Eraserhead
“Eraserhead”
is the first David Lynch movie on the List, but certainly not the last. Lynch
is a legend. Some love his movies, others hate them, but it is impossible to
not have an opinion on them. Even when I am completely weirded out by his
movies, there is something compelling about them that sucks me in.
“Eraserhead”
is a good example of his most surreal movies. Even his most mainstream movies
have surreal elements certainly, but few are as thoroughly surreal as “Eraserhead”.
To describe it in an objective sense is almost pointless. There is a guy called
Henry (Jack Nance) with very tall hair, who lives in a lousy apartment in a
noisy, industrial neighborhood. Some of the scenes are dreams of his, others
may not be dreams, but are certainly as weird as dreams, while others again
seem to be Henry externalizing his impression of events around him, sort of his
interpretation of what is going on. He is visiting his girlfriend at her parent’s
house for a very strange dinner and learns that his girlfriend has given birth
to a baby. Henry and his girlfriend, Mary (Charlotte Stewart), now live
together in his apartment, taking care of the bay, only, the baby is a freakishly
misshapen creature that is constantly crying. Eventually Mary gives up and
leaves and Henry is left to care for the sick monster on his own.
Interspersed
within this frame are the even weirder dream scenarios, which include a stage
with a singing girl with puffy cheeks, a sexual encounter with the girl next
door and Henry’s head falling off to be taken by a boy to a factory and made
into pencils.
All this is
presented in a gloomy black and white cinematography with dark industrial
sounds and very little dialogue.
As soon as
we are talking surrealist and certainly when it is Lynch, we know that
everything we see is a metaphor for something else and that very little of it
should be read for its face value. The task for the viewer is then to try to
work out the metaphors. I cannot say I am good at that, but I have also
resisted the temptation to read up on all the, most likely, very clever
analyses out there. It feels good to build my own impression of what I saw.
To me, what
we see is Henry’s emotional impression of his surroundings. His life is confined
and claustrophobic, hence his small and shabby apartment. He is nervous around
other people and projects his anxieties onto his family in law, the awkward
interview externalized. The baby is an intruding little monster challenging him,
hence it is depicted as a such. Maybe when he loses his head, he is eaten up by
an uncaring world into something useless. Inside, he is himself a helpless
freak of a child and the girl in the radiator is, well, salvation? An angel?
Freeing him from being himself?
Maybe I am
completely off, but the oppressive gloominess is undeniable. The nightmare that
has closed Henry in, is shared with us and I feel as claustrophobic as he does,
watching it.
Many of the
images are Lynch classics. The girl on the stage element is also used in “Twin
Peaks” and “Mulholland Drive” and to some extent in “Blue Velvet”. The man
pulling the levers that control the world. The dark-haired seductress
challenging the lead character.
“Eraserhead”
feels like a mental state, an image on a feeling and as such there is meaning
in everything and over time, I will likely uncover more details and get some
understanding, yet the most important understanding is the unconscious one I
experience simply by watching it.
“Eraserhead”
is deeply unpleasant and wildly fascinating, difficult to love but impossible
to let go of. And definitely not for a Sunday afternoon with the children.
Yes, I have
grown to like David Lynch movies, even when I feel deeply disturbed by them.
I feared this movie. It's not one I would choose to watch again any time soon, but it was a lot more than I thought it would be. There really isn't anything else quite like it.
ReplyDeleteNothing like it at all. Some of Lynch later movies dip into the same waters by never as completely as here.
Delete