Byens Lys
I have
previously in various places mentioned Charlie Chaplin’s movies and what I
think of them. I believe I have commented that “Modern Times” was my favorite
of his movies. Correct that. From now on it is “City Lights”. Yes, “Modern
Times” have the fantastic scene with the feeding machine and a number of other
fantastic gags, but it is not a complete movie the way “City Lights” is. As a
comedy it works all the way through. It is consistently funny and move from one
comedic setup to the next in a rapid pace, but without losing track of the
story or the poignancy of the love story the film revolves around. It is in
every meaning of the word a masterpiece.
Yesterday I
had to go to town and brought my little portable DVD player with me in the bus.
I must have caused many glances as I laughed my way through “City Lights”. I
was having a blast. I noticed that in many ways Chaplin acts and reacts like my
2½ year old son and I figured that he might like the movie as well and true
enough, when I got home and put it on the big screen he loved it. Well, it
passed the big test.
The story
is fairly basic, but becomes rather convoluted because of the erratic ways of
the little tramp and especially his eccentric millionaire friend (Harry Myers).
Chaplin falls in love with a blind flower girl (Virginia Cherrill) who thinks
he is rich and not the tramp he really is. Because of his infatuation he gives
her all he can afford and goes to great length to help her when she needs it.
The ability to help her comes from the eccentric millionaire whom Chaplin saves
from committing suicide (almost killing Chaplin in the process) making him his
new best friend. At least when he is drunk, because as he sobers up he
completely forgets about the tramp. Fortunately the millionaire is a thirsty,
despairing man who frequently drowns his sorrows so the tramp is invited in and
kicked out and invited in again in rapid order. When they are friends Chaplin
has the ability to help the girl, when they are not he is left to his own
pitiful abilities. This comes to a head when the girl and her grandmother are
about to be evicted unless they pay outstanding rent and at the same time a
doctor is in town who can cure blindness. Chaplin really needs money and when
his attempt at a boxing career fails he fortunately becomes friends again with
the drunkard and gets sufficient money to save the girl, only to risk losing
them again when burglars assail the millionaire causing him to sober up while
Chaplin is caught red handed with 1000$ in his pocket. Chaplin escapes and
saves the girl, but is then arrested and put away for a while. When he is back
the girl can see again and has made herself a successful flower shop. The
question is, will she recognize and love the tramp now she can see that he is
not a rich man?
That ending
is so elegantly made with such tenderness that it almost hurts. I have to say
that it is one of the most perfect end scenes I ever saw, so raw and
bittersweet, full of hope but unresolved. The question is readable in Chaplin’s
face as she answers “Yes, I can see now”. So ambiguous, but in a good way.
And all the
way through I did not even mention the comedic elements. To do that would
exhaust me, there are just so many. The boxing match is rightly so a classic.
That may be the funniest boxing match ever. But I also love the party at the
restaurant where we get slapstick at full throttle as Chaplin breaks every
convention of proper behavior. Even saving the drunkard ends in comedy as the
drunkard and the tramps simply cannot stay on the dock, but keep pushing each
other into the water. The opening scene itself is high comedy as the high and
mighty of the city are gathered at the revelation of the new town monument,
only to find the tramp sleeping in the arms of the statue. A kazoo is elegantly
used to tell how pointless their speeches are and their aghast expressions to
find the tramp defiling their monument is priceless.
Like the
recent movie “The Artist” Chaplin insisted on making silent movies at a time
when the rest of the world had already changed to talking movies. Chaplin was
convinced that the tramp was a silent character and he was right. Because of
the tramp character he got away with it and created the best silent comedy ever
made. I do not know if his contemporaries appreciated that, but I sure do. I
can see this movie again and again and will many times over the coming years.
Lovely review. I feel the exact same way about this movie. It's so amazing; the first time I saw it, and it ended, and I was a blubbering ball of tears, I sat for about ten minutes feeling completely overwhelmed by how fantastic it was. I still can't describe the end of this movie without crying.
ReplyDeleteI love that your young son enjoyed it. That's awesome!
Exactly. I think it is also what makes Chaplin different from the other silent comedians. There is a heart in what he is doing. He is not just funny, he is also a great humanist.
DeleteVery good review. While I still slightly prefer Modern Times over City Lights I see them really as two different kinds of movies, each very good at what it is.
ReplyDeleteI guess that is the right way to look at it. Right now I am just really in favour of "City Lights". It presses exactly the right buttons.
DeleteFor my Father's 50th 10 years ago, we had a movie night and showed both 'Modern Times' and 'City Lights' on a hired big screen. There were people from 10 to 70 there, and everyone was having a ball. The boxing scene got the most laughs.
ReplyDeleteIt's lovely that your 2 1/2 year old enjoyed it!
Yes, I can believe that. These movies work as well today as they did in their day.
Delete