Heaven and Earth Magic
Before
Terry Gilliam there was Harry Everett Smith. Gilliam is (among many other
things) famous for those animations he did as part of Monty Python. They were
made from Victorian cut-outs, were completely surreal and were intentionally
absurd. Years before Gilliam did these Harry Smith did something very similar
and I am quite convinced Gilliam was inspired by Smith.
Smith’s “Heaven
and Earth Magic” is a 66-minute-long animation movie based like Gilliam’s on
Victorian cutouts. There is no apparent storyline, indeed any attempt at wresting
a story out of this flounders. Instead we see surreal things like women on pedestals,
eggs with hammers inside, skeletons with giant syringes and much, much more.
There is a fellow, a male character, that appears throughout the movie, clearly
a protagonist of some sort, who moves around in some sort of dance. He will
carry the woman, give her a melon, find eggs with hammers inside or feed all
sorts of things into the mouth of a big face.
I really have
no idea what it all means. At 66 minutes it is so long that you would think that
it should be more than just absurd images and novel connections and there are
some hints that this play with subconscious images, but if it is religious or existentialist
or whatever, I have no idea.
It is
always frustrating to look at something that makes no sense and after an hour
of this my attention was slipping. Yet there is something fascinating about
these images. It is just so absurd that it is a novelty all in itself. I can
certainly see Terry Gilliam being fascinated by this.
I tried
showing a few minutes of this for my son and though mystified he actually liked
it. Maybe because it was the scene where a foot appears and kick everything to
pieces, that was kind of silly, even for this movie, but I also think children
have an easier time accepting the absurd. I cannot help trying to find meaning
in what I see and maybe there is none.
The Book
writes that the intension is to combine things in new ways and draw on some
common cultural references and maybe that is all it is, a playful and idle game
of combining silly things. I find it hard to accept that that is all there is
to it, but it is the best I can come up with.
“Heaven and
Earth Magic” was a fascinating watch, but also unsatisfying. It is special and
maybe that is why it is taking a slot on the List, but by taking a slot, it excludes
other and better movies. Any of the three off-list movies I reviewed for 1962
deserve the slot more than “Heaven and Earth Magic”.
This
concludes 1962. It took a while and with three extra movies it was also a
bigger year than usual. 1962 had a lot of excellent movies and it will be
difficult for 1963 to reach these heights. But I can always hope it will.
Your reaction to this was about the same as mine, although I think you're kinder to it than I was. I made the same connection to Gilliam's animations.
ReplyDeleteThe difference, of course, is that Gilliam's animations were often funny.
That is a very important difference. Smith's animations are not funny, but obscure and weird.
Delete