The Godfather II
The big
winner at the Academy awards in 1974 was “The Godfather Part II”. It was the first
sequel to win Best Picture and is, as I understand it, by many ranked even
higher than the first Godfather movie.
It is a
great movie, I am just not certain I would swing myself that high.
“The
Godfather Part II” continues where “The Godfather” left off. Michael Corleone
(Al Pacino) is in full control of the family and all its activities. It is big
business and big money and despite his promises to his wife, Kay (Diane Keaton)
it is still mostly on the wrong side of the law. As in the first movie, this
one starts with a big family party, eating, dancing, family and friends while
inside presides Michael, giving audience to applicants. There is no doubt Vito’s
role is now Michael’s.
Something
in the line of a big business venture is in progress involving a competitor or
business partner, Hyman Roth (Lee Strasberg). The game in underhanded and
involves treason and violence and soon Michael sees enemies everywhere. He
finds himself very much alone, up there on his throne.
Intermixed
we follow the story of the young Vito (Robert De Niro), how his family was
killed by the mafia in Sicily and how he came to America and eked out a living.
Eventually, Vito gets involved with the underworld and it turns out he has a
real talent. Soon he is the king of the Italian community in New York.
“The
Godfather Part II” is an interesting film that tries to dig into the nature of the
mafia phenomenon. It is examining how it works, what makes people do what they
do and the price they pay morally and as well as physically. It is fascination and
abhorrence at the same time. Respect and disgust. The problem is just that as a
driver of a movie, especially a very long one as this is, it is not enough.
Where Part I had an evolving plot that kept the movie interesting, Part II is
more about disintegration than actual plot and it makes the story feel long. I
never worked out the details of the plot with Hyman Roth, which is frustrating,
but also not really important. Michael probably did not work it out either, he
just lashed out left and right, wielding his significant power.
The mixing
in of the Vito story did a lot to lift the movie and I found it potentially more
accessible, but just as it was getting interesting, it is left floating. When
Vito has become a mafioso, he is home, and the story is left there.
On the
technical side this is a true dazzle movie. The new year party in Cuba, the Little
Italy setting, and the court hearings are such time capsules, full of
interesting details. There are so many great acting performances here by such a
stellar cast like Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, Robert Duvall, Robert De Niro and so
many more. This is a big movie by any standard and maybe that was what dazzled
the Academy.
Gangster movies
was never really my thing and I do not share that fascination with thugs, so
this is a bit uphill for me. Having now watched “The Godfather Part II” I am
convinced “Chinatown” was robbed. That was the best movie back in 1974.
I do give
my recommendation for “The Godfather Part II”, although I may be the last person
above 40 to have watched it. It is a big and important and very impressive
movie. It just did not keep me that engaged.
My brother-in-law (my sister's husband, not my wife's brother) loves this movie. He is still absolutely aghast when I tell him that while I think it's a great movie, I literally never feel like I want to watch it.
ReplyDeleteI can imagine that. This is a movie with a very high standing and it is a good movie, but not one I would feel like watching again any time soon. I have relatives to who have watched this many times over.
Delete