Manden der skød Liberty Valance
It has been
a while since my last post. The past two weeks I have been having my “summer”
vacation with my family, going to both Denmark and Thailand. I cannot say I
really missed watching movies, sitting there by the pool in Hua Hin, but now I
am back (and actually already left for my annual business trip to Beijing) I
cannot wait to get going again.
Today’s
movie is “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance”, a John Ford movie with an all-star
cast. Unsurprisingly this is a western and although I am not a big fan of the genre
I was looking forward to this particular movie, largely due to the cast. We get
John Wayne, Jimmy Stewart, Lee Marvin, Vera Miles and in a secondary role, Lee
van Cleef. This just cannot go wrong.
Yet I was
somewhat underwhelmed by this movie.
In a genre
that indulges in its clichés and stereotypes this movie goes two or three steps
too far in that direction. Let me start with the cast itself:
John Wayne
is simply being John Wayne. I Know, I know, John Wayne is rarely actually
acting (“The Searchers” being a notable exception), but here is he is being the
cliché of John Wayne. He stands, talks, moves and has the opinions and
sentiments of how we think of John Wayne. Why John Ford called the character
Tom Doniphon and not just John Wayne is beyond me. Jimmy Stewart as Ranse
Stoddard, a newly arrived lawyer from the East, is also essentially being Jimmy
Stewart. His character is a combine of the most archetypical Jimmy Stewart
characters to the extent that I see Jimmy Stewart and not Ranse Stoddard there,
on the screen.
The story
is that of the taming of the west. The (no-named) area around the town of
Shinbone has already been possessed by ranchers and is now going through the
next phase, the transition from open range cattle farming to that of the
homesteaders. Liberty Valance (Lee Marvin) is a local gunslinger, who
represents the jungle law of the ranchers while the newly arrived lawyer Ransom
Stoddard represents the “civilized” rule of the law. In between these is the
character of Tom Doniphon. He is the tough, self-relying and confident rancher
type, but he is also friendly to the new homesteader group, not least because
he has his eyes set on Hallie (Vera Miles), the daughter of two Swedish
settlers. Tom believes in the power of the gun and seems to be a better match
against Liberty Valance (at least in his own head) than the bookish Ranse who
appears hopelessly unsuited for the jungle law. Yet the core of the movie is
Ranse versus Liberty, anarchy versus law, territory versus statehood, ranchers
versus homesteaders.
It sounds
like a story we have heard before, a few times actually, and with the
characters outlined, hopelessly cliché. But placing Tom Doniphon there in the
middle, something different happens and this is where “The Man Who Shot Liberty
Valance” is best. In the black and white struggle Tom is something as unusual
in a western as grey. Tom is the loss of the wild west, the remembered freedom
and the sacrifice for progress. John Ford said that although this is a fight
between Stewart and Marvin, John Wayne is in fact the central character. I am
not sure this is enough to lift the movie into being something special, but it
helps.
I have a
feeling a movie like “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” is better loved in
America than outside. It seems to tap into a lot of cultural references that
are uniquely American. In this sense it feels a bit like “Mr. Smith goes to
Washington”. Personally I never got the idea that you are only a man when you
can stand up to your enemy with a gun.
Still as
westerns go it is probably not too bad. Time flies well, there is a good pacing
and plenty of action. If this makes you tick I suppose you could do worse.
Glad to see you back! I feel somewhat as you do about the movie. Actually, the most memorable part to me is the song and it's not even in the movie! It tells the story of Rance Stoddard in the verses but the refrain is "the man who shot Liberty Valance, he was the bravest of them all".
ReplyDeleteI think I read something about a song, but I did not notice anything special in the movie. I will read your review.
DeleteI rather like this one. Perhaps you need to be brought up in the genre to not just understand but truly feel what this is trying to do with the idea of legend and reality.
ReplyDeleteThat may well be. I did get the idea of the legend being more important than the facts. The O.K. Corral shoot-out is a good example. I suppose the western genre is digging into a dream of a golden age lost and that is what this is about, the myth making that forms a cultural basis, or something like that.
DeleteMy problem is mostly that this is the n'th time this theme has been proccessed and it has long ago gone into cliché-land.