Off-List: The Longest Day
”The
Longest Day” is the third off-list film I have chosen to review for 1962. I
recall watching “The Longest Day” ages ago and I was surprised to see that it
had not been included on the List. Now after having watched it again I got confirmed
the grandeur of the spectacle as I remember it, but I also got some
understanding for why it is not on the List.
“The
Longest Day” is a movie about D-Day, the Allied invasion in Normandy in 1944,
no more and no less. The only concession is that it actually starts the
previous evening, which therefore serves as backstory, but otherwise it is
strictly a single day. While limited in time, there is hardly any limit in
scope. We see, or are supposed to see everything. We see the American
parachuters land, we see the British gliders near Caen. We follow the landing
on every one of the five beaches including the scaling of the cliffs on Omaha
beach. We listen the generals back in England, meteorologists, sailors,
officers and privates. We follow English, American and French troops as well as
resistance saboteurs. We even follow the battle on the German side, in the
bunkers, the operation centers and the airfields. This is not only the Longest
Day, but probably also the longest cast list.
It is clear
that the picture intends to portray what really happened on D-Day and therefore
the events of the day is both the plot and the topic. The reproduction is
impressive, and it works. It feels very authentic and it is difficult to let go
of the movie. It is intense and captures well the intensity of the events. As
it often happens the desire to be accurate means that inaccuracies are that
much more glaring. The compromises necessary to make the movie work are so much
more in your face because the movie claims to portray reality.
I can live
with that, though. Countless war movies have inured me to vagaries of
moviemaking. There are other problems that are much worse. With so wide a scope
we lose focus. We do not see the individuals enough to invest in them and they
remain very one-dimensional. We also lose track of event. Shooting here,
shooting there, tons of people dying, what is the big picture, how does it all
fit in? I know enough about the invasion to fill in many of the gaps, but for
most viewers this must be a confusing experience, a bit like watching
“Dunkirk”.
There are
literally a ton of stars on the roster for this movie. It is a who is who in
Hollywood and elsewhere on the male side. Wayne, Fonda, Mitchum and Connery to
mention a few. They all need a few minutes of glory, but that is all we really
see. These are not roles, they are cameos and it rarely works to cram so much
stardom into a single movie. What they do is nice enough, but each of their
stories warrant an entire movie on their own, something later D-Day movies have
done. Limit the scope and you get a much better movie.
The
coverage of the battles looks very modern and I do like that they got all sides
of the affair covered. This is not a simple glorification of American soldiers,
but it actually portrays the Germans as human beings. They are soldiers, not
(necessarily) Nazis. On the other hand, there is something very dated about the
presentation. The movie is packed with inspirational speeches, the kind of talk
that befits propaganda films, but not something that can claim to be realistic.
They weigh the movie down and give it a pathos that it does not need. The
pictures and the topic lend it enough of that.
Another
problematic limitation is to stick to just one day. Nothing is resolved in a day.
A lot of storylines start but practically none are brought to a conclusion. It
would be weeks before the beachheads were consolidated and of course all the
personal stories went far beyond that. I cannot shake the feeling that I have
been watching the first episode of an excellent tv series, an early “Band of
Brothers”, and is waiting for the next episode. Alas, there is no more and so
it feels unfinished.
Still for
all my criticism this was an easy watch. It may be three hours long, but it
flew by in a rush and that is a quality sign. It falls into a number of traps
and feels dated and so I get why it is not on the List. On the other hand, it
is also a very impressive achievement and in many ways a landmark. If “The Ten
Commandments” could by on the List, why not “The Longest Day”?
By now, I am thinking that the editors of the Book had a few martinis at their selection meetings ... I loved this one and was so happy that my beloved Robert Mitchum got to save the day!
ReplyDeleteA few martinis and a reefer or two...
DeleteThere is alot to like in this movie and the sheer scale of it should have given it a spot.