Diva
I watched “Diva”
yesterday and have since spent quite a few hours trying to work out this movie.
The narrative is complicated, but at the same time ridiculously simple and I
understand most of it well. What baffles me is how all those threads and
components actually mesh into a coherent movie. The short answer is that they
do not, which may actually be the point.
The central
character of this movie is Jules (Frédéric Andréi). He is a young postman who
lives in a workshop of sorts. Here he has built a temple for opera music with
all sorts of technical equipment, especially for the soprano Cynthia Hawkins
(Wilhemenia Fernandez) with whom he is completely infatuated. One night at the
opera he clandestinely records her performance (and steals her dress). This is
significant in two ways: Hawkins has never allowed any recordings to be made of
her, making Jules’ recording the only one in existence and, secondly, sitting
right behind Jules, two Taiwanese music pirates notice the recording and now they
want it.
A second
storyline concerns a gangster ring dealing in trafficking and drugs. One of the
prostitutes has a recording incriminating the ringleader and she is killed just
after dumping her tape into Jules’ postbag. The twist here is that the boss of
the policemen investigating the gangster ring and the ringleader is the same
person. Not really a spoiler, we learn that early on.
Jules is
now hunted by three parties: The Taiwanese for the opera tape, the police for
being a witness to the murder of the prostitute and two gangsters, known as “The
West Indian” and “The Priest” (Gérard Darmon and Dominique Pinon), for the incriminating
tape. Fortunately, Jules receives help from a very odd couple, the wealthy and
eccentric Serge Gorodish (Richard Bohringer) and his girlfriend, Alba (Thuy An
Luu).
Frankly,
this is a mishmash. There is the odd love story between Jules and Cynthia, the
weird but terribly clever Gorodish and the three chase groups. There seems to
be a social critique of corrupt authorities, a praise of pure art and a big nod
towards film noir. As a crime thriller it is almost a joke as the big reveal
comes very early (the identity of the kingpin) and the chases are almost
comical or at least stylized with Gorodish outsmarting everybody James Bond
style. The point, I suppose, is to not be so focused on the narrative, but the
appearance of the movie.
This is
indeed what this movie is famous for and the alleged reason for including it on
the List. It has been celebrated as the movie that started the “Cinéma du look”
genre, which is supposed to emphasize style to content. This I understand means
to look terribly cool without too much concern for what is actually going on.
If that is indeed so, it would explain a lot in the movie. It is both a visual
and audio feast. Everything looks and sounds spectacular. The workshop Jules
lives in, the apartment (and the lighthouse) of Gorodish, the chase scenes and
so on. Both the Taiwanese in their sunglasses and the gangsters look awesome. I
bet Travolta and Jackson in “Pulp Fiction” were referencing Pinon and Darmon.
On the audio side, we get to hear a lot of opera and in a good way (opera can
be unpleasant, but not here) and when it is not opera, the music is either
sorrowful and pretty or high-speed cliché action movie tracks. Everything for
the senses is loaded high.
As a viewer,
this is a bit challenging. You want to go for the narrative and there is enough
narrative that you do follow it. It is not obscure as Godard would have done
it, but then you are thrown off by the odd set of pieces it consists of. It
seems to me that the way to watch it is to step back and enjoy the elements
rather than the narrative. Tarantino made this his trademark, but a decade before
“Reservoir Dogs”, this style was already practiced in France. In that light, “Diva”
gains a lot more value and meaning. It almost begs a repeat viewing, wearing
those glasses.
“Diva” has allegedly
become a cult classic, and I can see why. At first, I was ready to dismiss it,
but the more I consider it, the better I like it, so I guess that makes it a
recommendation from me.
We'll disagree on this one. I hated this for all of the pretentiousness that it contained. It felt like fake cool to me, like someone trying too hard to be one of the cool kids and failing badly.
ReplyDeleteI actually agree with you that the narrative is close, if not in fact, ridiculous, but my guess is that we are supposed to ignore that and instead look at all the exaggerated form. It is pretentious but also quite playful and that is fun.
Delete