Jimmie Blacksmith
The
seventies seem to have been the heyday of Australian cinema. The list editors certainly
were inclined to include a lot of movies from down under. I am not really
surprised, they usually distinguish themselves with their high quality and
production value. For anybody interested in Australian cinema in general I can recommend
the ACMI in Melbourne, which I reviewed some years ago.
“The Chant
of Jimmie Blacksmith” is the latest Ausie movie on the List (for me) and my the
first 1978 movie. It is a movie of exceptionally high production value that
takes on one of the harder subjects around, racism.
We follow a
young fellow called Jimmie Blacksmith (Tom E. Lewis). He is half Aboriginal,
half white and has been taken in by a missionary family to “take the black out
of him”. This is around the year 1900, Australia is all about the Federation
plans, but the real issue here is racism. The Aboriginals are at this time
herded together in shantytowns and ragged camps with rampant alcoholism and
prostitution. Jimmie is torn between his Aborignal family and culture and the
European culture he is being schooled in. When it is time to leave the missionary
home, he aims to make a life for himself as an upright citizen.
This is a
very difficult target. Jimmie finds it hard to find work, and the employers he
eventually finds, abuse and cheat him on the simple basis that he is a “Black”.
The racism is truly rampant, and it is everywhere the same.
Eventually
it is too much for Jimmie. His current employers, the Newby’s, refuse to pay
him what he is owed (a small fortune) on the basis of him hosting some of his (black)
family and they want his (white) wife, Gilda (Angela Punch McGregor) to leave
Jimmie to find employment elsewhere. Something clicks in the head of Jimmie and
he attacks and kills the women of the Newby household and then goes on a
rampage among those people who have abused him.
The movie
is based on a novel, which in turn is based on a real character. How much of
the original events eventually made it into the movie I have no way of telling,
but it is obvious that this is a (traditional) story about an outlaw in the
vein of Billy the Kid and Ned Kelly, with the angle of explaining the villainy
with rampant racism. In this way racism is the source of the problem and the
murders simply the inevitable result of it. This angle of making a notorious
criminal a justified freedom fighter was typical of the seventies revisionist
stream and may feel a bit ham-fisted today.
I read the
main story here as about the rampant racism, the systemic, the mental and the
direct racism aimed at Aboriginal people and culture, and this is the earliest
movie I have watched that goes this far. We even have a schoolteacher who puts
it into words, listing all the evils done to the Aboriginal people and culture
by Europeans, including killing 270.000 of them. A staggering number!
I do
applaud the topic and the wish to bring it to attention and I have no doubt
that the scenes of racism seen here are true enough. My objection to the movie
is a mere general one, something that has little to do with this topic. We get
to see a lot of Jimmie Blacksmith and from what we learn he is smart, he has
pride and he is resourceful and he is not that prone to rash and emotional
actions. Then how is he suddenly turned into a blood thirsty maniac, killing
women and children at large? I fully understand he is being provoked and I also
understand that it is building up over a long time, but it is both very sudden
and very extreme and does not fit his character at all. I would have expected
something smarter, something more just and effective, not this.
The
explanation is unfortunately right in front of us. There is a real story about
a half-blood mass murderer and racism is then appropriated to explain the
murderer. Sort of a backward argumentation, turning an outright criminal into a
justified revenging angel.
Sadly, I am
struggling buying this angle. It is too forced, and that is a shame because the
topic is too important to be trivialized.
Despite
being one of the biggest productions at the time, the movie did remarkably
poorly in Australia. I guess the Aussies at the time were not ready for this
view on their past yet.
I give it a
mixed recommendation but thumbs up from here on highlighting the source problem.
On an
entirely different note, I watched “The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent”
last night on a plane and I strongly recommend it. That is by far funniest
movie I have watched in many years. Maybe I should review it…
I think the question that needs to be asked here is whether or not Jimmie is a product of his environment. If he is, how much can he be truly blamed for his actions, even if he is ultimately resposible for what he does?
ReplyDeleteThat is exactly the point the movie is raising. Their argument is obviously that the racism is causing him to lash out and on an intellectual level it makes sense. The problem is the mismatch between the character we are presented with and extreme violence of the reaction. The argument would then be that even extreme reactions is not the fault of the perpetrator but something he was provoked into and ultimately innocent of. Unfortunately I do not buy this argument when taken to this extreme and that makes the movie feel artificial. The argument works better on A Clockwork Orange.
Delete