Off-List: Charade
The first
of the off-List movies I have selected for 1963 is “Charade”. Thank you, Bea,
for reminding me of this movie. It is not only a good pick for a movie that
should have been on the List, it is also exactly what I need in a stream of otherwise
depressive movies.
“Charade” was
recommended to me by my parents-in-law about a year and a half ago and we
watched it together back then. I remember wondering why this movie was not on
the List when so much garbage seem the clutter the early sixties part of the
List, so I started to look for flaws. Strangely enough I found almost none. Almost,
because there is a bit of aging to this movie, but viewed in context with other
1963 movies the flaws are negligible. Here on second viewing I am even happier
about it. This is movie that truly makes me smile.
“Charade”
is a Byzantine maze of hidden identities and scams, an everbody-against-everybody,
a free for all to get the coveted prize of 250.000$.
Regina “Reggie”
Lampert (Audrey Hepburn) is an American socialite in France. She is vacationing
in the Alps with her friend when she is approached, apparently innocently, by
Peter Johua (Cary Grant). Upon returning to Paris her husband is dead and their
apartment entirely empty. Turns out Reggie knew practically nothing about the
late Mr. Lampert and all he has left her is a travelling back with four
different passports and a letter that her dentist appointment has been rescheduled.
In this
moment of need Peter reappears and helps her get back on her feet. Only, he is
not alone. No less than four other men shows up, including a CIA man,
Bartholomew (Walter Matthau), with a keen interest in her, her husband and an
awful lot of money that he was supposed to have, but nobody can find.
What we
learn over the following events is that very few are what they claim to be. One
character in particular changes identity four times in the course of the movie!
There are also very few limits to the extent these people will go to get the
money, including murder. The confusion and mystery make for perfect ingredients
both for comedy and suspense and “Charade” plays both horses very well. The
comedy is largely borne by Grant and Hepburn. Grant for simply being his usual
character (think Thornhill in “North by Northwest) and Hepburn for being, well,
her typical character, somewhere in between “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” and “Roman
Holiday”. The ping-pong dialogue between these two is a reminiscent of the 1930’ies
screwball comedy and it mostly work, though Grant’s lines misfires occasionally.
Where Peter
Joshua is the jovial character, the three stooges, Scobie (George Kenedy), Tex (James
Coburn) and Gideon (Ned Glass), are the sinister types that brings danger to
the mix. The suspense largely comes from their side when they try to force a
solution. Yet, maybe there is an outside player who is even worse…
Beside handling
both comedy and suspense very well, “Charade” has an excellent pace, that keeps
you seated and engaged throughout and, not least, tons of charm. A remake was
made in 2002 (“The Truth About Charlie”) that goes only for the suspense
element and in the process loses all the charm of the original. That one cannot
be recommended.
Of course
there is a credibility issue. I doubt anybody would have handled herself as
cool as Reggie does and I doubt State Treasury employee’s would go to those
extents to bring back money, an army of lawyers would be more realistic, but
that is not the point. In the world “Charade” takes place in, this story is
completely credible, and we would not have it any other way.
“Charade”
is a wonderful good time. It is an excellent opportunity to watch some of the
best actors and actresses of the period do their thing and it is a travesty
that this movie is not on the List.
I can't wait to see it again myself! I love the way the movie handles the large age difference between Hepburn and Grant by making her the first to become interested in a love affair.
ReplyDeleteAt first that age gap is troubling, but yes, they handle it very well.
DeleteAs you say, Charade has charm and a good option when in the need of a diversion from darker material. A bit far fetched that Regina (Audrey Hepburn) knows none of her husband’s family or friends, yet is entertaining, with surprising developments. I’m still not convinced Cary Grant is a GREAT actor, but he does have fine chemistry here with Audrey Hepburn.
ReplyDeleteThe trouble with Cary Grant was that he was typecast. He usually go to play the same character is his movies. It is interesting that he actually did and could do other things. In Notorious he is not nearly as nice and friendly as his usual character.
Delete