Mondo Cane
Ahh, 1962.
A new year, new movies, a great leap into modernity or more of the same?
“Mondo Cane”,
the first movie of 1962 is a great leap all right, but I am not entirely sure
where to. Off the planet maybe and into the world of tabloid headlines and half-baked
truths. Certainly an… interesting way to start a new year.
“Mondo Cane’s”
raison d’etre is to shock and upset and not much more than that. In this manner,
it has more in common with a modern tabloid or maybe a Michael Moore movie than
anything else. Sometimes it works, I was upset a few times, and sometimes this
21st century viewer is just to jaded to take offence and then it
seems merely quaint, but back in its day this was a great hit at the box office
and apparently sparked a whole genre of “Mondo” films.
It was an
Italian team (Cavara, Prosperi and Jacopetti) who combined footage from around
the world in a montage that barely hangs together. The vignettes cover items
such as pets, men as sex objects, environmental pollution and religious practices
plus a ton of other issues that generally has very little to do with each
other. When it works best the footage is combined so a topic is considered from
very different angles that makes us question what is normal. My favorite is the
jump from a pet cemetery in America where people say goodbye to their beloved
pets as if they were members of the family to a Malaysian restaurant where you
can get your favorite puppy for dinner. What is normal, to treat an animal as
family or to eat it?
Unfortunately
these juxtapositions fail more often than not, aiming more for the shock effect
as when Gurka soldiers in Nepal decapitate living cattle. Even I had to look
away. Or old people shoved aside to die in Singapore.
“Mondo Cane”
is very liberal in its definition of truth and at times its manipulation is
definitely in the way. I am sure the Bikini atoll was devastated by the nuclear
bomb testing, but somehow the turtle confusion sounds like they are
bullshitting us and the life guard demonstration in Sydney Australia is just
too silly. On the other hand the sequence about nightlife in Hamburg is
probably authentic. I have seen places and people like that and the saying is
true that says that there is nothing as stupid as drunk people when you are not
drunk yourself. Maybe with the exception of the idiots in the bull-run
sequences from Portugal. Or the people who will pay a fortune for a smashed car
or a painting made by nude women smeared in blue paint…
It is a
surprisingly easy movie to get through. The confusion of these vignettes should
have made it pointless, but in themselves they are usually beautifully shot and
with enough surprise that I sit curiously waiting for the next vignette. Tribes
on pacific island or Papua New Guinea are expected to be odd, but it is when we
see our own culture portrayed as odd that it starts getting interesting.
I would not
say I was sold by “Mondo Cane”, its objective is simply too narrow, and I do
not feel informed at all, merely weirded out, but it was still a lot better
than I thought it would be. I would be hesitant about taking too much away from
the movie except this, that when your angle of view changes, things you thought
where normal may suddenly become very strange indeed.
It's been decades since I have seen this. Don't know why it made the Book but am interested in giving it another go. I love my exploitation films, especially if they are really cheesy.
ReplyDeleteI'm getting ready to start 1962 and it looks like a really good year.
Well, if cheesy is what you are looking for then look no further. This is very cheesy.
Delete1962 looks to be very interesting, but I am surprised at some of the movies that did not make the this. I may expand my selection with a few additions.
I'm not a fan. It just seems like point at things that are different and saying, "Lookit how weeeeeeeeeeird they are! They aren't normal like us!"
ReplyDeleteIt's lowest common denominator stuff.
Yes, the scope is very narrow, even if they cover a lot of ground. They just want to weird us out and that is not enough to make it interesting.
Delete