Sansernes Rus
After ”La
Strada” I continue with an Italian film ”Senso”, but that is also almost the
only thing these two film have in common. I know the director Luchino Visconti
only from the surprisingly good and convincing “Ossessione” from 1943 and I
suppose I expected something in the vein of Italian neorealism, a style “Ossessione”
was a precursor for. “Senso” however is in many ways a very different experience.
And then again maybe not.
Let me
start with the positives.
This is a
divinely beautiful film. Italy in Technicolor is a gorgeous place and this
movie uses locations to great effect. I have become so used to the bleak scenery
of neorealism that I had almost forgotten how beautiful a place Italy is.
Instead poor people in the slums we are watching the elite in the most romantic
surroundings imaginable and the crazy thing is that it is not even a fake
über-romantic studio set, but actual real life Venice, an Italian opera, a real
manor in the countryside and the old town of Verona we see. This is what
reality also looks like and it takes your breath away. Honestly everybody owe themselves
one time their life to take their loved one to Venice. Touristed as it may be
there is no more romantic place in the world. Trust me on that, I have been to
a Leonard Cohen concert on Piazza San Marco with my wife and strolled arm in
arm on deserted paths along the canals at night. You just cannot beat that.
Add to that
period settings in gorgeous colors, uniforms, dresses, paintings, flowers, you
name it, and this is truly a feast for the eyes. Ah, and the glazing on the
cake, the gorgeous Alida Valli as leading lady Countess Livia Serpieri. I know
her from “The Third Man”, but that movie did not do her justice. Technicolor
loves her and as was mentioned in the extra material, she was the sweetheart of
every Italian man in that era. I can believe that. Oh, my…
Second
thing I notice right from the beginning is that this is a movie where the characters
speak the language they are supposed to speak. Italians speak Italian and
Austrians speak German and I even sense a hint of Austrian inflection. This
pleases me greatly and it immediately gives the movie 100 points in its favor
right off the bat. Okay, Farley Granger is an American and it may feel odd to
give him an Italian and German voice, but he is playing an Austrian officer in
Italy and that is what matters. I wish a lot more producers would have the
courage to be that consequent in such matters.
As you can
already tell this movie has a lot going for it, but then we get to the plot.
Frankly,
half way through the movie I was ready to denounce the movie for its plot and
acting style. This was melodrama of the worst kind and no fancy wrapping could
save it. But the movie takes a most spectacular turn with the last act and
whether intended or not goes in a direction that seems to criticize the very
elements I was having problems with.
The year is
1866. Countess Serpieri (Valli) is involved with the independence and
unification movement in Venice that eventually led to the unified Italy under
Garibaldi. Her cousin Roberto Ussoni is arrested during a happening at the
opera in Venice and Serpieri is trying to prevent a duel between Ussoni and the
Austrian officer (Granger as Lieutenant Mahler) he insulted. Serpieri is
married to an old count, who disagrees with her political involvement, and I
guess for the hot blooded Countess he is a bit of a bore. Certainly it takes no
time for the Countess to fall in love with Lieutenant Mahler. Soon they have a fully-fledged
affair going with a secret apartment at their disposal in Venice.
As war
comes closer Serpieri leaves town and is entrusted with a gold treasure
intended to finance the campaign against the Austrians, but when Mahler shows
up at their manor she is so anxious to keep him out of harm’s way that she lets
him talk her into giving him the gold treasure so he can bribe a doctor to
declare him unfit for military service.
Up to this
point the Countess is behaving and acting as belonging in a Max Ophuls period
piece. She is so much in love, the officer is soooo handsome in his white
uniform and she totally loses her head. One thing is that she is cheating on
her husband and boring and old as he may be that is just the price of money and
security. She does have an obligation there that she is letting down. Then again
I suppose some flirting on the side made life bearable in those stuffy
marriages. What is a lot worse is that she is throwing away her moral
integrity, not by loving an enemy soldier, when it has to be I actually admire
that, but by spending the money so many people depend on, on her love interest.
It shows how much she is a victim of her emotions, but it also reveals her as a
failure as a person and at this point I could not care less for her.
Then we get
the twist and I better cry SPOILER ALERT! The whole thing backfires on Livia
Serpieri when it turns out that Mahler is a spineless womanizer who sucked her
dry of money and in terms of moral and human integrity is absolutely worthless.
This is what Serpieri has thrown away everything for. We get the best scenes of
the entire movie when she seeks him out in Verona and find him in decadent
luxury with a young (much younger than the Countess) girl and only mockery for
Serpieri. This is total humiliation and degradation. I cannot help but seeing
this as the price she pays for her betrayal. Not of some religious penalty for
debauchery, but for losing her senses and throwing her head and all integrity away.
It is cheap, I know, but somehow I feel vindicated. Too many movies celebrate
this “follow your dream and to hell with consequences” ideal, but here is a
movie that lets the world come crashing down on a person who does exactly that.
A handsome officer in a dashing uniform may generate romantic dreams, but is
this reality?
This
actually points directly back to “Ossesione”, which, when you think about it,
tells exactly the same story.
The
melodrama gets very thick, the acting is heavy handed in the silent tradition,
but though it annoyed me at the time I see it now merely as tools to tell the
story, a story of people who loses everything as victims of their emotions.
I liked
this movie better than I expected and even if you do not care for the story see
it for the pictures. It is a beautiful beautiful movie to look at. Or even
better, visit Italy. I will be going there in less than a month.
I haven't seen this one yet. Your review makes me look forward to it. I generally love Visconti. For another gorgeous film of his, you have The Leopard coming up.
ReplyDeleteI think there is a lot to look forward to here. I just hope I have not ruined it for you with my spoiler.
Delete