The Evil Dead
“The Evil
Dead” franchise is one of the most iconic horror franchises in existence. Even
I am familiar with it and horror is not really my jam. At campus we would watch
the movies a lot, though mostly the second and third installment while the
first one generally went under the radar. Certainly, watching it now, I realize
I have only ever watched extracts from it. We tended to prefer the third Evil
Dead movie because of its slapstick elements and while that is certainly an
element in the first movie as well, it is less of a thing. What is very visible
is that “The Evil Dead” was made on a marginal budget compared to the later
movies.
Five young
people are vacationing in a cabin deep in a forest in rural Tennessee. It is
clear, to us at least, that something is wrong right from the beginning. There
is a strange entity swooshing through the forest, represented by a point-of-view
camera sailing through the forest with an ominous low frequency rumble. The youngsters
are happily ignorant though, but that is soon going to end. In the basement
they find a strange looking book and a tape recorder, telling them that the
book is an ancient Sumerian book-of-death and that a certain incantation will
bring on evil demons. Somehow the tape actually makes the incantations.
Cheryl (Ellen
Sandweiss) is the first victim. When she goes into forest to find out what is
calling her, she is captured by the trees in what might best be described as a
bizarre rape scene. Desperate now to leave, she and Ash (Bruce Campbell) find
out the bridge is trashed. They are trapped. Cheryl now becomes possessed and
changes her appearance for the worse, so they trap her in the basement. The
other girls, Shelly (Theresa Tilly), the girlfriend of Scott (Richard
DeManincor), and Linda (Betsy Baker), girlfriend of Ash, fall in rapid
succession, while Scott in an attempt to get out gets so badly mangled by the forest
that soon he too becomes possessed. Eventually, Ash is alone, trying to fight
off his former friends who just refuse to die and stay dead.
In this
sense, “The Evil Dead” is similar to the sequels. Ultimately, this is Bruce
Campbell as Ash fighting off a horde of zombies and demons in a wild and gory
ride. The setting owes a lot to “Night of the Living Dead” (1968), with an
isolated house under siege by zombies, and the possessed truly look and act
like those zombies, though without the sluggishness. The difference is that the
possessed are already in the cabin and it is a single guy trying to hold them
off while being attacked from all sides. So, it is still an under-siege movie, the
siege is just personal rather than the place.
Of course,
in this genre it is all about the jump scares and the goriness. On the first
account, “The Evil Dead” does very well, but I am also a very easy target. The
second is not as convincing. It is clear that it really wants this to be a
point and the demon possessed do look freaky. Some of the violence is also gory
to the point of the nauseous, but there is a point where the play-doh animation
takes over when it loses all credibility and just look amateurish. My guess is
that it was this more than anything that encouraged a sequel with actual
funding. “The Thing” was a good example of what was technically possible at the
time. Combine that with the talent and enthusiasm of Sam Raimi’s team and this
would be awesome (and so it was!).
Despite the
flaws in production value, “The Evil Dead” works very well and it founded not just
a very successful franchise, but also a horde of movies heavily inspired by it.
The haunted cabin in the woods is now a movie trope and Peter Jackson started
out making movies made to resemble “The Evil Dead” long before “Lords of the
Rings”. I only felt a little disappointed that Ash would not wield his famous
chainsaw, but that of course is only in the sequel.
“The Evil
Dead” is extremely famous and rightfully so. As a movie to watch I do prefer
the sequel, but then again, I have a history there. You get really far on enthusiasm,
but sometimes a bit of funding does the trick. Still, this is a recommendation
from me.
Believe it or not I love these movies. They are so over the top I even laugh at points.
ReplyDeleteWow you are already on 1982! I really need to catch up. Maybe I’ll stick to movies in The Book for now.
Exactly. That is why even I, with my low tolerance for horror, loved these movies.
DeleteI would love for you to catch up. Those are really good movie years, also off the List.