Det gruesomme udefra
John
Carpenter’s “The Thing” is one of those movies that have always flown under the
radar for me. That is, until I watched a documentary series by James Cameron a
few years ago on science fiction movies that made a lot out of this movie. It looked
like a total miss that I never watched it and, knowing it would come up on the
List, I braced myself with patience.
Now, I have
finally watched it and I can see why a lot of people like it, it has a lot
going for it. The reason I am not jumping up and down is that “Alien” was there
already three years before and did it better.
The peace
on an American research station in Antarctica is disturbed when a dog on the
run from some crazy Norwegians seek shelter at the base. The staff find the
Norwegians a lot more disturbing than the dog, so they kill the Norwegians and
take in the dog. Bad choice. The dog turns out to be a shapeshifting monster from
outer space (the “Thing”), which kills and then imitate its victim. It is
impossible to tell who is human and who is a space monster and consequently
paranoia runs amok.
The helicopter
pilot MacReady (Kurt Russell) takes charge and even device a method to
recognize who are humans, but as more and more die, it becomes clear that no
one will get out of this alive and, more importantly, the alien must be kept
away from human civilization.
Bleak
stuff.
“The Thing”
is essentially a “Ten little Indians” story. One by one the staff is taken out
and the focus of the movie is partly on the paranoia everybody gets caught up
in and partly the gory attacks of the monster. And it is really a focus to the
extent that there is little else to the movie. Most of the characters are
rather flat, there is room for no other topic, but who is next? On the upside,
those two elements are done brilliantly.
The monster
itself is alien, awful, gory and cunning and the special effects displaying all
this are nothing less than amazing. This is a tour de force on what was
possible before CGI and even the most outrageous of the displays look real and
believable and for that reason so much scarier. I am neither a big expert nor a
fan of horror movies, but my amateurish guess is that this is up there among
the best when it comes to the monster.
Paranoia
always works best in an enclosed space with a limited number of people and here
we get both. It is quite amazing that it is possible to fill so much of the
movie’s running time with people circling each other with ever increasing
madness, but there you are, and it is quite successful as that.
The problem,
as I wrote above, is that “Alien” did much the same in 1979 and both Nostromo
and the Xenomorph were cooler than the Antarctic research station and the
Thing. There is a strong element of “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” here as
well, but again, it becomes a reboot of something that was itself hugely successful.
Combining those two stories may be inspired and my guess is that this will be
enough for many viewers, particularly when done with this intensity. My problem
is just that I keep thinking about the movie I would rather watch, missing that
dark, quiet, sneaky threat. That sense that if you turn around, it is right
behind you.
Ultimately,
this makes “The Thing” good, but not great for me. I understand why it is liked,
if not loved, but I cannot give it that last appraisal. Something about it is
just too thin.
I get that, but for me, it's a formative film. I would not be the movie fan I am without it. It's one of those saw-it-at-the-right-time films for me, and these days, I watch it every Halloween.
ReplyDeleteI can follow that 100%. When I soon get to Blade Runner I will be in a similar position. I do not dislike The Thing, I just did not have the experience you had.
Delete