Hemmelig mission
Paul Verhoeven
and Rutger Hauer is back and this time in a very different movie from “Turkish
Fruit”. “Soldier of Orange” (“Soldaat van Oranje”) is a war epic, the kind of
movie that celebrates heroic and patriotic feats, where men are real mean and women
pretty and… not so much more. Really far away from “Turkish Fruit”. Yet, it
would not be a Verhoeven movie if it did not have a subversive element or two.
In 1938 a
group of young men are starting university in Leiden. They become friends and
we see them together in a number of settings, including a photo session. Each
of these young men will have a different fate during the war. Erik (Rutger
Hauer) is the one we follow the most. He is not, like Robby (Eddy Habbema),
drifting towards the resistance, nor is he like Alex (Derek de Lint) joining
the Germans. Circumstances, such as when Jan (Huib Rooymans) gets in trouble
for being a Jew, forces him to commit and soon he is wanted by the Gestapo. Erik
and Guus (Jeroen Krabbé) are spirited away to England, where they meet the
Dutch Queen and are soon engaged on a secret mission to smuggle out some high-profile
leaders for Queen Wilhelmina’s exile government. A mission that does not
exactly go according to plan.
Erik
Lanshof was a real character, and the movie is based on his own story. Tying a
story to real events has the distinct advantage, especially when filmmakers are
true to the story, that the plot does not follow a standard storyline. There
are twists and turns here that a classic Hollywood screenwriter would not have
liked, and few of the characters are as black and white as the almost
cartoonish format will have us think. This is also the Verhoeven trick, to lead
us into a cliché world of exaggerated color and characters that are easy to
classify (think “Starship Troopers” and “Robocop”) and then undermine it by
throwing in some gray or just some ugly reality.
The young
men think they are invincible. A little war will just be fun. Teasing the
Germans is just next level of pranking and suddenly it is deadly serious and
death is really ugly. Guus, the overconfident womanizer, gets a very bad wake
up call and his demise is like the ugliest of all. What is a hero really out
there in the real world? How many terrible mistakes by the heroes do we not
hear about?
Speaking of
Guus, I had this strong feeling that I knew his face from the moment we see
Jeroen Krabbé in the first scenes, and then it struck me, its Dr. Nichols from “The
Fugitive”! It is such a distinct face.
“Soldier of
Orange” is a big production, the biggest in The Netherlands at the time, and it
shows. There are no half measures on the production value and it feels impressive
as a grand film and maybe that is its problem. At least until halfway in. It
feels like flag-waving, as The Netherlands wants to celebrate its heroes. Maybe
they needed that as a counterpoint to the Anna Frank story which is the one
most people know. But when I caught the Verhoeven undercurrent, when
imperfections and gray zones sneak in, when humans become small, then I started
to appreciate the movie. It is random circumstance that set people up as friend
or foe, as hero or coward. Even the worst traitor is fighting for something. Even
the biggest hero fails. That is total Verhoeven and that is, I believe, why
this movie is on the List.
I certainly liked it better than “Turkish
Fruit”.
I liked this one pretty well. It reminded me a lot of the movies I grew up with, so even though I had never seen it before, it felt nostalgic to me.
ReplyDeleteComplete agreement on Turkish Fruit.
I can relate to that. In my early youth i would swallow these movies raw, completely uncritical to the flag waving. It takes a little more to impress me today but Verhoeven delivers on that account as well.
Delete