Off-List: A Bridge Too Far
As my
second Off-List movie for 1977 I chose “A Bridge too Far”. An epic scale war
movie, it belongs to a category the List editors generally ignores. Sometimes
with some right, they do tend to be rather trivial, but “A Bridge Too Far” is a
noteworthy movie on several accounts and I think it deserves a slot.
“A Bridge Too
Far” tries to tell the story of an operation towards the end of World War 2
codenamed Operation Market Garden. In September 1944 the Allied forces drove
hard to end the war before Christmas, but struggled with the problem that the Germans
had prepared a defense line on the Rhine. A daring plan was conceived to take
three bridges in The Netherlands with airborne troops and thereby secure an
easy way into Germany. As history will tell us the plan was a trifle optimistic
and left thousands of allied soldiers to die far behind enemy lines.
A story
with this sort of scope was attempted before with “The Longest Day” (based on another
book by the author who wrote the one “A Bridge Too Far” is based on) and this
is not where the similarities end. To cover an event of this magnitude, the
story has to be broken down into many smaller stories, each of which include a separate
set of characters, but combined they have to merge into a larger, coherent
whole. And that is super tricky. Each element has its own stellar cast (the roster
of A-listers is truly impressive!) and we have to see enough of them to get
engaged, but even with a three-hour running time, these are often only vignettes.
Only the soldiers of the besieged 1st Airborne Division in Arnhem (led
by Sean Connery as Major General Roy Urquhart) we get back to again and again as
their situation degrades from bad to truly terrible.
This combination
of ultra-zoom and big picture at the same time is truly difficult. It was the Achilles
heel of “The Longest Day” and it is precariously close to break “A Bridge Too
Far” as well. As a viewer I wish for a map and a roster of characters and how
they each interlink. For the most part, I can only recognize the difference between
American, British and German soldiers by the color of their uniform and their
language and this is where there is some value to have famous actors like Robert
Redford, Michael Caine, James Caan and Elliott Gould take up minor roles, because
I can then identify the characters by the actor. Still, who exactly we were
following at any given time was tricky and I was mistaken more than once.
What does
work is the sense of scale and authenticity. This was the most expensive
production ever made at the time and the production team had gone to
painstaking length to get everything right, equipment, timeline, characters and
locations. Most of the locations are the actual locations in The Netherlands
and that gives it that documentary feel that makes me believe what is
happening. Another thing that works for me here is how the initial cockiness gets
replaced by frustration and desperation. We do not need to know all the
technical details to sense that this is a disaster. This is probably the most
significant departure from “The Longest Day” and what places the movie in the
seventies. When people go to war, they are invincible, trusting that management
has it under control and that this will be another day at the office. Then
reality happens. No plan survives meeting the enemy, especially if management
are on cloud 9 and removed from reality. The losers are all those soldiers sent
out doing the job for management and die as a result. In the post-Vietnam and
post-Watergate era this will have struck a chord.
This may
start out as a movie about heroism, but it is really about who pays for
political and military expediency. One of those war movies that leaves you with
a really bad taste in your mouth.
For this reason,
I think “A Bridge Too Far” is better than its reputation and superior to hero
worshipping movies like “The Longest Day.
I very much grew up on WWII movies like this one. It's a personal favorite, not because of the cast or the epic length, but because it's one of those rare movies (for its time) that doesn't show war as manly and noble, but as tragic and terrible. This isn't about making heroes, but about showing just how wasteful and stupid it is.
ReplyDeleteYes, that is exactly what I mean. It starts in one place as a heroic epos and then the whole thing falls apart. It does not matter how heroic everybody on the ground is when the top brass lives on cloud 9. It did remind me of Paths of Glory in that sense, which is not a bad movie to be compared with.
Delete