Borgerskabets diskrete charme
It is time
for another movie by Luis Bunuel and this time I am quite charmed…literally.
“The Discreet
Charm of the Bourgeoise” (“Le Charme discret de la bourgeoisie”) is a strange
movie, full of Bunuel’s surreal ideas. It is also a comedy where the surreal become
farcical, resulting in one of the most enjoyable Bunuel movies so far on the
List.
Relating
the plot is virtually impossible. Six characters, Rafael Acosta, ambassador to
the invented country of Miranda (Fernando Rey), Mr. and Mrs. Thevenot (Paul
Frankeur and Delphine Seyrig), Thevenot’s sister Florence (Bulle Ogier) and Mr.
and Mrs. Sénéchal (Jean-Pierre Cassel and Stéphane Audran) try to meet to have
dinner, but are every time interrupted, usually by something surreal. People
show up on the wrong evening, the hosts have sneaked out to have some alone
time in the garden, the owner of the restaurant has died and a wake is in progress
and so one. The interruptions get weirder and weirder and play out with that
straight face that make them hilariously funny.
There are a
lot of dreams in the movie, which seem to have multiple purposes. The most
obvious being as a reset button. Whenever the story has moved far enough out of
a surreal tangent, somebody wakes up and we learn that it was just a dream.
That helps a lot to ground the movie because the most surreal elements are then
explained, but we never know when the story turned into a dream, which is yet
another surreal element. Of course, as in all of Bunuel’s movies there are
deeper meanings where I am certain the dreams play a role, though those are not
entirely clear to me. Something Freudian about repressed thoughts seems to fit.
These members of the bourgeoisie appear to live a carefree life where their
only concern is their own company and to get something good to eat and drink.
The dreams are then their guilt, all the things they should have been concerned
with. There is even a dream within a dream and, as a bizarre element, random
people who come up to the characters to tell them about a dream as, of course,
these things happen all the time to people.
The
characters are not really evil or bad, they just want to meet and eat some
food. Sure, the men are smuggling drugs and the ambassador is having an affair
and under constant attack for things happening in his country, but that is all
very trivial. What matters is how to serve a dry martini or to cut up a lamb
roast.
Bunuel was
always political so of course “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoise” is
political. He draws a parallel between the modern bourgeoisie and the eighteenth-century
court at Versailles, where the nobles lived their insular lives of pleasantries,
immune to whatever ailed the world. Here Bunuel lets that world constantly distract
the bourgeoisie, but not in any dramatic way, mostly, but enough to break up the
activity they really wanted to be engaged in. And, because this is Bunuel, there
is even a priest.
I cannot
say that much of the movie made a lot of sense and normally that would bother me,
but not this time. Instead I was constantly chucking at all the absurdities Bunuel
is coming up with. Not unlike my experience with L’Age D’Or. This is fun crazy
stuff. Not outright slapstick, but the tangents just constantly slide into the
bizarre with such ease.
Although
there are obviously deeper motives, the great thing is that it is not necessary
at all to read politics and Freudian themes into the movie because it is so
amusing even at face value. It is crazy and insane and absolutely enjoyable.
Highly
recommended for those (like me) with a penchant for absurd comedy.
For me, this was the one film that rescued the career of Delphine Seyrig. I absolutely hated her other three entries on the 1001 Movies list.
ReplyDeleteThis, though, was delightful!
I cannot say I have much of a relationship with Delphine Seyrig. Her movies must mostly be later on. In this one she did nothing wrong. They were all well casted.
DeleteYou've got two more of hers coming. The first on The List was Last Year at Marienbad.
DeleteThat would explain your negative response to Seyrig. I remember your particular dislike for that movie.
DeleteI agree so completely with your review!
ReplyDeleteThank you. I somehow knew you would.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete