with this film. Devlin is just about
the most unprofessional secret agent I ever knew. He gets emotionally involved
with Hüberman. Well, you can say that it helps recruiting her, but once in
Brazil his emotions keep interfering. Although he himself brought her in and in
a very literal sense pushed her into the arms of Sebastian he gets jealous.
Come on! It’s a job and YOU set it up! Instead of protecting her and supporting
her most dangerous position he wanders off to sulk and seems genuinely more
interested in whether Hüberman loves Sebastian. He is jealous on the mark, for
Heaven’s sake!
For
Hüberman it is a disaster. She is very literally in the lion’s den and not by
her own design. The Nazi’s are almost faceless, menacing entities dressed up in
suits and good manners and in their company you feel that violence and sudden
death can break out without warning. Her lifeline is Devlin and he abandons her
because she is doing her job.
This sort
of unprofessional behavior annoys me, but I realize it is a general weakness in
Hitchcock’s films. He may be using it as a device to create tension or simply
thought that the romantic angle is a must. In “Shadow of a Doubt” it was kept
at a level where it had minimum impact on the central plot and tension
building, but because Hüberman’s precarious situation to some extent is a
result of this childish behavior it bothers me a great deal.
Of course
Devlin overcomes this spell of idiocy and shows up at the right times to do his
job, he is after all the hero of the film, but it is Claude Rain’s Sebastian
who ends up stealing the picture. Sebastian is a grandfatherly character who
seems almost the unwilling bad guy. He is caught between his position in his
social circle, his dominating mother and the terror of the Nazi group. How much
he is really involved in their cause is always unclear. The group meets at his
place and stores their secret doomsday weapon in his basement, but he seems
like a guy who would rather just be married to a young and pretty girl. When he
finally turns on Hüberman it seems to be motivated by the emotional betrayal
more than cruelty as such and in the end self-preservation seems to win over
the cause. Claude Rains is a far more human villain than we are used to and in
light of Devilin’s inexplicable childishness Sebastian almost looks like the
better catch.
Despite
this Rains never gets out of character. Sebastian may be complex, but he is the
enemy and when he and his mother set out to destroy Hüberman they are scary.
Claude Rains is definitely an actor I have come to respect.
“Notorious”
of course has plenty of classic Hitchcock suspense. The champagne running out
as a countdown to disaster, the claustrophobic Sebastian mansion, the hidden
enemy. All this is what we love from Hitchcock. He also likes to scare the shit
out of pretty blondes and Hüberman is getting her dose. As she gets more and
more frantic I recognize Bergman from her other roles. This is something she
does well and often, maybe too often. Somehow I liked her rowdy badass attitude
in the beginning of the film better, but hey, if you are looking for a girl who
can look troubled Ingrid Bergman is the girl you want.
“Notorious”
is entertaining and full of suspense, but it is not Hitchcock’s finest. So far
that title belongs to the outstanding “Shadow of a doubt”. This is also not
Cary Grant’s finest hour. But then again, both of them made so many excellent
films that I can forgive them this one. “Notorious” belongs to Ingrid Bergman
and Claude Rains.
We'll, we differ on this one. If forced to choose my favorite Hitchcock film at gunpoint, this would be the one. I've seen it many times and I still get nervous during the scenes at the party.
ReplyDeleteIt is rare that I am 100% positive or 100% negative about a movie. Most movies are somewhere in between, so the fact that I have troubles with some elements does not mean that I do not like the film. It is in many ways an excellent film and technically it may even be a masterpiece. It is also very suspenseful, and that scene at the party in particular.
DeleteI just have problems when the story turns illogical or improbable and for me the attitude of Devlin is just that. It breaks the illusion from the film when characters who should know better do things which are counterintuitive or outright stupid. I do not buy that he is so overcome with love for Hüberman that he throws away his brain. Not in his position or with the importance of his job in mind. Not to mention the danger he is placing her in. I also do not buy that he gets some sort of kick out of torturing her like that. I do grant that I may be placing too much emphasis on the spy story and too little on the romance. That may be, but in that case they are playing a very reckless game there. That setting is not suited for power games.
Had Devlin been more sensible and responsible I think I would have liked this film a lot more. Oh, he can be an asshole for all I care, but here it seemed more like a plothole.