The Battle of Algiers
”The Battle
of Algiers” is an Italian/Algerian movie about the uprising that ultimately led
to the independency of Algeria from France. It is a movie shot in a newsreel
style attempting to be a documentary, to give the impression of reality
although everything is staged years after events actually too place.
Let me say
right from the start that I do have some problems with this movie.
While “The
Battle of Algiers” pretends to be objective and depict reality it is after all
an ordered job by the Algerians. According to comments the Italian contractors
rejected the blatantly one-sided view the Algerians initially wanted and
insisted on a more neutral point of view, but “more” is probably they right
word. When you watch this movie there can be no doubt that the movie intends to
favor the rebels although it avoids outright demonization of the French. So, we
as viewers are supposed to take side with the Algerian rebels.
Well, that
is a normal premise for propaganda movies, so I guess we have to live with that.
The real
problem is that those heroic rebels are simple terrorists. Random murder, bombings,
stabbing, ramming with cars, all those are acts we are terribly familiar with
today and I think most will agree that such acts cannot be accepted no matter
the cause. Maybe I am particularly sensitive to the subject by having been frequently
to Israel over the past 18 years including during the second intifada. I know
how it feels to be part of a public that can be subjected to random bombings
and stabbings and the rage the French-minded public in Algiers feels is very
much understandable to me.
The motives
of the Algerian FLN may be noble and they make some fine speeches, even if they
do not altogether make sense, but through their choice of means they delegitimize
themselves completely. Despicable though it was, the tactic was clever and
ultimately successful. The terror attacks generated a huge amount of anger and outrage,
which meant that the gloves came off. At the same time it very much created an “us
and them” situation between “Europeans” and “Africans”, which threw the regular
Algerians into the arms of the FLN, whether they were so inclined or not. Not
dissimilar from the situation in Gaza. Because of that it actually did not
matter if the FLN survived or not, they had already won the population and thus
the war.
The French
are through the movie criticized for being cruel and ham-fisted and it
certainly does not look good what they are doing. In hindsight there was a lot
they could and should have done differently, most of all in the battle of
hearts and minds. The colonial disregard for native culture was definitely part
and parcel to their ultimate failure. Still, in hindsight, did the Algerians
actually win by kicking out the French or would they actually have been in a
better place today had they found a peaceful accommodation? I think they would,
but in the Middle East people tends to shoot themselves in the foot.
The
interesting thing about the movie is that the Italian’s insistence on making it
as real as possible inadvertently shows the Algerians in a less favorable light
and makes us understand the French. Despite itself it actually undermines the
very premise of the movie. One could argue that this is a redeeming feature of
the movie, that it proves its neutrality, but I am not certain it is intentional.
A good
example is the portrait of Colonel Mathieu, a character who is not real, but a
composite of a number of actual characters. He is a hard nail, a ruthless
commander who wants to win at all costs, but then the movie also decides to
present him in a far more favorable light, one that respects his enemy, command
from the front rather than from behind and who asks very essential questions
about the motivation for the fight. Hardly a one-dimensional villain.
I cannot hide
that I had a lot of sympathy for the French in this movie and very little for
the FLN. It must have been very frustrating to live in Algiers at the time and
hindsight did not help them much. There is a part of me who despise the movie
for its sympathies, a part of me who want to kick the French administration for
messing it up and a part of me who am impressed with how real this movie looks
and therefore despite having to celebrate the FLN actually ends up condemning
it. I think it is worth watching, but it is not a pleasant watch.
Very interesting perspective you have on this. Alas, according to the IMDb date I’ll have to postpone my own rewatch to 1966.
ReplyDeleteI look forward to read what you think of this movie. I think it could be very polarizing.
ReplyDeleteEnjoy you vacation on the river boat. It looks absolutely awesome.
It's not a pleasant movie, but it is a great one, I think. It's also an important one--one of the more important political films of its day. Despite how hard it is to get through, it's one that bears repeat viewings and a lot of study.
ReplyDeleteI suppose you are right.
DeleteThe thing that made the chain fall off for me was the intended endorsement of a terror organisation. That colored my opinion negatively.