De rodløse
In my old
hometown of Aalborg in Denmark there is a perpetual party. I fair weather it
will be outside on the square in front of the train station while in poor weather
it moves inside into one of the bars on the square, but it will always be on.
When I lived there we called it Grønlænderfesten, which translates to The
Greenlandic Party, since majority of the participants would the Greenlanders
who had moved to Denmark. They were always happy and they did not bother
anyone, but it was difficult not to think that in their alcoholic haze they
lived a shadow life of what they should have been.
“The Exiles”
seems to be the American equivalent. This is about American Indians, or
whatever it is politically correct to call them, who has left the reservation
and now live a shadow life in Los Angeles on the fringe of society. They may be
partying hard, but it does not seem like a happy life, not for any of them and
there is constantly a feeling that this is wrong, that they should be doing
something else.
How real
this movie is I am unable to tell, but it feels like a portrait of the lives of
real people, who narrate over filmed events of one evening and night in their
lives. It might be called a documentary, but it is not a film that offers any
explanations or opinions other than the characters themselves. As a mirror on
reality it would be a good double feature with “Chronicle d’un été”, here succeeding
where “Chronicle…” according to itself failed.
We follow
Yvonne and Homer who live together in the Bunker Hill neighborhood in Los
Angeles. They both left the reservation to strike out for themselves in Los
Angeles, where they met each other. Yvonne is a sad, soft spoken character who does
all she can to make Homer appreciate her. She cooks for him, fix his cloth and
let him do whatever he wants in the hope that he will be a good husband and
father to the child she is expecting and maybe even get a job. In return Homer
is just being an asshole.
Homer does
not do anything but watch television at day and hang out with his friends at
night. They hit the bars, pick up girls, gamble their money away, drink some
more and get into fights. In that process Homer does not offer Yvonne a single
thought, but seems to be perfectly okay about what he is doing as if it is his
right. But Homer is not happy, even though he has a ton of excuses for what he
does. We rarely see him smile and there is a quiet desperation about him, which
becomes most expressed when he going to a midnight pow-wow with the other
Indians on a hill on the outskirts of town.
Both Yvonne
and Homer seems to be wasting their lives waiting for something else, something
they can only vaguely define and which they seem completely unable to reach
for.
I did not
like Yvonne and Homer very much, they were too much fool and asshole to be
likeable, but it was remarkable how honest they were and how exposed they got
in the course of this movie. This cannot have been an easy movie for them to
watch afterwards and I wonder how the director got so close to them. Part of me
thinks he was abusing that confidence by the not very flattering way they are
portrayed, but another part is quite convinced that they we nod and agree that
this is pretty much what their lives are about. These are not resourceful
people. Yvonne is not strong enough to leave or stand up to Homer and Homer is
not strong enough to look himself in the eye and take responsibility for his
life. Instead they just flow with it.
It is fascinating
and not a little sad, a bit like the Greenlandic party in Aalborg. These are
just two people and their friends, but something here speaks for a larger group
of people with similar background. And then of course we get a good look at the
not so glamorous life in Los Angeles in the late fifties, far away for
Hollywood’s glitz.
This was
the last 1961 movie for me. Next comes 1962…
I'm through with Book movies for 1961 as well. I have eight movies left from my own list.
ReplyDeleteIf you are inclined to branch out a bit for 1962, I would like to recommend Harakiri (and Sanjuro but I think you are planning on that one). Harakiri is disturbingly powerful but absolutely beautiful and thought-provoking.
Agree with you on The Exiles. I felt so sorry for those people. Fortunately for them, they seemed to lack the introspection to fully grasp the utter futility of their lifestyles.
DeleteI have not heard of Harakiri, but I will look it up and, yes, Sanjuro is in pipeline for 62 :)
DeleteYou are right, they did not seem to grasp the futility of their lifestyle and I do not know if that is a blessing or a curse for them. If they had understand but as is apparent lacked the strength to do anything about it, it should drive them mad.
I wasn't a fan. I'm pretty convinced that the only reason this made The List is because it was essentially missing for 50 years and discovered in 2008. If this had been released in 1961, I don't know if anyone would know or care about it today.
ReplyDeleteThat may well be. Sometimes obscurity is an asset. It is not a movie I would go back to, but in terms of catching reality they did a much better job than the French in Chronicle d'un été.
Delete