Subarnarekha
Yet again
we are back in India. Given how big and influential Indian movies are today I
suppose it is only reasonable that they get some space on the list. Every time
however, I am reminded that I am not Indian and that Indian culture is
distinctly different from western culture. I sense I am missing entire aspects
of these movies and I get confused a lot.
“Subarnarekha”
is no different in that respect. It is interesting enough and well made, but I
am not in a position to actually understand it nor the themes it refers to and
so my review of it will be awkward.
Iswar (Abhi
Bhattacharya) is a Hindu refugee in 1947, escaping from Bangladesh during the
partition of India. He brings with him a girl, Sita (Indrani Chakrabarty, Madhabi
Mukherjee) who is either his sister or daughter. This is fairly important, I
think, but I honestly cannot tell. Age-wise she must be his daughter, but they
call each other brother and sister. In the refugee camp he picks up a lonely
boy, Abhiram (Sriman Tarun, Satindra Bhattacharya) and take him in. Abhiram is
also addressed as brother. Iswar gets a job from a rich friend as second in
command of a factory.
Years later
Iswar is now wealthy and the children have grown up and fallen in love with
each other. This is a problem. Especially when it turns out that Abhiram is
actually low-caste. Iswar’s boss is a religious man and it is important to him
that Iswar does not associate with low-caste. So, Sita must be married off to
someone else, which does not turn out so well. In the middle of the ceremony
she and Abhiram run away together.
Fast
forward another few years and Iswar is going crazy and Sita and Abhiram are
poor together in the city with a small child. It is not really getting better
from this point.
It is a
grim tale, but also a bit strange. A lot hinges on what the actual status of
the children are. Are they now legally brother and sister, then of course they
cannot marry, and their eloping seems rather reckless. Biologically of course they
are not brother and sister, so what is the big deal for Iswar? And this thing
with low-caste, how weird and stupid is that? Iswar is giving him an education
and has raised him. He is not some simple boy from the gutter.
Iswar’s
life is getting massively ruined because of all this and that is both
understandable, both his children (?) are gone, and somewhat excessive. The
climax of the movie, which I will not reveal here, is of course intensely
traumatic, but Iswar was already dissolving up to that point.
In
traditional Indian style much of the movie takes place on dismal locations and
is peppered with songs. These are very… Indian. Normally not my cup of tea, but
I must admit they were haunting and added exactly the right ambience to the
movie. The dismal locations, well, it is India. Dismal locations is the
standard.
This movie
is very much in line with the other Indian movies on the list so far. Bleak and
political and quite far from the style normally associated with Bollywood.
These were likely the ones that made an impact outside India. In India Subarnarekha
apparently tanked. The audience did not care much for its misery.
In the
final analysis I was okay with this one. It is really okay, but just difficult
for me to fully understand. It seems unnecessarily dismal, but hey, this is
India.
This is one of those films where I feel like if I understood the culture more, I'd appreciate the movie more.
ReplyDeleteExactly, my point indeed. The caste issue is so weird that I am sure I lost a significant part of it.
Delete