Tabu
With Tabu
we are back to one of my favorite silent movie directors Friedrich Wilhelm
Murnau. Unfortunately this is not his best movie, but it is still sufficiently
different from other movies of the era that is deserves some special
mentioning.
First of
all this is still a silent movie despite it being from 1931 and thus long into
the sound film era. This may seem odd, but is linked to the peculiar story
behind Tabu. This movie started several
years before when Murnau in his new yacht cruised around in the Pacific Ocean
and fulfilled a childhood dream when he gathered a film crew to make a movie
with and about Polynesians. At this time sound movies were very new and the
technology was not anywhere near ready to be taken out of the studio and
certainly not ready for outdoor recordings on a Polynesian island.
To me,
already deeply embedded in the sound era it is odd to go back to a silent
movie, especially when the music and particularly the sound effects added seem
pasted on and artificial. Especially during partying the sound is more reminiscent
of a saloon dancehall, complete with shouting and stamping, than natives on
Bora Bora.
But I am
getting ahead of myself.
Tabu indeed
takes place on these Polynesian islands and revolves around a young couple who
start out as the happiest and most careless people in the world in their
tropical paradise. Soon however an emissary from the Über-boss arrives
declaring the girl, Reri (Anne Chevalier), a sacred virgin to be consecrated
for the gods and thus tabu. Reri is not at all happy about that and the boy, Matahi,
abducts her from the ship and together they escape in an open canoe.
The second
part of the film, called “Paradise Lost” transpires on another island where
Reri and Matahi have found refuge. Matahi is an accomplished pearl diver, but
without any sense of money he throws big parties and indebts himself over his
head. When the emissary, Hito, shows up here as well they must escape again,
only they do not have the money to go. Matahi breaks another tabu by diving for
exceptional pearls in shark infested waters. He finds his pearls but too late,
the girl is gone.
Except for
the ending, which is not exactly Hollywood friendly (though probably to Murnau’s
taste) the story in itself is not so exceptional. It is a fairly simple story.
The interesting elements here are the cinematography and the story behind the
movie.
It was a
novelty to make a movie placed on tropical islands, not some studio creation,
but really to go there and film it with a local cast. This could easily have
become another “home video”, but Murnau, being a perfectionist, got the natives
to appear as actors. Their actions do not seem forced and the pictures are
beautifully made. Floyd Crossby, the cinematographer, did get an Oscar for his
work, but I would credit Murnau for this success. Being an old master of German
expressionism he knows a thing or two about using the pictures to convey a
message and reduce the use of intertitles to a minimum, partly by using letters
written or read to tell us what is going on, partly smart use of light and
shadow and body language.
Having said
that, he does not reach the heights he achieved in “Der Letzte Man” or “Sunrise”,
but less will do.
Behind the
camera the drama surpassed what went on in front on the camera. Murnau had
initially brought Robert Flaherty into the project and formed a production
company together with him to film “Turia”. Flaherty had experience from Tahiti
and knew an old local legend Murnau wanted to film. Flaherty was a well-known
documentarist (Nanook of the North) and thought to be an asset. Arriving on set
however the two of them turned out to be a very bad match. Their ideas of how
to make the film conflicted thoroughly. Flaherty wanted to make a naturalistic
documentary, Murnau wanted to make a cinema movie in the German tradition. When
their sponsor went broke in the big crash of 29, Murnau redefined the movie,
threw in his own money, changing the name to “Tabu”, sending home much of the Hollywood
crew and made the new movie entirely to his own liking. Flaherty was
sidetracked and resented that greatly. Murnau’s own cameraman, originally just
an assistant to Flaherty, ended up filming most of the movie. An interesting consequence
of the much reduced budget is that Bill Bambridge, the film technician would
also double as the policeman of the movie, and shedding his coat, the local
musician and entertainer.
Despite
Murnau’s “westernization” of “Tabu” I still think it carries a very authentic
nerve. Maybe it is just that this island paradise fits our prejudice of what it
should be, but it looks right. Those people look so charming and happy there on
the island and the culture chock on the pearl diver island also seem very
authentic. A nice detail is that Murnau does not shy away from showing the
native women’s breasts during the festivities. Anybody with even a glimmer of
experience with native Polynesians will know that this is how it is and that
there is nothing sexual in it. I just wonder if that was allowed to get through
to the final American release. The DVD sports a PG disclaimer saying that the
film contains natural nudity and that some scenes are unsuitable for small
children. In the way it is shown in the movie I would say it is particularly
suitable for small children and that it is their parents that might have a
problem.
Returning
from the islands Murnau bought out Flaherty and sold the movie rights for a
pittance. “Tabu” was not a box office success, but Murnau would never know.
Before the premiere in New York he was involved in a car accident and died from
his injuries.
Thus ended
the story of one of early cinema’s greatest directors. I wonder if he too
became a victim of the Tabu?
No comments:
Post a Comment